“Government Brahmin” Caste, the Educated Unemployed, and the Reproduction of Inequities
Policies and programs of reservation/protective discrimination in education have failed to address inequalities. Public humiliation, increased discrimination, and compromised life-chances mark the lives of many; especially, those who seek a better life through the education route. This essay, based on a longitudinal study, illustrates and draws on experiences of Mallesha, a scheduled caste person aspiring for a government job. Highlighting issues that the capability approach overlooks and tracking how institutions of the government and a range of programs, which are supposedly set up to facilitate “equality of opportunity,” fail to address the embedded nature of discrimination, disadvantage, and the internalized structures of inequality; this chapter captures the subjective dimensions of one person’s search for equality and dignity in a hierarchical society.
KeywordsEducated Unemployed Caste disadvantages
This paper was developed as part of the German Historical Institute London’s Transnational Research Group on ‘Poverty and Education in India’ and was a Working Paper in their series.
- Ambedkar, B.R.  1945. Annihilation of Caste (With a Reply to Mahatma Gandhi). Mumbai: Government of Maharashtra Press.Google Scholar
- ASER. 2014. Annual Status of Education Report 2013. Mumbai: Pratham.Google Scholar
- Bauman, Z. 2004. Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Booth, A., and A. Crouter. 2001. Does It Take a Village? Community Effects on Children, Adolescents and Families. Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Chowdhry, P. 2010. Contentious Marriages, Eloping Couples: Gender, Caste, and Patriarchy in Northern India. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Deshpande, S. 2011. Social Justice and Higher Education in India Today: Markets, States, Ideologies and Inequalities in a Fluid Context. In Equalising Access: Affirmative Action in Higher Education in India, United States and South Africa, ed. M. Nussbaum and Z. Hasan, 212–238. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dev, M., and M. Venkatanarayana. 2011. Youth Employment and Unemployment in India. Working Paper 2011-009, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai.Google Scholar
- Fraser, N. 1997. From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a Postsocialist Age. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, 12–39. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fricker, M. 2011. Powerlessness and Social Interpretation. In The Philosophy of Social Sciences Reader, ed. D. Steel and F. Gualla, 39–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Government of India. 2014. Census of India: Provisional Population Data. www.censusindia.gov.in.
- Holmes, D., and G. Marcus. 2005. Cultures of Expertise and the Management of Globalisation: Towards the Refunctioning of Globalisation. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, ed. Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey, C. 2010. Timepass: Youth, Class, and the Politics of Waiting in India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lareau, A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Malagatti, A. 1994. Government Brahmana. Ondu Atmacharitre [Government Brahman: An Autobiography] (in Kannada). Manasagangotri: Kuvempu Institute of Kannada Studies, University of Mysore.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Advanced Studies. 2002. Urban Poverty and Schooling: Local Education Report for Bangalore. Bangalore: NIAS.Google Scholar
- Rao, V., and M. Walton (eds.). 2004. Culture and Public Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Therborn, G. 2013. The Killing Fields of Inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Wall, Karin, Mafalda Leitão, and Vasco Ramos. 2010. Social Inequality and Diversity of Families. Working Report, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, European Commission, European Research Area.Google Scholar