Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Federica Formato
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality book series (PSLGS)

Abstract

A sexist and imbalanced status quo is reproduced in the language used to describe, refer to and construct women, in both the private and the public spheres. Speakers, politics and the media are all sites where binary and traditional stereotypes about women (and men) are reignited. Women are seen through the lens of a fixed gendered order; the attempt to establish a new order, using gender fairer language and demanding a fairer narration of female victims, is proving detrimental to the category of women. Women face a backlash from those—media, political institutions and speakers—who oppose a re-visitation of cultural understandings about gender in Italy.

References

  1. Abbou, Julie. 2011. Double gender marking in French: A linguistic practice of antisexism. Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (1): 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balirano, Giuseppe. 2017. Transazioni linguistiche: le lingue e il genere negato. In Ripensare il femminile in ambito lusofono e italiano, ed. Debora Ricci, Fabio Mario Da Silva, Livia Apa, Ana Luìsa Vilela, and Annabela Rita, 215–228. Lisbon: Clepul.Google Scholar
  3. Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple. 2017. The discourse of news values: How news organizations create ‘newsworthiness’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucholtz, Mary. 2014. The feminist foundations of language, gender, and sexuality research. In The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality, ed. Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff, and Janet Holmes, 21–47. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Di Rollo, Aureliana. 2010. Educazione linguistica e sessismo: insegnare a riconoscerlo, imparare a evitarlo. In Che genere di lingua? Sessismo e potere discriminatorio delle parole, ed. Maria Serena Sapegno, 153–172. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  7. Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1998. Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In Language and gender: A reader, ed. Janet Coates, 484–494. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2007. Putting communities of practice in their place. Gender and Language 1: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Formato, Federica. 2016. Linguistic markers of sexism in the Italian media: A case study of ministra and ministro. Corpora 11 (3): 371–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Formato, Federica. 2017. ‘Ci sono troie in giro in Parlamento che farebbero di tutto’. Italian female politicians seen through a sexual lens. Gender and Language 11 (3): 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garbagnoli, Sara. 2014. «L’ideologia del genere»: l’irresistibile ascesa di un’invenzione retorica vaticana contro la denaturalizzazione dell’ordine sessuale. Incursioni 3 (6): 250–263.Google Scholar
  14. Gundle, Stephen. 2000. Il bel paese: Art, beauty and the cult of appearance. In The politics of Italian national identity, ed. Gino Bedani, 106–136. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gundle, Stephen. 2007. Bellissima: Feminine beauty and the idea of Italy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  17. Monckton-Smith, Jane. 2012. Murder, gender and the media. Narratives of gendered love. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Potts, Amanda, and Federica Formato. Forthcoming. Women victims of men who murder: XML mark-up for nomination, collocation and frequency analysis of language of the law. In The handbook of language, gender and sexuality, ed. Judith Baxter and Jo Anguri. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Sabatini, Alma. 1987. Raccomandazioni per un uso non sessista della lingua italiana. Commissione nazionale per la realizzazione della parità tra uomo e donna, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. Retrieved from http://www.innovazionepa.it/dipartimento/documentazione/documentazione_pari_opportunita.htm.
  20. Sabatini, Alma. 1993. Ricerca sulla formulazione degli annunci di lavoro. Commissione Nazionale Per La Parità E Le Pari Opportunità Tra Uomo E Donna. Retrieved from http://www.funzionepubblica.gov.it/media/962032/il%20sessismo%20nella%20lingua%20italiana.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LancasterUK

Personalised recommendations