Advertisement

Australasia

  • Les Oxley
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Economic History book series (PEHS)

Abstract

Both Australia and New Zealand share similar historical characteristics, having European, typically British, settler origins. This chapter discusses the two original economic drivers of this world region: agriculture and mining. Differences between Australia and New Zealand discussed here include the enfranchisement of indigenous populations, land use and ownership structures, sources and nature of immigration and the management of natural resources.

JEL Classification

N17 N47 N57 N77 

Reading List

  1. Appendices to the Journals of the House of Representatives. n.d. https://atojs.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/atojs.
  2. Condliffe, J.B. 1936. New Zealand in the Making. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Crafts, N. 1997. The Human Development Index and Changes in Standards of Living: Some Historical Comparisons. European Review of Economic History 1 (3): 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Greasley, D. 2015. Industrializing Australia’s Natural Capital, Chap. 7. In The Cambridge Economic History of Australia, ed. S. Ville and G. Withers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Greasley, D., and J.B. Madsen. 2010. Curse and Boon: Natural Resources and Long Run Growth in currently Rich Economies. Economic Record 86 (274): 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greasley, D., and L. Oxley. 1998. A Tale of Two Dominions: Comparing the Macroeconomic Records of Australia and Canada since 1870. The Economic History Review 51: 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2005. Refrigeration and Distribution: New Zealand Land Prices and Real Wages 1873–1939. Australian Economic History Review 45: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2009. The Pastoral Boom, the Rural Land Market, and Long Swings in New Zealand Economic Growth, 1873–1939. The Economic History Review 62: 324–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greasley, D., E. McLaughlin, N. Hanley, and L. Oxley. 2017. Australia: A Land of Missed Opportunities? Environment and Development Economics 22: 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greasley, D., N. Hanley, J. Kunnas, E. McLaughlin, L. Oxley, and P. Warde. 2014. Testing Genuine Savings as a Forward-looking Indicator of Future Well-being over the (Very) Long Run. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67: 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanley, N., L. Oxley, D. Greasley, E. McLaughlin, and M. Blum. 2016. Empirical Testing of Genuine Savings as an Indicator of Weak Sustainability: A Three Country Analysis of Long-Run Trends. Environmental and Resource Economics 63: 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hawke, G. 1985. The Making of New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Maddison, A. 1992. Monitoring the World Economy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  14. New Zealand History Online. n.d. https://nzhistory.govt.nz.
  15. Phillips, J., M. Klapdor, and J. Simon-Davies. 2010. Migration to Australia since Federation: A Guide to the Statistics. Parliament of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
  16. Qasim, M., L. Oxley, and E. McLaughlin. 2018. Genuine Savings as a Test of New Zealand Weak Sustainability. Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2018/01, University of St Andrews. https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/dept-of-geography-and-sustainable-development/pdf-s/DP%202018-1%20Qasim%20et%20al.pdf.
  17. Seltzer, A. 2015. Labour Skills and Migration, Chap. 8. In The Cambridge Economic History of Australia, ed. S. Ville and G. Withers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Vamplew, W. 1987. Australians: Historical Statistics. Broadway, NSW: Fairfax, Syme and Weldon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Les Oxley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations