Advertisement

Doing Criminological Autoethnography: Learning from Conversations with Ourselves

  • Stephen Wakeman
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a conversational account of the process that underpins ‘doing’ autoethnography in criminological contexts. It is written in the form of a reflexive ‘conversation with myself’, that is, it poses a number of questions my former self asked of the method and its use, which are answered by my current self having employed autoethnography in my work on heroin users. This isn’t so much ‘what I wish I knew before I started’ but rather ‘what I wish someone had told me before I started’. The ultimate goal is to show how thinking about ‘selves’ in the research process can reveal new and interesting ways of thinking about criminological subjects, as well as to encourage more scholars to have a go at doing the same in their own work.

Keywords

Autoethnography Addiction Emotion Ethics Reflexivity 

References

  1. Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G., & Murphy, K. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Contreras, R. (2013). The stickup kids: Race, drugs, violence and the American dream. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Denzin, N. K. (2014). Interpretive autoethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ferrell, J. (2012). Autoethnography. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), The sage handbook of criminological research (pp. 218–230). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jewkes, Y. (2011). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lumsden, K., & Winter, A. (Eds.). (2014). Reflexivity in criminological research: Experiences with the powerful and the powerless. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Maruna, S., & Matravers, A. (2007). N = 1: Criminology and the person. Theoretical Criminology, 11(4), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muncey, T. (2010). Creating autoethnographies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sparks, R. (2002). Out of the ‘digger’: The Warrior’s honour and the guilty observer. Ethnography, 3(4), 556–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wakeman, S. (2014). Fieldwork, biography and emotion: Doing criminological autoethnography. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 705–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wakeman, S. (2016a). The case for criminological autoethnography. British Journal of Community Justice, 14(2), 75–78.Google Scholar
  14. Wakeman, S. (2016b). The moral economy of heroin in ‘Austerity Britain’. Critical Criminology, 24(3), 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Young, J. (2011). The criminological imagination. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Crime, Criminalisation and Social ExclusionLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations