Biomechanical Changes of Tympanic Membrane to Blast Waves

  • Rong Z. GanEmail author
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 1097)


Eardrum or tympanic membrane (TM) is a multilayer soft tissue membrane located at the end of the ear canal to receive sound pressure and transport the sound into the middle ear and cochlea. Rupture of the TM is one of the most frequent injuries of the ear after blast exposure in military service members. The TM mechanical property changes induced by blast waves also affect progressive hearing loss in veterans. This chapter describes the biomechanical measurements and modeling of blast wave transduction through the ear and the TM mechanical property changes after blast exposure. The human TM rupture thresholds were determined with a relationship to blast wave direction. It is found that the sensitivity of TM stress change with respect to the pressure reaching on TM surface characterizes the mechanical damage of the TM in relation to blast waves. Mechanical properties of the human TM after exposure to blasts were measured using acoustic loading and laser Doppler vibrometry with the inverse problem-solving method. The complex modulus of the TM exposed to blast waves had significant reduction compared to normal tissue. The SEM images of post-blast TM showed obvious microstructural changes from the normal TM which indicate the tissue damage caused by blast exposures. This chapter provides important data on human TM damage and mechanical changes induced by blast overpressure waves.



This work was supported by the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) Grant W81XWH-14-1-0228. The author would like to thank Kegan Leckness, MS; Don Nakmali, MS; Warren Engles, MS; Xiao D. Ji, PhD; and Xuelin Wang, PhD, for their work involved in the projects reported in this chapter.


  1. Ahmad SW, Ramani GV (1979) Hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol 93:1091–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. von Békésy G (1960) Experiments in hearing. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigelow DC, Swanson PB, Saunders JM (1996) The effect of tympanic membrane perforation size on umbo velocity in the rat. Laryngoscope 106:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cave KM, Cornish EM, Chandler DW (2007) Blast injury of the ear: clinical update from the global war on rerror. Mil Med 172:726–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng T, Dai C, Gan RZ (2007) Viscoelastic properties of human tympanic membrane. Ann Biomed Eng 35:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho S-I, Gao SS, Xia A, Wang R, Salles FT, Raphael PD, Abaya H, Wachtel J, Baek J, Jacobs D, Rasband MN, Oghalai JS (2013) Mechanisms of hearing loss after blast injury to the ear. PLoS One 8(7):e67618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daphalapurkara NP, Dai C, Gan RZ, Lu H (2009) Characterization of the linearly viscoelastic behavior of human tympanic membrane by nanoindentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2(1):82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Greef D, Aernouts J, Aerts J, Cheng JT, Horwitz R, Rosowski JJ, Dirckx JJJ (2014) Viscoelastic properties of the human tympanic membrane studied with stroboscopic holography and finite element modeling. Hear Res 312:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dirckx JJ, Decraemer WF (2001) Effect of middle ear components on eardrum quasi-static deformation. Hear Res 157:124–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dougherty AL, MacGregor AJ, Han PP, Viirre E, Heltemes KJ, Galarneau MR (2013) Blast-related ear injuries among U.S. military personnel. JRehabil Res Dev 50:893–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engles WG, Wang X, Gan RZ (2017) Dynamic properties of human tympanic membrane after exposure to blast waves. Ann Biomed Eng 45(10):2383–2394. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fausti SA, Wilmington DJ, Gallun FJ, Myers PJ, Henry JA (2009) Auditory and vestibular dysfunction associated with blast-related traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 46(6):797–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fay J, Puria S, Decraemer WF, Steele C (2005) Three approaches for estimating the elastic modulus of the tympanic membrane. J Biomech 38:1807–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gan RZ, Feng B, Sun Q (2004) Three-dimensional finite element modeling of human ear for sound transmission. Ann Biomed Eng 32(6):847–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gan RZ, Reeves BP, Wang X (2007) Modeling of sound transmission from ear canal to cochlea. Ann Biomed Eng 35(12):2180–2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gan RZ, Cheng T, Dai C, Yang F, Wood MW (2009) Finite element modeling of sound transmission with perforations of tympanic membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 126:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gan RZ, Nakmali D, Ji X, Leckness K, Yokell Z (2016) Mechanical damage of tympanic membrane in relation to impulse pressure waveform - A study in chinchillas. Hear Res 340:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamernik RP, Keng D (1991) Impulse noise: some definitions, physical acoustics and other considerations. J Acoust Soc Am 90:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamernik RP, Qiu W (2001) Energy-independent factors influencing noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla model. J Acoust Soc Am 110:3163–3168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA, Hsueh KD (1991) The energy spectrum of an impulse: Its relation to hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 90:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawa T, Gan RZ (2014) Pressure distribution in a simplified human ear model for the high intensity sound transmission. J Fluids Eng 136:111108-1–111108-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang G, Daphalapurkar NP, Gan RZ, Lu H (2007) A method for measuring linearly viscoelastic properties of human tympanic membrane using nanoindentation. J Biomech Eng 130:014501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirikae I (1960) The structure and function of the middle ear. University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  24. Leckness K (2016) Novel finite element method to predict blast wave transmission through human ear. MS Thesis. University of Oklahoma, OklahomaGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang J, Yokell Z, Nakmali D, Gan RZ, Lu H (2017) The effect of blast overpressure on the mechanical properties of a chinchilla tympanic membrane. Hear Res 354:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lim DJ (1995) Structure and function of tympanic membrane: A review. Acta Otorhinolaryngolog Belg 49:101–115Google Scholar
  27. Luo H, Dai C, Gan RZ, Lu H (2009) Measurement of young’s modulus of human tympanic membrane at high strain rates. J Biomech Eng 131:064501–064501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo H, Jiang S, Nakmali D, Gan RZ, Lu H (2015) Mechanical properties of a human eardrum at high strain rates after exposure to blast waves. J Dyn Behav Mater 2:59–73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehta RP, Rosowski JJ, Voss SE, O’Neil E, Merchant SN (2006) Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol 27:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Connor KN, Tam M, Blevins NH, Puria S (2008) Tympanic membrane collagen fibers: a key to high-frequency sound conduction. Laryngoscope 118:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santa Maria PL, Atlas MD, Ghassemifar R (2007) Chronic tympanic membrane perforation: a better animal model is needed. Wound Repair Regen 15:450–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT (2007) Non-ossicular signal transmission in human middle ears: experimental assessment of the ‘acoustic route’ with perforated tympanic membranes. J Acoust Soc Am 122(4):2135–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang X, Gan RZ (2010) Dynamic properties of human tympanic membrane – experimental measurement and modelling analysis. IJECB 1:252–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang X, Gan RZ (2012) Dynamic properties of human tympanic membrane based on frequency-temperature superposition. Ann Biomed Eng 41:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering LaboratorySchool of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations