Advertisement

Economic Theory and Economic History

  • Robert P. Gilles
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Economic History book series (PEHS)

Abstract

This chapter argues that the dismal science is in a dismal state. The problem is caused by the existence of very difficult methodologies, complicating the relationship between economic theorising and empirics. As part of a possible remedy, the author discusses how economic theorising could relate more productively to (economic) history. While analytic narratives can be used to explain the particular economic aspects of a historical episode, history can also provide insights about human economic endeavours that help formulate better general theories.

JEL Classification

B41 D85 L14 N01 

Reading List

  1. Backhouse, R. 2010. The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, R.H., A. Greif, M. Levi, J.-L. Rosenthal, and B. Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baumol, W.J. 1990. Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy 98: 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2010. The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2004. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Foley, D.K. 2006. Adam’s Fallacy: A Guide to Economic Theology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilles, R.P. 2018. Economic Wealth Creation and the Social Division of Labour: I—Institutions and Trust. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greif, A. 1993. Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition. American Economic Review 83 (3): 525–548.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harari, Y.N. 2014. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  13. Hodgson, G.M. 2008. After 1929 Economics Changed: Will Economists Wake Up in 2009? Real-World Economics Review 48: 273–278.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, M.O. 2008. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Keen, S. 2011. Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor Dethroned? Revised and Expanded ed. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  16. Kirman, A.P. 2010a. The Economic Crisis is a Crisis for Economic Theory. GREQAM Working Paper.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2010b. Walras’ Unfortunate Legacy. GREQAM Working Paper 2010-58.Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lakatos, I. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCloskey, D.N. 1983. The Rhetoric of Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 481–517.Google Scholar
  21. Menger, K. 1892. On the Origin of Money. Economic Journal 2: 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mirowski, P. (2010). The Great Mortification: Economists’ Responses to the Crisis of 2007—(and Counting). Hedgehog Review, Summer, 28–41.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell, W.C. 1944. The Role of Money in Economic History. Journal of Economic History 4 (Supplement: The Tasks of Economic History): 61–67.Google Scholar
  24. Padgett, J.F., and C.K. Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Popper, K. 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  26. Rubinstein, A. 2006. Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist. Econometrica 74 (4): 865–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2012. Economic Fables. New York: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sargent, T.J., and F.R. Velde. 2002. The Big Problem of Small Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schlefer, J. 2012. The Assumptions Economists Make. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schumpeter, J. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  32. Sims, O. 2017. Entrepreneurship and Wealth Generation in Socially Structured Economies. PhD Thesis, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Smolin, L. 2006. The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of Science, and What Comes Next. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  34. Sutton, J. 2000. Marshall’s Tendencies: What Can Economists Know? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert P. Gilles
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations