Advertisement

What Does It Mean to Be Old? “Elderly” Identity as a Sociological Problem

  • Irina Grigoryeva
  • Lyudmila Vidiasova
  • Alexandra Dmitrieva
  • Olga Sergeyeva
Chapter

Abstract

This Chapter provides the idea of what does it mean to be old, “elderly” identity as a sociological problem, including the gender approach and studying elderly identity; age and time, social and individual, generations and conflict; life plans.

Keywords

Elderly Identity Russia 

References

  1. Adam, B., U. Beck, and J. Loon. 2000. The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albertini, M., M. Kohli, and C. Vogel. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: Common patterns – different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy 17 (4): 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (revised and extended. Ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. 2004. Wasted lives. Modernity and its outcasts. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P., and J. Huinink. 2001. Lebensverlaufsforschung als sozialwissenschaftliche forschungsperspektive: themen, konzepte, methoden und problem. Bios 2: 15.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. 1998. Struktura, gabitus, praktika. Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii 1: 2.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenstein, Hester, and Alice Jardine, eds. 1990. The Future of difference. Responsibility. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  8. Epshtejn, M. 2006. K filosofii vozrasta. Fraktalnost zhizni i periodicheskaya tablica vozrastov. Filosofskij kommentarij. Zvezda 4.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, J. 1995. Feminist theory today: an introduction to second-wave feminism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. 1999. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la Prison. Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Gapova, E. 2008. Kejt Millet: lichnoe kak politicheskoe. Neprikosnovennyj zapas 4 (60).Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gilleard, P., and P. Higgs. 2014. Ageing, corporeality and embodiment. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Theory of communicative action. Volume one: reason and the rationalization of society. Trans: Thomas A. McCarthy. Boston, MA.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Howe, N., and W. Strauss. 2000. Millennials rising: The next great generation. In Cartoons, ed. R.J. Matson. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  16. Huizinga, J. 1971. Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kiseleva, Ye. 2010. Utraty v pozhilom vozraste I adaptatsiya k nim. Pozhiloy chelovek v obschestve. Pod red. Grigoryevoy. St. Petersburg: Euopean House.Google Scholar
  18. Kisina, Y. 2005. Litovskaya ruchka (rasskaz). In Russkij rasskaz ХХ veka. Antologiya, ed. Sorokin, vol. l, 551–554. Moscow: Izd-vo Zaharov.Google Scholar
  19. Kosilova, E. 2014. O vzroslenii v multifaktornoi kulture. Otechestvennye zapiski 5 http://www.strana-oz.ru/2014/5/o-vzroslenii-v-multifaktornoy-kulture. Accessed 6 Dec 2017.
  20. Kozlova, T. Z. 1994. Samoidentifikaciya nekotoryh socialnyh grupp po testu «Kto ya?». Social’naya identifikaciya lichnosti. Kn.1. Moscow.Google Scholar
  21. Krasnova, O.V. 2000. Babushki v semie. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya 11: 108–116.Google Scholar
  22. Mead, M. 1970. Culture and commitment - published for the American Museum of Natural History. Garden City, N.Y: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mihel, D. 2003. Vlast, upravlenie, naselenie: vozmozhnaya arheologiya socialnoj politiki Mishelya Fuko. Zhurnal issledovanij socialnoj politiki 1: 91.Google Scholar
  24. Otchet o nauchno-issledovatelskoj rabote po teme. 2004. Izmenenie statusa pozhilyh lyudej, ponyosshih utratu blizkih, ih socialnaya adaptaciya i reabilitaciya. In V ramkah Federalnoj programmy “Starshee pokolenie”. Reg. No 01200408312. Moscow: VNTI Center.Google Scholar
  25. Phillips, A. 1992. Democracy and difference: some problem for feminist theory. Political Quaterly 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polanyi, M. 1998. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Pyatigorskij, A. 2001. Igor Smirnov i Vladimir Sorokin. Novaya russkaya kniga: 1.Google Scholar
  28. Rozhdestvenskaya, E. Y. 2013. Biografiya kak socialnyj fenomen i obekt sociologicheskogo analiza. Avtoreferat diss. dokt. soc. nauk. Moscow.Google Scholar
  29. Semenova, V. V. 2014. Strategiya kombinacii kachestvennogo i kolichestvennogo podhodov pri izuchenii pokolenij. INTER 8.Google Scholar
  30. Shmerlina, I.A. 2013. Liberalizaciya stareniya: teoreticheskie illyuzii i ehmpiricheskie anomalii. V. 1. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny 3 (115): 165–175.Google Scholar
  31. Smolkin, A.A. 2010. Bednost’ i social’nyj status pozhilyh lyudej v sovremennoj Rossii. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya 3: 186–199.Google Scholar
  32. Sztompka, P. 1993. The sociology of social change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Tikhonova, N.E. 2002. Socialnaya eksklyuziya v rossijskom obshchestve. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost 6: 4–21.Google Scholar
  34. Topilin, M. 2014. Starshee pokolenie sejchas drugoe. Rossijskaya gazeta 01.11.2014.Google Scholar
  35. Tulchinskij, G.L. 2015. Rossijskaya politicheskaya kultura: osobennosti i perspektivy. St. Petersburg: Aletejya.Google Scholar
  36. Yarskaya V. N., Bozhok N. S. 2014. Perspektiva pokoleniya. Dvizhenie istoricheskoj rekonstrukcii // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sociologiya. Politologiya. T. 14. No 2. pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
  37. Zdravomyslova, E.A., and A.A. Temkina. 1999. Socialnoe konstruirovanie gendera kak feministskaya teoriya. In Zhenshchina. Gender, ed. Z.A. Hotkina, N.L. Pushkareva, and E.I. Trofimova, 46–65. Moscow: Kultura.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irina Grigoryeva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lyudmila Vidiasova
    • 2
  • Alexandra Dmitrieva
    • 3
  • Olga Sergeyeva
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Petersburg UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.ITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Alliance for Public HealthKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations