Advertisement

Conventional Radiology for Postmortem Imaging

  • Stefano D’Errico
  • Diana Bonuccelli
  • Massimo Martelloni
  • Giuseppe GuglielmiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Immediately after its discovery in 1895, conventional radiography was used in the courts to document and illustrate gunshot wounds and for many years continued to represent the most widely used postmortem radiology technique. Despite the advent of CT in forensic practice, conventional radiography still plays an important role in legal medicine and can be considered still useful because of its excellent resolution and absence of artifacts.

Keywords

X-rays Conventional radiology Forensic pathology 

Further Reading

  1. Brogdon BG (1998) Forensic radiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cafarelli FP, Grilli G, Zizzo G, Bertozzi G, Giuliani N, Mahakkanukrauh P, Pinto A, Guglielmi G (2019) Postmortem imaging: an update. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 40(1):86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Errico S, Martelloni M, Cafarelli FP, Guglielmi G (2018) Neurofibromatosis 1 and massive hemothorax: a fatal combination. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 14(3):377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Maio VJM (1999) Gunshot wounds: practical aspects of firearms, ballistics and forensic techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  5. Fatteh AH, Mann GT (1969) The role of radiology in forensic medicine. Sud Med Ekspert 19:16–18Google Scholar
  6. Harcke HT, Levy AD, Abbott RM (2007) Autopsy radiography: digital radiographs (DR) vs. multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in high velocity gunshot wound victims. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 28:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinze S, Uebbing K, Schroder RJ, Urban R, Breitmeier D (2014) Conventional radiology versus the increasing importance of post mortem computed tomography. Arch Kriminol 234(3–4):127–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoogeendoorn TS, van Rijn RR (2010) Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications. Pediatr Radiol 40:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levy AD, Harcke HT (2011) Essentials of forensic imaging. A text atlas. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  10. Peterson GF, Clark SC (2006) Forensic autopsy performance standards. In: National Association of Medical Examiners Annual Meeting (October 16, 2006), San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  11. Pomara C, Karch SV, Fineschi V (2010) Forensic autopsy. A handbook and atlas. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilson AJ (1999) Gunshot injuries: what does a radiologist need to know? Radiographics 19:1358–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano D’Errico
    • 1
  • Diana Bonuccelli
    • 1
  • Massimo Martelloni
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Guglielmi
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Legal MedicineAzienda USL Toscana NordovestLuccaItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations