Advertisement

Goethe and Delicate Empiricism

  • Kaustuv Roy
Chapter

Abstract

Delicate empiricism of Goethe is not an esoteric doctrine. It is an approach that challenges the settled habits of thought as it has degenerated in the aeons through which thinking has moved away from what truly needs to be thought. In turning away from its source, thinking has invented empiricism as the sole way of arriving at objective truth. While this method does establish certain external results that are useful, it tells us nothing about why these results are there. As thought advances on the basis of the ‘how’ and without the ‘why,’ it invents a dangerously lop-sided reality in which each action results in multiple unforeseen consequences—the result of philosophical blindness. Delicate empiricism as distinct from gross empiricism opens up thought to the experienceable in a different manner. A deep esthetic intuition is called for, the gradual development of which is the subject of the present chapter. The intuitive alignment of thinking-cognition with phenomena brings about participation (not mere knowledge), and a new organ of intuitive apprehension is born.

References

  1. Shotter, John. “Goethe and the Refiguring of Intellectual Inquiry: From ‘Aboutness’-Thinking to ‘Withness’-Thinking in Everyday Life.”Janus Head 8(1) (2005): 132–158.Google Scholar
  2. Steiner, Rudolf. Goethean Science. Translated by William Lindemann. e.text edition: The Mercury Press, 1988. http://www.philosophyoffreedom.org/files/Goethean_Science.pdf.
  3. Thiele, Leslie Paul. Timely Meditations: Martin Heidegger and Postmodern Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Thomson, Iain. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. von Goethe, J.W. Conversations of Goethe with Eckermann and Soret, Vol. II. Translated by John Oxenford. London: Smith, Elder, 1850.Google Scholar
  6. von Goethe, J.W. Scientific Studies. Translated by Douglas Miller. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. von Goethe, J.W. Faust. Translated by Bayard Taylor. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. von Goethe, J.W. “The Experiment as Mediator of Object and Subject.” Translated by Craig Holdrege. In Context, No. 24 (Fall 2010): 17.Google Scholar
  9. Wahl, Daniel C. “Zarte Empirie: Goethean Science as a Way of Knowing.” Janus Head 8 (1) (2005): 58–76.Google Scholar
  10. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Culture and Value. Edited by George Henrik von Wright. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Azim Premji UniversityBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations