Advertisement

Smart City Platform Specification: A Modular Approach to Achieve Interoperability in Smart Cities

  • Arianna Brutti
  • Piero De Sabbata
  • Angelo Frascella
  • Nicola Gessa
  • Raffaele Ianniello
  • Cristiano Novelli
  • Stefano Pizzuti
  • Giovanni Ponti
Chapter
Part of the Internet of Things book series (ITTCC)

Abstract

The development of our cities towards the Smart City paradigm is one of the challenges facing today’s society. This means, among other things, continuously developing and adopting ICT technologies in order to create platforms on which governments, businesses and citizens can communicate and work together and providing the necessary connections between the networks (of people, businesses, technologies, infrastructures, energy and spaces) that are the base for the services of the city. The incredible vastness and diversity of applications that are emerging in this context generates an enormous amount of data of different types and from heterogeneous sources to be shared and exchanged. In this article we propose an approach and describe a methodology and a modular and scalable multi-layered ICT platform to address the problem of cross-domain interoperability in the context of Smart City applications.

Keywords

Smart city Interoperability Specifications 

References

  1. 1.
    A. Caragliu, C. Del Bo, P. Nijkamp, Smart cities in Europe. J. Urb. Technol. 18(2), 65–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
  2. 2.
    Smart Cities, Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities (2007), http://www.smart-cities.eu/
  3. 3.
    X. Masip-Bruin, G.-J. Ren, R. Serral-Gracia, M. Yannuzzi, Unlocking the value of open data with a process-based information platform, in IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), Vienna, 15–18 July 2013, pp. 331–337Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Global City Team’s Challenge Super Cluster Activity, https://www.nist.gov/el/cyber-physical-systems/smart-americaglobal-cities. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  5. 5.
    A. D’Acunto, M. Mena, G. Di Pasquale, A. Bua, M. Cavalli, S. Contini, S. Dafano, C. Riso, S. Ital, Rapporto Smart City Index 2016, EYGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    IEC, Orchestrating infrastructure for sustainable Smart Cities. White paper (2014), http://www.iec.ch/whitepaper/smartcities. Accessed 13 May 2017
  7. 7.
    H. Panetto, J. Cecil, Information systems for enterprise integration, interoperability and networking: theory and applications. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 1–6 (2013),  https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.684802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Chen, Enterprise Interoperability Framework, in Proceedings of Enterprise Modelling and Ontologies for Interoperability, EMOI-Interop (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Interoperability Framework—Implementation Strategy, European Commission, Brussels, 23–3-2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Locke, P.D. Gallagher, NIST Special Publication 1108—NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0. NIST (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Agostinho, Y. Ducq, G. Zacharewicz, J. Sarraipa, F. Lampathaki, R. Poler, R. Jardim-Goncalves, Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: trends of knowledge and model-driven technology, in Computers in industry, vol. 79, June 2016, pp. 64–76Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.G. Hollands, Will the real Smart City please stand up? in City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, vol.12, no. 3 (2008) pp. 303–320Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Bhatt, A. Brutti, M. Burns, A. Frascella, An Approach to Provide Shared Architectural Principles for Interoperable Smart CitiesGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reference, CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Smart Grid Coordination Group, “Smart Grid Reference Architecture, http://gridscientific.com/images/Smart_Grid_Reference_Artichtecture.pdf. Accessed Nov 2012
  15. 15.
    M. Gottschalk, M. Uslar, C. Delfs, Smart city infrastructure architecture model (SCIAM), in The Use Case and Smart Grid Architecture Model Approach (Springer, 2017), pp. 75–76Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Neureiter, S. Rohjans, D.E. Dominik, C. Danejas, M. Uslar, Addressing the complexity of distributed smart city systems by utilization of model driven engineering concepts, in Conference VDE Kongress 2014 At FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    CEN CENELEC Web Site, CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Sector Forum on Smart and Sustainable Cities and Communities, https://www.cencenelec.eu/standards/Sectors/SmartLiving/smartcities/Pages/SSCC-CG.aspx. Accessed 22 Jan 2018
  18. 18.
    J. Rodríguez-Molina, J.-F. Martínez, P. Castillejo, R. de Diego, SMArc: a proposal for a smart, semantic middleware architecture focused on smart city energy management. Int J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Jang, S.-T. Suh, U-City: New Trends of Urban Planning in Korea based on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Geotechnology and Geoinformation, in ICCSA 2010Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    ITU-T, Smart sustainable cities — a road map. ITU News, https://itunews.itu.int/En/5217-Smart-sustainable-cities-a-road-map.note.aspx (2014)
  21. 21.
    G. Aiello, M. Alessi, L. Marasso, City Enabler: a FIWARE based tool for crawling, collecting and rendering on a map valuable data at urban scale. ngineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A, Research and Development Laboratory, Palermo, Italy (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Leone, Open City Platform—II Cloud Computing per Smart Government, Firenze, 4 Aprile 2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Badii, E. Bellini, P. Bellini, D. Cenni, A. Difino, P. Nesi, M. Paolucci, Km4City: una soluzione aperta per erogare servizi smart city, in GARR-Conf16-proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. di Milano, Milano Smart City—Progetti e principali interventi (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Liviu, DUMITRU, IoT platforms: analysis for building projects, Inform. Econ. 21(2) (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Ben, Y. Alayaab, T. Banouarab, C. Monteilab, K.Drira Chassotab, OM2 M: extensible ETSI-compliant M2 M service platform with self-configuration capability. Proc. Comput. Sci. 32, 1079–1086 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Perera, P. Jayaraman, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, D. Georgakopoulos, Dynamic configuration of sensors using mobile sensor hub in internet of things paradigm, in Proceedings of the IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), Melbourne, Australia, Apr 2013, pp. 473–478Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Turck, Internet of Things: Are We There Yet? (The 2016 IoT Landscape) (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    BSI, Mapping City Standards (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    The Internet of Things-Enabled Smart City Framework, or IES-City Framework (pronounced “YES-City”), NIST, 2017, https://s3.amazonaws.com/nist-sgcps/smartcityframework/files/IoT-EnabledSmartCityFrameworkWP.pdf
  31. 31.
    NIST, NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0 (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. Gottschalk, M. Uslar, C. Delfs: Use Cases—The IEC 62559 methodology, in The Use Case and Smart Grid Architecture Model Approach (Springer, 2017) pp. 11–39Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Buschmann, R. Meunier, H. Rohnert, P. Sommerlad, M. Stal, Pattern-oriented software architecture, in A system of patterns, Vol. 1Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    READY4SmartCities FP7 CSA, Project Reference: 608711, Subprogramme Areae: FP7-SMARTCITIES-2013. Available at the address, http://www.ready4smartcities.eu/
  35. 35.
    V. Guallart, F. Meneses, D. Frogheri, D. Ibañez, R. Rubio, F. Giralt, “City Anatomy: A Framework to support City Governance, Evaluation and Transformation”Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Km4City: Smart City Model and Tools Main Documentation Web Page, http://www.disit.org/drupal/?q=node/6056
  37. 37.
    H. Rijgersberg, M. van Assem, D. Willems, M. Wigham, J. Broekstra, Top, “Ontology of units of Measure (OM)”, https://github.com/HajoRijgersberg/OM#om

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arianna Brutti
    • 1
  • Piero De Sabbata
    • 1
  • Angelo Frascella
    • 1
  • Nicola Gessa
    • 1
  • Raffaele Ianniello
    • 2
  • Cristiano Novelli
    • 1
  • Stefano Pizzuti
    • 1
  • Giovanni Ponti
    • 1
  1. 1.Italian National Agency for New Technologies (ENEA)RomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Engineering (DISI)University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations