Postmortem Computed Tomography: From Acquisition to Reporting

  • Giuseppe Lo Re
  • Roberto Lagalla
  • Stefania Zerbo
  • Federica Vernuccio
  • Elvira Ventura
  • Sergio Salerno
  • Massimo Midiri
  • Antonina Argo


PMCT in a noninvasive, fast, and quite available method which coroners and forensic experts tend to use more and more often, especially when a crime is suspected. PMCT proved to be an excellent tool for detection and assessment of bone fracture injuries due to sharp trauma and bullet trajectories.


Legal issue Forensic radiology Methodology Data Acquisition Reporting Proof evidence Experience Cross-expert examination 


  1. 1.
    Wüllenweber R, Schneider V, Grumme T (1977) A computer-tomographical examination of cranial bullet wounds. Z Rechtsmed 80:227–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thali MJ, Jackowski C, Osterhelweg L, Ross SG, Dirnhofer R (2007) VIRTOPSY—the Swiss virtual approach. Legal Med 9:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poulsen K, Simonsen J (2007) Computed tomography as routine in connection with medico-legal autopsies. Forensic Sci Int 171:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leth PM, Thomsen J (2013) Experience with post-mortem computer tomography in southern Denmark 2006–11. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 1:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Okuda T, Shiotani S, Sakamoto N, Konayashi T (2013) Background and current status of postmortem imaging in Japan: short history of “autopsy imaging (Ai)”. Forensic Sci Int 225:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilemann Y, Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Bollinger SA (2008) Correlation between skeletal trauma and energy in falls from great height detected by post-mortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Forensic Sci Int 180:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leth PM, Struckmann H, Lauritsen J (2013) Interobserver agreement of the injury diagnoses obtained by postmortem computed tomography of traffic fatality victims and a comparison with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 225:15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schnider J, Thali MJ, Ross S, Osterhelweg L, Spendlove D, Bollinger SA (2009) Injuries due to sharp trauma detected by post-mortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT): a feasibility study. Legal Med 11:4–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirchhoff SM, Scaparra EF, Grimm J et al (2016) Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) in deadly gunshot wounds. Int J Legal Med 130:819. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plaetsen SV, De Letter E, Piette M, Van Parys G, Casselman JW, Verstraete K (2015) Post-mortem evaluation of drowning with whole body CT. Forensic Sci Int 249:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leth PM, Madsen BH (2017) Drowning investigated by post mortem computed tomography and autopsy. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 9:28–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aquila I, Falcone C, Di Nunzio C, Tamburrini O, Boca S, Ricci P (2013) Virtopsy versus autopsy in unusual case of asphyxia: case report. Forensic Sci Int 229:e1–e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruder TD, Thali Y, Schindera ST, Dalla Torre SA, Zech W, Ross S, Hatch GM (2012) How reliable are Hounsfield units measurements in forensic radiology? Forensic Sci Int 220:219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweizer W, Vock P, Ozdoba C, Dirnhofer R (2003) Into the decomposed body—forensic digital autopsy using multislice-computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int 134:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murakami T, Akashi S, Uetani M, Murase T, Yamamoto T, Ikematsu K. Burned bodies: how do we evaluate the death in a fire on CT? EPOS Electronic Presentation Online System (105) ECRGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Donnell C, Iino M, Mansharan K, Leditscke J, Woodford N (2011) Contribution of postmortem multidetector CT scanning to identification of the deceased in a mass disaster: experience gained from the 2009 Victorian bushfires. Forensic Sci Int 205:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruder TD, Kneubuehl BP, Gotsmy WF, Mathier S, Ebert LC, Thali MJ, Hatch GM (2012) Radiologic identification of disaster victims: a simple and reliable method using CT of the paranasal sinuses. Eur J Radiol 81:e132–e138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pfaeffli M, Vock P, Dirhofer R, Braun M, Bollinger SA, Thali MJ (2007) Post-mortem radiological CT identification based on classical ante-mortem X-ray examinations. Forensic Sci Int 171:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sidlerr m, Jackowski C, Dirnhoefer R, Vock P, Thali M (2007) Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification—advantages and limitations. Forensic Sci Int 169:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomsen AH, Jurik AG, Uhurenholt L, Vesterby A (2009) An alternative approach to computerized tomography in forensic pathology. Forensic Sci Int 183:87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kasahara S, Makino Y, Hayakawa M, Yajima Y (2012) Diagnosable and non-diagnosable causes of death by postmortem computed tomography: a review of 339 forensic cases. Legal Med 14:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roberts IAS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adults deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Filograna L, Tartaglione T, Filograna E, Cittadini F, Oliva A, Paascali V (2010) Computed tomography (CT) virtual autopsy and classical autopsy discrepancies: Radiologist’s error or a demonstration of post-mortem multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) limitation? Forensic Sci Int 195:e13–e17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaneko T, Hibi M, Nakatsuka A, Omori Y, Hatada T, Takei Y, Takeda K (2010) Postmortem computed tomography is an informative approach for prevention of sudden unexpected natural death in the elderly. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 3:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flach PM, Gascho D, Schweitzer W, Ruder TD, Berger N, Ross SG, Thali MJ, Ampanozi G (2014) Imaging in forensic radiology: an illustrated guide for postmortem computed tomography technique and protocols. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10:583–606. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grabherr S, Djonov V, Thali MJ, Dirnhofer R (2007) Postmortem angiography—review of former and current methods. AJR 188:832–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vogel B, Heinemann A, Gehl A, Hasegawa I, Hopker W-W, Poodendaen C, Tzikas A, Gulbins H, Reichenspurner H, Puschel K, Vogel H (2013) Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and PMCT-angiography after transvascular cardiac interventions. ARCH MED SĄD KRYMINOL LXIII:255–266Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grabher S, Grimm J, Dominguez A, Vanhaebost J, Mangin P (2014) Advances in post-mortem CT-angiography. Br J Radiol 87:20130488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Germerott T, Flach PM, Preiss US, Ross SG, Thali MJ (2012) Post-mortem ventilation a new method for improved detection of pulmonary pathologies in forensic imaging. Legal Med 14:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Christe A, Flach P, Ross S, Spendlove D, Bollinger S, Vock P, Thali MJ (2010) Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: specific and unspecific postmortem signs. Legal Med 12:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jackowski C, Thali M, Aghayev E, Yen K, Sonnenschein M, Zwygart K, Dirnhofer R, Vock P (2006) Postmortem imaging of blood and its characteristics using MSCT and MRI. Int J Legal Med 120:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazali K, Nakayama H, Ko W, Oyake Y, Itai Y (2004) Non-traumatic postmortem computer tomographic (PMCT) findings of the lung. Forensic Sci Int 139:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berger N, Ampanozi G, Schweitzer W, Ross SG, Gascho D, Ruder TD, Thali MJ, Flach PM (2015) Racking the brain: detection of cerebral edema on postmortem computed tomography compared with forensic autopsy. Eur J Radiol 84:643–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Flach PM, Egli TC, Bollinger SA, Berger N, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Schweitzer W (2014) “Blind spots” in forensic autopsy: improved detection of retrobulbar hemorrhage and orbital lesions by postmortem computed tomography (PMCT). Legal Med 16:274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Persson A, Falk J, Berge J, Jackowski C (2013) Atlanto-axial rotatory subluxations in post-mortem CT: radiologists be aware of a common pitfall. Forensic Sci Int 225:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ebert LC, Ruder TD, Martinez RM, Flach PM, Schweitzer W, Thali MJ, Ampanozi G (2015) Computer assisted virtual autopsy using surgical navigation techniques. AJR 204:W58–W62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ampanozi G, Zimmermann D, Hatch GM, Ruder TD, Ross S, Flach PM, Thali MJ, Ebert LC (2012) Format preferences of district attorneys for post-mortem medical imaging reports: understandability, cost effectiveness, and suitability for the courtroom: a questionnaire based study. Legal Med 14:116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Lo Re
    • 1
  • Roberto Lagalla
    • 1
  • Stefania Zerbo
    • 2
  • Federica Vernuccio
    • 1
  • Elvira Ventura
    • 2
  • Sergio Salerno
    • 1
  • Massimo Midiri
    • 1
  • Antonina Argo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biopathology and Medical BiotechnologiesUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Sciences for the Promotion of Health and Maternal and Child Care “G. D’Alessandro”University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations