Imaging for Ballistic Trauma: Other Applications of Forensic Imaging in the Living

  • Salvatore Serraino
  • Livio Milone
  • Dario Picone
  • Antonina Argo
  • Sergio Salerno
  • Massimo Midiri


Firearms are mechanical instruments that allow launching remote specific bodies with mass (bullets) exploiting burst gas energy.

The role of imaging for ballistic trauma is crucial in order to define the main characteristics for both judiciary and nonjudiciary purpose, which are the intracorporeal trajectory, the entrance and exit wounds, and the general characteristics of gunshot injuries.


Forensic radiology Gunshot Postmortem CT Ballistic trauma 

Further Reading

  1. Andenmatten MA, Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Oesterhelweg L, Ross S, Spendlove D, Bolliger SA (2008) Gunshot injuries detected by post-mortem multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT): a feasibility study. Leg Med (Tokyo) 10(6):287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger N, Paula P, Gascho D, Flach PM, Thali MJ, Ross SG, Ampanozi G (2013) Bone marrow edema induced by a bullet after a self-inflicted accidental firing. Leg Med (Tokyo) 15(6):329–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen TE, Bellamy RF (1988) Emergency war surgery. In: Second United States revision of the emergency war surgery handbook. United States Department of Defense, Washington, DC, pp 74–82Google Scholar
  4. DiMaio VJM (1999) Gunshot wounds. Practical aspects of firearms, ballistics, and forensic techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  5. Donchin Y, Rivkind AI, Barziv J et al (1994) Utility of postmortem computed tomography in trauma victims. J Trauma 37(4):552–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dzieman AJ, Mendelson JA, Lindsey D (1961) Comparison of the wounding characteristics of some commonly encountered bullets. J Trauma 1:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fackler ML (1988) Wound ballistics. A review of common misconceptions. JAMA 259:2730–2736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fackler ML, Malinowski JA (1985) The wound pro le: a visual method for quantifying gunshot wound components. J Trauma 25:522–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Filograna L, Tartaglione T, Filograna E, Cittadini F, Oliva A, Pascali VL (2010) Computed tomography (CT) virtual autopsy and classical autopsy discrepancies: Radiologist’s error or a demonstration of post-mortem multi-detector computed tomography limitation? Forensic Sci Int 195:e13–e17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harcke HT, Levy AD, Abbott RM et al (2007) Autopsy radiography: digital radiographs (DR) vs. multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in high-velocity gunshot wound victims. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 28:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heard BJ (2008) Handbook of firearms and ballistics. John Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hollerman JJ, Fackler ML, Coldwell DM et al (1990) Gunshot wounds: 1. Bullets, ballistics, and mechanisms of injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:685–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hollerman JJ, Fackler ML, Coldwell DM et al (1990) Gunshot wounds: 2. Radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:691–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffery AJ, Rutty GN, Robinson C, Morgan B (2008) Computed tomography of projectile injuries. Clin Radiol 63(10):1160–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeffery AJ (2010) The role of computed tomography in adult post-mortem examinations: an overview. Diagn Histopathol 16:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahana T, Hiss J (1999) Forensic radiology. Br J Radiol 72:129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karger B (2014) Handbook of forensic medicine. In: Madea B (ed) Forensic ballistics: injuries from gunshots, explosives and arrows, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  18. Karger B (1995a) Penetrating gunshots to the head and lack of immediate incapacitation. I. Wound ballistics and mechanisms of incapacitation. Int J Leg Med 108:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karger B (1995b) Penetrating gunshots to the head and lack of immediate incapacitation. II. Review of case reports. Int J Leg Med 108:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karger B (2004) Schussverletzungen. In: Brinkmann B, Madea B (eds) Handbuch Gerichtliche Medizin. Springer, Berlin, pp 593–682Google Scholar
  21. Karger B, Billeb E, Koops E, Brinkmann B (2002) Autopsy features relevant for discrimination between suicidal and homicidal gunshot injuries. Int J Leg Med 116:273–278Google Scholar
  22. Karger B (2008) Forensic ballistics. In: Tsokos M (ed) Forensic pathology reviews, vol 5. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 139–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levy AD, Abbott RM, Mallak CT et al (2006) Virtual autopsy: preliminary experience in high-velocity gunshot wound victims. Radiology 240:522–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacPherson D (1994) Bullet penetration. Modeling the dynamics and the incapacitation resulting from wound trauma. Ballistic Publications, El Segundo, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Maiese A, Gitto L, De Matteis A, Panebianco V, Bolino G (2014) Post mortem computed tomography: useful or unnecessary in gunshot wounds deaths? Two case reports. Leg Med (Tokyo) 16(6):357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Milroy CM, Clark JC, Carter N et al (1998) Air weapon fatalities. J Clin Pathol 51:525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oehmichen M, Meissner C, Konig HG et al (2004) Gunshot injuries to the head and brain caused by low-velocity handguns and rifles. A review. Forensic Sci Int 146:111–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Peschel O, Szeimies U, Vollmar C, Kirchhoff S (2013) Postmortem 3-D reconstruction of skull gunshot injuries. Forensic Sci Int 233:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rutty GN, Boyce P, Robinson CE et al (2007) The role of computed tomography in terminal ballistic analysis. Int J Leg Med 122:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rutty GN (2007) Are autopsies necessary? The role of computed tomography as a possible alternative to invasive autopsies. Rechtsmedizin 17:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sellier K (1977) Schusswaffen und Schusswirkungen II. Schmidt-Römhild, LübeckGoogle Scholar
  32. Sellier K (1982) Schusswaffen und Schusswirkungen I. Schmidt-Römhild, LübeckGoogle Scholar
  33. Sellier K, Kneubuehl BP (1994) Wound ballistics and the scientific background. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  34. Tartaglione T, Filograna L, Roiati S, Guglielmi G, Colosimo C, Bonomo L (2012) Importance of 3D-CT imaging in single-bullet cranioencephalic gunshot wounds. Radiol Med 117(3):461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thali MJ, Viner MD, Brogdon BG (2011) Brogdon’s forensic radiology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  36. Thali MJ, Yen K, Vock P et al (2003) Image-guided virtual autopsy findings of gunshot victims performed with multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent correlation between radiology and autopsy findings. Forensic Sci Int 138:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson AJ (1999) Gunshot injuries: what does a radiologist need to know? Radiographics 19:1358–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Serraino
    • 1
  • Livio Milone
    • 2
  • Dario Picone
    • 3
  • Antonina Argo
    • 2
  • Sergio Salerno
    • 1
  • Massimo Midiri
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Sciences for the Promotion of Health and Maternal and Child Care “G. D’Alessandro”University of PalermoPalermoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Biopathology and Medical BiotechnologiesUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations