Extremal Index for a Class of Heavy-Tailed Stochastic Processes in Risk Theory

  • C. Tillier
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 250)


Extreme values for dependent data corresponding to high threshold exceedances may occur in clusters, i.e., in groups of observations of different sizes. In the context of stationary sequences, the so-called extremal index measures the strength of the dependence and may be useful to estimate the average length of such clusters. This is of particular interest in risk theory where public institutions would like to predict the replications of rare events, in other words, to understand the dependence structure of extreme values. In this contribution, we characterize the extremal index for a class of stochastic processes that naturally appear in risk theory under the assumption of heavy-tailed jumps. We focus on Shot Noise type-processes and we weaken the usual assumptions required on the Shot functions. Precisely, they may be possibly random with not necessarily compact support and we do not make any assumption regarding the monotonicity. We bring to the fore the applicability of the result on a Kinetic Dietary Exposure Model used in modeling pharmacokinetics of contaminants.



Charles Tillier would like to thank Patrice Bertail and Philippe Soulier, both Professors at Paris Nanterre University for insightful comments and discussions which led to an improvement of this work. Financial supports by the ANR network AMERISKA ANR 14 CE20 0006 01 and the Labex MME-DII are also gratefully acknowledged by the author.


  1. 1.
    Asmussen, S. (2003). Applied probabilities and queues. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartkiewicz, K., Jakubowski, A., Mikosch T., & Wintenberger, O. (2011). Stable limits for sums of dependent infinite variance random variables. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 150(3), 337–372.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basrak, B., & Segers, J. (2009). Regularly varying multivariate time series. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 119(4), 1055–1080.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertail, P., Ciolek, G., & Tillier, C. (2018). Robust estimation for Markov chains with application to PDMPs. In Statistical inference for piecewise-deterministic Markov processes. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertail, P., Clémençon, S., & Tillier, C. (2016) Extreme values statistics for Markov chains with applications to finance and insurance. In F. Longin (Ed.), Extreme events in finance: a handbook of extreme value theory and its applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bertail, P., Clémençon, S., & Tressou, J. (2008). A storage model with random release rate for modelling exposure to food contaminants. Mathematical Bioscience and Engineering, 5, 35–60.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertail, P., Clémençon, S., & Tressou, J. (2010). Statistical analysis of a dynamic model for food contaminant exposure with applications to dietary methylmercury contamination. Journal of Biological Dynamics, 4, 212–234.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bondesson, L. (2006). Shot-noise processes and distributions. In Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 12). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chernick, M. R., Hsing, T., & McCormick, W. P. (1991). Calculating the extremal index for a class of stationary sequences. Advances in Applied Probability, 25, 835–850.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cline, D. B. H., & Samorodnitsky, G. (1994). Subexponentiality of the product of independent random variables. Stochastic Process and Their Applications, 49, 75–98.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doney, R. A., O’Brien, G. L. (1991). Loud shot noise. Annals of Applied Probabilities, 1, 88–103.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Embrechts, P., Kluppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance: Vol. 33. Applications of mathematics. Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Homble, P., & William P. (1995). Weak limit results for the extremes of a class of shot noise processes. Journal of Applied Probability, 32, 707–726.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsing, T. L., & Tengels, J. L. (1989). Extremal properties of shot noise processes. Advances in Applied Probability, 21, 513–525.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hult, H., & Samorodnitsky, G. (2008). Tail probabilities for infinite series of regularly varying random vectors. Bernouilli, 14, 838–864.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leadbetter, M. R. (1983). Extremes and local dependence in stationary sequences. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitsth, 65, 291–306.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lefebvre, M., & Guilbault, J. L. (2008). Using filtered Poisson processes to model a river flow. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32(12), 2792–2805.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCormick, W. P. (1997). Extremes for shot noise processes with heavytailed amplitudes. Journal of Applied Probability, 34, 643–656.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCormick, W. P., & Seymour, L. (2001). Extreme values for a class of shot-noise processes. In I. V. Basawa, C. C. Heyde, & R. L. Taylor (Eds.) Selected proceedings of the symposium on inference for stochastic processes. Lecture notes-monograph series (Vol. 37, pp. 33–46). Beachwood, OH: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
  20. 20.
    Mikosch, T. (2010). Non life insurance mathematics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perfekt, R. (1994). Extremal behaviour of stationary Markov chains with applications. The Annals of Applied Probability, 4(2), 529–548.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Resnick, S. I. (2007). Heavy-Tail Phenomena and statistical modeling. Springer series in operations research and financial engineering. New-York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tillier, C., & Wintenberger, O. (2017). Regular variation of a random length sequence of random variables and application to risk assessment. Extremes, 21, 27–56. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weng, C., Zhang, Y., & Tang, K. S. (2013). Tail behavior of Poisson shot noise processes under heavy-tailed shocks and actuarial applications. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 15, 665–682.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Tillier
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HamburgSPSTHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations