Advertisement

Recruiting and Incorporating Mid-Level Providers

  • Peter Borowsky
  • Jacob Blanchett
  • Kyle Pilz
  • Eric C. Makhni
Chapter

Abstract

Although relatively new to the field of healthcare, mid-level providers have become effective and reliable resources to expand clinical productivity – especially in the field of orthopedic surgery. Despite common misconceptions, the hiring of such individuals into a healthcare organization does not create a financial burden. In fact, there are many ways to incorporate these individuals into the healthcare team, with each supporting the notion that having a mid-level provider significantly increases revenue, clinic throughput, and patient access to care. Interviewing and hiring a mid-level provider to become a part of the clinical team is a process that can be customized and adapted based on the physician’s needs, thereby mitigating the burden of the hiring process. Furthermore, just as the interview and hiring processes allow for flexibility, so too does the manner in which the physician chooses how to use mid-level providers. Possible options include having mid-level providers see additional patients in clinic while the supervising physician performs surgical cases, having mid-level providers assist with administrative work and patient contact, and having mid-level providers serve as a first assist during surgical procedures. The manner in which the physician assistant or nurse practitioner is used greatly depends on the goals and desires of the physician, again allowing for a system that can best meet the needs of individual clinics or organizations. In summary, the incorporation into and use of mid-level providers in the orthopedic clinic is a practice whose benefits far outweigh the burdens needed to successfully recruit these providers. Here, we report effective strategies regarding how to incorporate mid-level providers into the orthopedic clinic, as well as the myriad of benefits provided by having these individuals as part of the healthcare team.

Keywords

Mid-level practitioner Physician extender Advanced practice provider Nurse practitioner Physician assistant Certified athletic trainer Clinic throughput Patient satisfaction Incident-to billing Cost-effective care Scope of practice Prescriptive authority 

Notes

Author’s Disclaimer

For purposes of this chapter, the term “mid-level practitioner” (MLP) will be utilized to loosely bundle the “nonphysician” group of advanced practice providers and clinicians entailing nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), certified athletic trainers (ATCs), and other physician extenders such as nurse midwives, nurse anesthetists, and physical therapists.

References

  1. 1.
    Marjoua Y, Bozic KJ. Brief history of quality movement in US healthcare. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(4):265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    PAs Practice Medicine. American Academy of PAs 2017. 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jennings N, Lee G, Chao K, Keating S. A survey of patient satisfaction in a metropolitan emergency department: comparing nurse practitioners and emergency physicians. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009;15(3):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katz JA. The evolving role of PAs: American Academy of PAs; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A look at each APRN role. HealthCom, Media. 2017Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glotzbecker BE, Yolin-Raley DS, DeAngelo DJ, Stone RM, Soiffer RJ, Alyea EP. Impact of physician assistants on the outcomes of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia receiving chemotherapy in an Academic Medical Center. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(5):e228–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Connecticut Academy of Physician Assistants Government Affairs Committee. ConnAPA scope of practice request. Connecticut academy of physician assistants. 2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Furlow B. Nurse practitioners outscore physicians in patient satisfaction survey: Haymarket Media, Inc; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brady MI. A survey assessing patient satisfaction with physician assistant care at the maple street clinic. School of Physician Assistant Studies. 2004;127:1–29.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zerehi MR, Rathfon E. Internists and physician assistants: team-based primary care: American College of Physicians; 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Medical Group Management Association. Physician compensation and production survey: 2009 report based on 2008 data. Englewood: Co: Medical Group Management Association; 2009. p. 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    2016 Practice and Salary Survey Report. Physician assistants Orthopaedic surgery. 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Program Outcomes. Commission on accreditation of athletic training education. 2018.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    NCCPA. Exam development and scoring. 2018.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larson EH, Coerver DA, Wick KH, Ballweg RA. Physician assistants in orthopedic practice. A national study. J Allied Health. 2011;40(4):174–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    State of California. Frequently asked questions about supervising physician assistants. 2016 state of California. 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scope of practice FAQs for consumers. National Council of state boards of nursing. 2018.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith T. Athletic trainers pump up Care in Orthopedics Clinic. UCHealth Central Insider. 2015;8(18)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larkin GL, Hooker RS. Patient willingness to be seen by physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and residents in the emergency department: does the presumption of assent have an empirical basis? Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(8):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hiring a PA: the benefits for physicians and practices. American Academy of physician assistants. 2004.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeCapua M. How much revenue does a primary care nurse practitioner generate? Barton Associates; 2016.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu N, Finkelstein SR, Poghosyan L. A new model for nurse practitioner utilization in primary care: increased efficiency and implications. Health Care Manag Rev. 2014;39(1):10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pecha FQ, Xerogeanes JW, Karas SG, Himes ME, Mines BA. Comparison of the effect of medical assistants versus certified athletic trainers on patient volumes and revenue generation in a sports medicine practice. Sports Health. 2013;5(4):337–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dunn L. 6 Ancillary services to increase your orthopedic practice revenue: ASC Communications; 2010.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.S. News & World Report Announces the 2017 Best Jobs. U.S. News & World Report LP. 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Borowsky
    • 1
  • Jacob Blanchett
    • 1
  • Kyle Pilz
    • 2
  • Eric C. Makhni
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHenry Ford Health SystemWest BloomfieldUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopedics at RUSHRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations