Images in Forensic Thanatology
It is universally acknowledged that imaging techniques occupy a prominent role in forensic medicine. Antemortem and postmortem radiograph comparison is a common procedure carried out by forensic anthropologists and odonatologists to verify the identity of human remains. X-rays, in particular, comprise an essential component of the majority of medicolegal investigations, where they are used to detect foreign bodies and air embolism, as well as provide evidence of fractures and other forms of injury. In addition, whole-body radiography offers crucial assistance in the early detection of potentially dangerous objects, such as unexploded incendiary devices or bullets that have not been activated which, if undiscovered, could result in the forensic investigator sustaining significant injury. Radiological studies perform a vital function in diagnosing intentional injury across the age span. Furthermore, the requirement to provide noninvasive procedures is escalating. This need arises in specific situations where, for cultural or religious reasons, some individuals are opposed to more traditional postmortem examinations.
KeywordsForensic radiology Forensic thanatology Identification Asphyxia Drowning Child abuse Motor vehicle collision Body packers Firearm injuries
- 1.Thali MJ, Vock P (2003) Role and techniques in forensic imaging. In: Payne- James J, Busutil A, Smock W (eds) Forensic medicine: clinical and pathological aspect. Greenwich Medical Media, London, pp 731–746Google Scholar
- 15.Dolinak D, Matches E, Lew E (2005) Forensic pathology: principles and practice. Elsevier/Academic Press, Burlington, MA. ISBN: 0-12-219951-0Google Scholar
- 16.Flach PM, Ross SG, Ampanozi G, Ebert L, Germerott T, Hatch GM, Thali MJ, Patak MA (2012) “Drug mules” as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox. Eur J Radiol 81:2518–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar