The Importance of Native Plants and the Pressures They Face

  • Sara F. Oldfield
  • Peggy Olwell
  • Nancy Shaw
  • Kayri Havens
Part of the Springer Earth System Sciences book series (SPRINGEREARTH)


Plants are important for our survival, our well-being, and our inspiration. The native plants and ecosystems of the U.S. are resources of immense importance, underpinning all life in the country. Plants provide a vast array of ecosystem goods and services. They regulate water supplies, provide oxygen, and sequester carbon, controlling the atmosphere and climate of our planet. In addition, they provide food for us, habitat for wildlife, food for pollinators that are essential for crop production, timber and raw materials for industry,  medicine, ornamental horticulture, and the economy more broadly. Documentation of species in the country since the seventeenth century is briefly considered together with the current state of knowledge of plant species. The global biodiversity hotspots in the country and the main threats to plant species in the U.S. are briefly described.


Ecosystem services Crop wild relatives Medicinal plants Bioenergy Threatened plant species Habitat loss Invasive species Plant biodiversity hotspots 


  1. Ault J (2003) Breeding and development of new ornamental plants from North American native taxa. In: XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Elegant Science in Floriculture. Acta Horticulturae 624:37–42Google Scholar
  2. Burge DO, Thorne JH, Harrison SP, O'Brien BC, Rebman JP, Shevock JR, Alverson ER, Hardison LK, Rodriguez JD, Junak SA, Oberbauer TA, Riemann H, Vanderplank SE, Barry T (2016) Plant diversity and endemism in the California Floristic Province. Madrono 63(2):3–206. Scholar
  3. Calderone NW (2012) Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992–2009. PLoS One 7(5):e37235. Scholar
  4. CBWF (2019) Crested Butte Wildflower Festival. Accessed 11 June 2019
  5. Chamberlain JL, Prisley S, McGuffin M (2013) Understanding the relationships between American ginseng harvest and hardwood forests inventory and timber harvest to improve co-management of the forests of Eastern United States. J Sustain For. Scholar
  6. Clark J (2017) Center for Plant Conservation President’s Message. Accessed 25 Feb 2019
  7. Climate Central (2012) The age of Western wildfires. Accessed 3 Apr 2018
  8. Creutzig F, Ravindranath NH, Berndes G, Bolwig S, Bright S, Cherubini F, Chum H, Corbera E, Delucchi M, Faaij A, Fargione J, Haberl H, Heath G, Lucon O, Plevin R, Popp A, Robledo-abad C, Rose S, Smith P, Stromman A, Sanngwon S, Masera O (2015) Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB Bioenergy 7(5):916–944. Scholar
  9. Evans SG, Kelley LC, Potts MD (2015) The potential impact of second-generation biofuel landscapes on at-risk species in the US. GCB Bioenergy 7(2):337–348. Scholar
  10. Ferguson W (2012) Why wood pulp is world's new wonder material.–100-why-wood-pulp-is-worlds-new-wonder-material/ Accessed 3 May 2018
  11. FWS (2013) U.S. exports of American ginseng 1992–2012. Accessed 5 June 2019
  12. FWS (2015) Wild American ginseng: information for dealers and exporters Item FW 5001. Accessed 5 June 2019
  13. Gibbons B (2011) Wildflower wonders: The 50 best wildflower sites in the world. Bloomsbury, London, UK, 192 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Greene S, Khoury C, Williams K, Wiersema J, Kinard G (2015) Collecting crop wild relatives: an emerging priority. Paper presented at the 2015 National Native Seed Conference, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 13–16 April 2015Google Scholar
  15. Groffman PM, Kareiva P, Carter S, Grimm NB, Lawler J, Mack M, Matzek V, Tallis H (2014) Ecosystems, biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. US Global Change Research Program, pp 195–219. Assessed 3 Apr 2018
  16. Hatfield J, Takle G, Grotjahn R, Holden P, Izaurralde RC, Mader T, Marshall E, Liverman D (2014) Ch. 6: Agriculture. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp 150–174.
  17. Jager HI, Baskaran LB, Brandt CC, Davis EB, Gunderson CA, Wullschleger SD (2010) Empirical geographic modeling of switchgrass yields in the United States. GCB Bioenergy 2(5):248–257. Scholar
  18. Joyce LA, Running SW, Breshears DD, Dale VH, Malmsheimer RW, Sampson RN, Sohngen B, Woodall CW (2014) Forests. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. Scholar
  19. Jungers JM, Sheaffer CC, Fargione J, Lehman C (2015) Short-term harvesting of biomass from conservation grasslands maintains plant diversity. GCB Bioenergy 7:1050–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kartesz J (1999) Exotic vascular plant species: Where do they occur? In: Ricketts TH, Dinertein E, Olson DM et al (eds) Terrestrial ecoregions of North America a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C, p 76–81Google Scholar
  21. Khoury CK, Greene S, Wiersema J, Maxted N, Jarvis A, Struik P (2013) An inventory of crop wild relatives of the United States. Crop Sci 53(4):1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis SM, Gross S, Visel A, Kelly M, Morrow W (2015) Fuzzy GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for US Agave production as a bioenergy feedstock. GCB Bioenergy 7:84–99. Scholar
  23. Lyke J (2001) Conservation status of Cimicifuga rubifolia, C. americana, and C. racemosa. Med Plant Conserv 7:22–24Google Scholar
  24. Mahalovich M (2014) Effects of pests and diseases on Pinus albcaulis in the USA. Case study. In: Shaw K, Hird A (eds) Global survey of ex situ conifer collections. BGCI, Richmond, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C, Gee E, Helms JA, McClure N, Mortimer M, Ruddell S, Smith M, Stewart J (2008) Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States. J For 106(3):115–173Google Scholar
  26. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noss RF, Platt WJ, Sorrie BA, Weakley AS, Means DB, Costanza J, Peet RK (2015) How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Divers Distrib 21:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien K, Swann DE, Springer AC (2011) Results of the 2010 Saguaro Census at Saguaro National Park. Accessed 25 Feb 2019
  29. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 53(3):273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Potter KM, Hargrove WW, Koch FH (2010) Predicting climate change extirpation risk for central and southern Appalachian forest tree species. In: Rentch JS, Schuler TM (eds) Proceedings from the conference on the ecology and management of high-elevation forests in the Central and Southern Appalachian Mountains. Snowshoe, West Virginia, May 14–15, 2009. General Technical Report NRS-P-64. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 179–189Google Scholar
  31. Quinn LD, Gordon DR, Glaser A, Lieurance D, Flory SL (2014) Bioenergy feedstocks at low risk of invasion in the USA: a “white-list” approach. Bioenergy Res. Scholar
  32. Richards CM, Antolin MF, Reilly A, Poole J, Walters C (2007) Capturing genetic diversity of wild populations for ex situ conservation: Texas wild rice (Zizania texana) as a model. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54(3):837–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sari AO, Morales MR, Simon JE (1999) Echinacea angustifolia: an emerging medicinal. In: Janick J (ed) Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, pp 490–493Google Scholar
  34. Shevock J, Taylor DW (1988) Plant exploration in California, the frontier is still here. In: Elias T (ed) Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants. Proceedings of California conference on the conservation and management of rare and endangered plants. California Native Plant Society, pp 91–98Google Scholar
  35. Statista (2019) U.S. forest products industry - statistics & facts. Accessed 11 June 2019
  36. Stein B (2002) States of the Union: ranking America’s biodiversity. NatureServe, Arlington, VA, 25 pGoogle Scholar
  37. USDA (2014) Joint strategic framework on the conservation and use of native crop wild relatives in the United States. FS-1029. USDA Forest Service and Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, 16 pGoogle Scholar
  38. USFS (2019a) Ecosystem services from National Grasslands.
  39. USFS (2019b) Energy & Forest Products. Accessed 11 June 2019
  40. Wilde HD, Gandhi KJ, Colson G (2015) State of the science and challenges of breeding landscape plants with ecological function. Hortic Res 2:1–8.
  41. World Resources Institute (WRI) (2008) Ecosystem services: a guide for decision makers. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara F. Oldfield
    • 1
  • Peggy Olwell
    • 2
  • Nancy Shaw
    • 3
  • Kayri Havens
    • 4
  1. 1.CambridgeUK
  2. 2.Bureau of Land ManagementWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.USDA Forest ServiceRocky Mountain Research StationBoiseUSA
  4. 4.Chicago Botanic GardenGlencoeUSA

Personalised recommendations