European Astropolitics

  • Bohumil Doboš
Part of the Contributions to Political Science book series (CPS)


The final chapter provides the reader with a comprehensive analysis of the European position in outer space geopolitics. First, the common European geopolitical priorities are set up. These are consequently reflected upon the space arena. Europe is presented as a specific actor with its unique strategy and capabilities. These are placed into the SWOT matrix to evaluate the strong and weak points of the common European space program. This analysis together with the previous study of the outer space geopolitical characteristics as well as the history of the European space program then allows us to establish recommendations for the future of the European space strategy. In the opinion presented in this book, the strategy should stand on four main pillars – cooperation, the establishment of independent strategic capabilities, the commercialization of the space programs in general, and participation in new frontier missions.


  1. Al-Ekabi, C. (2015). European access to space: Factors of autonomy. In C. Al-Ekabi (Ed.), European autonomy in space (pp. 137–156). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ekabi, C., & Mastorakis, P. (2015). The evolution of Europe’s launcher and flagship space initiatives. In C. Al-Ekabi (Ed.), European autonomy in space (pp. 1–48). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Rodhan, N. R. F. (2012). Meta-geopolitics of outer space: An analysis of space power, security and governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asbeck, F., & Robinson, J. (2015). Europe’s space security contingencies and preparedness. In C. Al-Ekabi (Ed.), European autonomy in space (pp. 105–112). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Biesbrok, R. (2015). Active debris removal in space: How to clean Earth’s environment for space debris. Charleston: CreateSpace.Google Scholar
  6. Biscop, S., Coelmont, J., Drent, M., & Zandee, D. (2016, February 28). European strategy, European defence and the CSDP: Food for thought. Retrieved April 28, 2016, from
  7. Chapman, B. (2008). Space warfare and defense: A historical encyclopedia and research guide. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, D. (2009). Chapter 24: Spacepower in China. In P. Hays & C. Lutes (Eds.), Towards the theory of spacepower. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, S. B. (2014). Geopolitics: The geography of international relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Conley, H., Ladislaw, S., & Hudson, A. (2016). The US-EU energy relationship. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU leadership in energy and environmental governance: Global and local challenges and response (pp. 159–180). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Council of the European Union. (2014, March 31). DRAFT: International code of conduct for outer space activities. Retrieved May 14, 2016, from
  12. Crotts, A. (2014). The new moon: Water, exploration and future habitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daojiang, Z. (2016). Energy security in EU-China relations: Framing further efforts of collaboration. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU leadership in energy and environmental governance global and local challenges and responses (pp. 113–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. de Montluc, B. (2012). What is the state of play in European governance of space policy. Space Policy, 28(2), 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Winne, F. (2015). European autonomy in space: Human space flight. In C. Al-Ekabi (Ed.), European autonomy in space (pp. 157–164). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Dickow, M. (2015). The pursuit of collective autonomy? Europe’s autonomy in ‘space and security’ lacks a joint vision. In C. Al-Ekabi (Ed.), European autonomy in space (pp. 113–126). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Doboš, B. (2015). Geopolitics of the moon: A European perspective. Astropolitics, 13(1), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dolman, E. (2005). Astropolitik: Classical geopolitics in the space age. London: Frank Cass Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ESA. (2013, March). ESA and space debris. Retrieved May 2, 2016, from
  20. ESA. (2014a, March). The ESA effect: Serving European cooperation and innovation. Retrieved March 25, 2016, from
  21. ESA. (2014b, March). Galileo: The future becomes reality. Retrieved March 27, 2016, from
  22. ESA. (2014c, December 2). Successful conclusion of ESA Council at ministerial level. Retrieved May 2, 2016, from
  23. ESA. (2015a, August 12). Ariane 6 and Vega C begin development. Retrieved May 2, 2016, from
  24. ESA. (2015b, June). Our future in the space age: How space technologies improve our lives. Retrieved April 4, 2016, from
  25. European Commission. (2015, December). A space strategy for Europe. Retrieved May 2, 2016, from
  26. European Commission. (2016, April 5). Space. Retrieved May 2, 2016, from
  27. Friedman, G. (2015). Flashpoints: The emerging crisis in Europe. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Giannopapa, C. (2012). Securing Galileo’s and GMES’s place in European policy. Space Policy, 28(4), 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Godzimirski, J. M. (2016a). Introduction. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU leadership in energy and environmental governance: Global and local challenges and responses (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Godzimirski, J. M. (2016b). Russia-EU energy relations: From complementarity to distrust? In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU leadership in energy and environmental governance: Global and local challenges and responses (pp. 89–112). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Handberg, R. (2013). China’s space strategy and policy evaluation. In E. Sadeh (Ed.), Space strategy in the 21st century (pp. 249–262). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hoerber, T. (2009). ESA + EU: Ideology or pragmatic task sharing? Space Policy, 25(4), 206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hörber, T. (2016). The European Space Agency and the European Union. In T. Hörber, P. Stephenson (Ed.), European space policy: European integration and the final frontier (pp. 53–65). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Hufenbach, B., Reiter, T., & Sourgens, E. (2014). ESA strategic planning for space exploration. Space Policy, 30/3, 174–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson-Freese, J. (2007). Space as a strategic asset. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kennedy, R. (2016). The limits of soft balancing: The frozen conflict in Transnistria and the challenge to EU and NATO strategy. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 27(3), 512–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Köpping Athanasopoulos, H. (2016). Europe’s new wilderness: The Council’s frames on space policy. In T. Hörber & P. Stepheson (Eds.), European space policy: European integration and the final frontier (pp. 82–97). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Kuzemko, C., & Hadfield, A. (2016). Defining and projecting EU energy policy. In J. C. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU leadership in energy and environmental governance: Global and local challenges and responses (pp. 21–50). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. La Regina, V. (2016). Space as a field and tool of international relations. In T. Hörber & P. Stephenson (Eds.), European space policy: European integration and the final frontier (pp. 191–208). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Lebeau, A., Contzen, J. P., Gibson, R., & Taylor, I. (2013). The integrated applications promotion: A new field of action for the European Space Agency. Space Policy, 29(3), 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lele, A. (2013). Asian space race: Rhetoric or reality? Heidelberg: Springer India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Machay, M., & Pochylá, J. (2013). European attitudes toward space exploration and exploitation. Astropolitics, 11(3), 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Madders, K., & Theibaut, W. (2007). Carpe diem: Europe must make a genuine space policy now. Space Policy, 23(1), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moltz, J. C. (2011). The politics of space security: Strategic restraint and the pursuit of National Interests. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mutschler, M. M., & Venet, C. (2012). The European Union as an emerging actor in space security? Space Policy, 28(2), 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oikonomou, I. (2012). The European Defence Agency and EU military space policy: Whose space odyssey? Space Policy, 28(2), 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Orenstein, M. A. (2015). Geopolitics of a divided Europe. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 29/2, 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perfilyev, N. (2010). The Sino-Russian space entente. Astropolitics, 8(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peter, N. (2006). The changing geopolitics of space activities. Space Policy, 22(2), 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Petroni, G., Venturini, K., Verbano, C., & Cantarello, S. (2009). Discovering the basic strategic orientation of big space agencies. Space Policy, 25(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robinson, J., & Romancov, M. (2012). Space crisis management: Filling in the gaps. Retrieved June 4, 2016, from
  52. Robinson, J., & Romancov, M. (2014, January). The European Union and space: Opportunities and risks. Retrieved June 4, 2016, from
  53. Sadeh, E. (2011). The politics of space: A survey. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Simms, B. (2012). Towards a mighty union: How to create a democratic European superpower. International Affairs, 88(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smoleňáková, I. (2015, June). The Pro-Russian disinformation campaign in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Retrieved April 28, 2016, from
  56. Solomon, H. (2015). Terrorism and counter-terrorism in Africa: Fighting insurgency from Al Shabaab, Ansar Dine and Boko Haram. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Su, J., & Lixin, Z. (2014). The European Union draft code of conduct for outer space activities: An appraisal. Space Policy, 30(1), 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tronchetti, F. (2011). Preventing the weaponization of outer space: Is a Chinese–Russian–European common approach possible? Space Policy, 27(2), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Venet, C., & Baranes, B. (Eds.). (2013). European identity through space: Space activities and programmes as a tool to reinvigorate the European identity. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Venet, C., & Schrogl, K.-U. (2013). European experiences with space policies and strategies. In E. Sadeh (Ed.), Space strategy in the 21st century (pp. 263–277). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Verda, M. (2016). The foreign dimension of EU energy policy: The case of the southern gas corridor. In J. M. Godzimirski (Ed.), EU leadership in energy and environmental governance: Global and local challenges and responses (pp. 69–86). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Wang, S.-C. (2009). The making of new ‘space’: Cases of transatlantic astropolitics. Geopolitics, 14(3), 433–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang, S.-C. (2013). Transatlantic space politics: Competition and cooperation above the clouds. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zielonka, J. (2007). Europe as empire: The nature of the enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zielonka, J. (2014). Is the EU doomed? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bohumil Doboš
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Political StudiesCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations