Advertisement

MRI of Perianal Crohn’s Disease

  • Kyra L. van RijnEmail author
  • Jaap Stoker
Chapter

Abstract

Perianal disease is a common complication in Crohn’s disease and imaging helps the clinician in the diagnosis and decisions regarding therapeutic strategy. Pelvic MRI is the recommended imaging modality because of its accuracy and advantages compared to other imaging techniques. Specific sequences and planes are mandatory for adequate assessment of perianal Crohn’s disease. It is important to understand the perianal anatomy to adequately describe the anatomical location and extension of fistula. Other aspects in the assessment of perianal disease on MRI include the assessment of fistula activity, presence of abscesses and proctitis, and assessment of response to therapy. This chapter provides an overview of technical MRI features, pelvic anatomy, and different aspects of perianal Crohn’s disease on MRI for an adequate diagnostic workup.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging Crohn’s disease Perianal Fistula Proctitis 

References

  1. 1.
    Schwartz DA, Loftus EV, Tremaine WJ, Panaccione R, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, et al. The natural history of fistulizing Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:875–80.  https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.32362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eglinton TW, Barclay ML, Gearry RB, Frizelle FA. The spectrum of perianal Crohn’s disease in a population-based cohort. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:773–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825228b0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gecse KB, Bemelman W, Kamm MA, Stoker J, Khanna R, Ng SC, et al. A global consensus on the classification, diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2014;63:1381–92.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Baumgart DC, et al. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:556–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim DH, Carucci LR, Baker ME, Cash BD, Dillman JR, Feig BW, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria Crohn disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:1048–1057.e4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.07.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maaser C, Sturm M, Vavricka SR, Kucharzik T, Fiorino G, Annese V, et al. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detections of complications. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1093/eccojcc/jjy113.
  7. 7.
    Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, Fletcher JG, Clain JE, Tremaine WJ, et al. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1064–72.  https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2001.28676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Tarroni D, Cohen CRG. Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology. 2004;233:674–81.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siddiqui MRS, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, Daulatzai N, Burling D, Hart A, et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:576–85.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249d26c.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maconi G, Tonolini M, Monteleone M, Bezzio C, Furfaro F, Villa C, et al. Transperineal perineal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of perianal Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:2737–43.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MIB.0000436274.95722.e5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parks AG. Pathogenesis and treatment of fistula-in-ano. Br Med J. 1961;1:463–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hughes LE. Surgical pathology and management of anorectal Crohn’s disease. J R Soc Med. 1978;71:644–51.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014107687807100904.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology. 2006;239:18–33.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391041043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horsthuis K, Stoker J. MRI of perianal Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dwarkasing S, Hussain SM, Hop WCJ, Krestin GP. Anovaginal fistulas: evaluation with endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 2004;231:123–8.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2311021190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sturm A, Maaser C, Calabrese E, Annese V, Fiorino G, Kucharzik T, et al. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 2: IBD scores and general principles and technical aspects. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy114.
  17. 17.
    Dohan A, Eveno C, Oprea R, Pautrat K, Placé V, Pocard M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the diagnosis of abscess complicating fistula-in-ano: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:2906–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3302-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hori M, Oto A, Orrin S, Suzuki K, Baron RL. Diffusion-weighted MRI: a new tool for the diagnosis of fistula in ano. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1021–6.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21934.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Bipat S, Stokkers P, Stoker J. Perianal Crohn disease: evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging as an indicator of disease activity. Radiology. 2009;251:380–7.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2512072128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ziech MLW, Lavini C, Bipat S, Ponsioen CY, Spijkerboer AM, Stokkers PCF, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in determining disease activity in perianal fistulizing Crohn disease: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:170–7.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pinson C, Dolores M, Cruypeninck Y, Koning E, Dacher JN, Savoye G, et al. Magnetization transfer ratio for the assessment of perianal fistula activity in Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:80–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4350-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Samaan MA, Puylaert CAJ, Levesque BG, Zou GY, Stitt L, Taylor SA, et al. The development of a magnetic resonance imaging index for fistulising Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:516–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1508–30.  https://doi.org/10.1053/S0016-5085(03)01367-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics. 2000;20:623–35.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00mc15623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D, Coremans G, Aerden I, Noman M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:332–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9270(02)05909-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Laméris JS. Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;217:395–401.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv13395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Bipat S, Mearadji B, Spijkerboer AM, Ponsioen CY, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, et al. MRI characteristics of proctitis in Crohn’s disease on perianal MRI. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:1918–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0802-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ng SC, Plamondon S, Gupta A, Burling D, Swatton A, Vaizey CJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy guided by magnetic resonance imaging for Crohn’s perineal fistulas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2973–86.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karmiris K, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Vermeire S, Coremans G, Rutgeerts P, et al. Long-term monitoring of infliximab therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease by using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:130–136.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Horsthuis K, Ziech MLW, Bipat S, Spijkerboer AM, de Bruine-Dobben AC, Hommes DW, et al. Evaluation of an MRI-based score of disease activity in perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Clin Imaging. 2011;35:360–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stoker J, Rociu E, Zwamborn AW, Schouten WR, Laméris JS. Endoluminal MR imaging of the rectum and anus: technique, applications, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 1999;19:383–98.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr01383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PCF, Stoker J. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1450–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1287-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI. Pilonidal sinus disease: MR imaging distinction from fistula in ano. Radiology. 2003;226:662–7.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2263011758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Monnier L, Dohan A, Amara N, Zagdanski AM, Drame M, Soyer P, et al. Anoperineal disease in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: MR imaging distinction from perianal Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:4100–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4776-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations