Doing Criminological Autoethnography: Learning from Conversations with Ourselves
This chapter provides a conversational account of the process that underpins ‘doing’ autoethnography in criminological contexts. It is written in the form of a reflexive ‘conversation with myself’, that is, it poses a number of questions my former self asked of the method and its use, which are answered by my current self having employed autoethnography in my work on heroin users. This isn’t so much ‘what I wish I knew before I started’ but rather ‘what I wish someone had told me before I started’. The ultimate goal is to show how thinking about ‘selves’ in the research process can reveal new and interesting ways of thinking about criminological subjects, as well as to encourage more scholars to have a go at doing the same in their own work.
KeywordsAutoethnography Addiction Emotion Ethics Reflexivity
- Contreras, R. (2013). The stickup kids: Race, drugs, violence and the American dream. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Lumsden, K., & Winter, A. (Eds.). (2014). Reflexivity in criminological research: Experiences with the powerful and the powerless. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Wakeman, S. (2016a). The case for criminological autoethnography. British Journal of Community Justice, 14(2), 75–78.Google Scholar
- Young, J. (2011). The criminological imagination. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar