How Should We Write a History of Television?

  • Edward Brennan


Brennan considers the history of television in Ireland as one instance of an international problem. The problem is that histories of broadcasting tend to be written at the level of the national. They are preoccupied with the role of national broadcasters within nation states. They tend to play down the roll of international influences and mute the voices of viewers. All the changes, the ‘new normal’, that came with television go unquestioned. They are left hidden in plain sight. Brennan asks how we should write a history of television by combining debates in media theory and historiography. He argues for a synthesis of existing historical approaches, which underpins the book’s post-nationalist approach to the history of television.


  1. “A Glance into the Future.” The Irish Times, November 5, 1926.Google Scholar
  2. Associated Press. “In Saudi Arabia, a High-Tech Way to Flirt.” NBC News, November 8, 2005. Online:
  3. Barbrook, Richard. Imaginary Futures: From Thinking Machines to the Global Village. London: Pluto Press, 2007. Google Scholar
  4. Carey, James W. “Technology and Ideology: The Case of the Telegraph.” Prospects 8 (1983): 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic 3, no. 6 (2011): 56.Google Scholar
  6. Curran, James. “Narratives of Media History Revisited.” In Narrating Media History, edited by Michael Bailey, 25–45. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Darian-Smith, Kate, and Sue Turnbull. Remembering Television: Histories, Technologies, Memories. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Dhoest, Alexander. “Audience Retrospection as a Source of Historiography: Oral History Interviews on Early Television Experiences.” European Journal of Communication 30, no. 1 (2015): 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hilton, James. “Photographs by Wireless: ‘Looking-in’ as well as ‘Listening-in.’” The Sunday Independent, June 13, 1926. Online:
  10. Hobsbawm, Eric. The Age of Capital: 1848–1875. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition. London and New York: Verso, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1963.Google Scholar
  13. McLuhan, Marshall and Quentin Fiore. The Medium Is the Massage. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
  14. Meyrowitz, Joshua. No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. Meyrowitz, Joshua. “Power, Pleasure, Patterns: Intersecting Narratives of Media Influence.” Journal of Communication 58, no. 4 (2008): 641–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moran, Albert. “TV Nation or TV City?” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 24, no. 3 (2010): 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morash, Christopher. A History of the Media in Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  18. “Moving Pictures by Wireless, New Field of Research, Possibilities of Television.” The Irish Times, December 10, 1923.Google Scholar
  19. “My Lady Canned Fruits.” Irish Independent, June 29, 1927.Google Scholar
  20. NBC News 8 November 2005. “In Saudi Arabia, a High-Tech Way to Flirt.” “Notes on News.” The Killarney Echo, January 1, 1910.Google Scholar
  21. O’Sullivan, Tim. “Television Memories and Cultures of Viewing, 1950–65.” In Popular Television in Britain: Studies in Cultural History, edited by John Corner, 159–181. London: British Film Institute, 1991.Google Scholar
  22. Penati, Cecilia. “‘Remembering Our First TV Set’. Personal Memories as a Source for Television Audience History.” VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture 2, no. 3 (2013): 4–12.Google Scholar
  23. “Radio Pictures Next Autumn.” The Irish Times, June 11, 1928.Google Scholar
  24. Schudson, Michael. “Historical Approaches to Communication Studies.” In Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research, edited by Klaus Bruhn Jensen and Nicholas W. Jankowski, 175–190. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. “Seeing by Wireless: Wonderful Possibilities of Television.” The Anglo-Celt, January 12, 1924.Google Scholar
  26. “Selection for Newmarket Meeting Today.” Irish Independent, July 13, 1927.Google Scholar
  27. Sharp, Heather. “Phone Technology Aids UAE Dating”, July 29, 2005,
  28. Spigel, Lynn. Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. “Telegraphed Pictures.” The Irish Times, December 3, 1927.Google Scholar
  30. “Television for All: A Baird ‘Seeing-In’ Set for £25.” Irish Independent, June 22, 1928.Google Scholar
  31. “Television Next?” Irish Independent, May 7, 1923.Google Scholar
  32. “Television: To Be Introduced Soon into Saorstat [sic].” Irish Independent, October 2, 1929.Google Scholar
  33. “Television.” The Irish Times, October 5, 1927. Google Scholar
  34. Williams, Raymond. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Brennan
    • 1
  1. 1.Technological University DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations