Advertisement

“Resorting to Authoritarian Habits”: Anti-terrorism Laws, State Violence, and Human Rights Prosecutions in Democratic Spain

  • Moira Lynch
Chapter
Part of the Human Rights Interventions book series (HURIIN)

Abstract

This chapter examines the violence between Euskadi Ta Askatasuna and the Spanish government during the early years of Spanish democracy. Protections for state actors who engaged in torture were built into anti-terrorism laws through the legalization of lengthy, unmonitored detention periods, known as incommunicado detention. While legal reforms established during Spain’s democratic transition helped to facilitate prosecutions for state-sponsored killings during the 1980s and early 1990s, investigations and prosecutions of torture allegations were crippled by anti-terrorism laws that normalized and legitimized ill-treatment at the hands of the state.

Bibliography

  1. Aguilar, Paloma. 2001. Justice, Politics and Memory in the Spanish Transition. In The Politics of Memory, ed. de Brito and Gonzalez-Enriquez and Aguilar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aiartza, Urko, and Julen Zabalo. 2010. The Basque Country: The Long Walk to a Democratic Scenario. Berghof Transitions Series, Resistance/Liberation Movements and Transition to Politics. Berghof Conflict Research. Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Amnesty International. 1985. Spain, The Question of Torture: Documents Exchanged by Amnesty International and the Government of Spain. London: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1999. Spain: A Briefing on Human Rights Concerns in Relation to the Basque Peace Process.Google Scholar
  5. Amnesty International Annual Report. 1978.Google Scholar
  6. Amnesty International Annual Report. 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Amnesty International Annual Report. 1980.Google Scholar
  8. Amnesty International Annual Report. 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Amnesty International Annual Report. 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress by the U.S. Department of State: Spain. 1984.Google Scholar
  11. Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress by the U.S. Department of State: Spain. 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress by the U.S. Department of State: Spain. 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress by the U.S. Department of State: Spain. 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress by the U.S. Department of State: Spain. 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Annual Human Rights Reports Submitted to Congress by the U.S. Department of State: Spain. 1999.Google Scholar
  16. Aretxaga, Begoña. 2000. A Fictional Reality: Paramilitary Death Squads and the Construction of State Terror in Spain. In Death Squad: The Anthropology of State Terror, ed. Jeffrey Sluka. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  17. ARGITUZ, Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, Ekimen Elkartea, GAC, Community Action Group, Jaiki-Hadi, Osasun Mentalaren Elkartea (OME), Asociación por el Derecho a la Salud (OSALDE), Department of Social Psychology (Basque Country University). 2013. Incommunicado Detention and Torture: Assessments Using the Istanbul Protocol.Google Scholar
  18. Ataun Rojo v. Spain. 2014. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  19. Barbera, Messegue, and Jabardo v. Spain. 1988. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  20. Behatokia (Basque Observatory of Human Rights). 2007. Comments to the UN Human Rights Committee Report.Google Scholar
  21. Beristain Ukar v. Spain. 2010. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int.
  22. Carmena, Manuela, Jon Mirena Landa, Ramón Múgica, and Juan M Uriarte. 2013. Base Report on Human Rights Violations in the Basque Country Case (1960–2013). Office of the Secretariat General for Peace and Social Harmony, the Basque Government.Google Scholar
  23. Castells v. Spain. 1992. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  24. Clark, Robert P. 1990. Negotiating with ETA: Obstacles to Peace in the Basque Country, 1975–1988. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  25. Código Penal Española. 1995.Google Scholar
  26. COVITE (Colectivo de Víctimas del Terrorismo en el Pais Vasco). 2010. Listado: Victimas Mortales del Terrorismo. www.covite.org
  27. Davis, Madeline. 2005. Is Spain Recovering Its Memory? Breaking the Pacto del Olvido. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (3): 858–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Encarnación, Omar G. 2007. Democracy and Dirty Wars in Spain. Human Rights Quarterly 29: 950–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Etxebarria Caballero v. Spain. 2014. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  30. Gurruchaga, Inigo. Viewpoint: ETA Move Raises Hopes and Stakes. BBC News, October 20, 2011. Retrieved February 2, 2012, www.bbc.co.uk
  31. Herri Batasuna and Batasuna v. Spain. 2009. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  32. Hilbink, Lisa. 2007. Politicizing Law to Liberalize Politics: Anti-Francoist Judges in Spain’s Democratic Transition. In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Change, ed. Terence Halliday, Lucien Karpik, and Malcolm Feeley, 413–414. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2009. The Constituted Nature of Constituents’ Interests: Historical and Ideational Factors in Judicial Empowerment. Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 781–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2012. The Origins of Positive Judicial Independence. World Politics 64 (4): 587–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Human Rights Watch. 2005. Report on Spain’s Counter-terrorist Laws.Google Scholar
  36. Idoiaga, Gorka Espiau. 2006. Special Report: The Basque Conflict, New Ideas and Prospects for Peace. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  37. Interview 13, Oñati, Spain, 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Interview 14, Oñati, Spain, 2010.Google Scholar
  39. Interview 17, Bilbao, Spain 2010.Google Scholar
  40. Interview 18, Bilbao, Spain 2010.Google Scholar
  41. Interview 19, Santoña, Cantabria, Spain 2010.Google Scholar
  42. Interview 19A, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2010.Google Scholar
  43. Maravall, José. 2003. The Rule of Law as a Political Weapon. In Democracy and the Rule of Law, ed. Adam Przeworksi and José Maravall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martinez Sala v. Spain. 2004. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  45. Merino-Blanco, Elena. 2006. Spanish Law and Legal System. 2nd ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
  46. Michel, Verónica, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2013. Human Rights Prosecutions and the Participation Rights of Victims in Latin America. Law and Society Review 47 (4): 873–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Otamendi Egiguren v. Spain. 2012. European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  48. Pérez Gil, Julio. 2003. Private Interests Seeking Punishment: Prosecution Brought by Private Individuals and Groups in Spain. Law and Policy 25 (2): 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Jeffrey K. Staton. 2009. Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation. International Studies Quarterly 53 (1): 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. San Argimiro Isasa v. Spain (2010). European Court of Human Rights. HUDOC Database. www.echr.coe.int
  51. Scheinin, Martin. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms While Countering Terrorism, Mission to Spain, UN Human Rights Council, A/HRC/10/3/Add.2, December 16, 2008.Google Scholar
  52. Torturaren Aurkako Taldea (TAT). Dossier Torturas. 1989 Report.Google Scholar
  53. ———. La Tortura en Euskadi. 1991 Report.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 1992 Annual Report.Google Scholar
  55. ———. Torture in Basque Country. 2001 Report.Google Scholar
  56. Vercher, Antonio. 1992. Terrorism in Europe: An International Comparative Legal Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  57. Woodworth, Paddy. 2001. Dirty War, Clean Hands: ETA, the GAL and Spanish Democracy. Cork: Cork University Press.Google Scholar
  58. ———. GAL Verdict Concludes Investigation into Spanish Dirty War Crimes: A Ruling This Week May Consign Government-Backed Death Squads to History. Irish Times, June 27, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moira Lynch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceLoyola University MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations