Advertisement

Just Who Needs Forgiveness? The Emotional Terrain of a Prison-Based Interview

  • Steve Herbert
Chapter

Abstract

Prison-based interviews can provide unique insight into a social world from which most everyone is excluded. Because incarceration policies are socially significant, academic analysts arguably have an obligation to learn as much as possible about how punishment is practiced. One area of such inquiry lies with the increased number of life sentences in the United States. To learn more about this reality, I conducted a series of interviews of lifers in the state of Washington. These interviews necessary traversed emotionally difficult terrain. I use this essay to reflect on the benefits and complications of interviews that cover sensitive issues, particularly in a prison setting where the research subjects suffer from diminished agency.

Keywords

Emotions Ethics Interviews Life sentences Punishment 

References

  1. American Civil Liberties Union. (2012). At America’s expense: The mass incarceration of the elderly. Washington DC: ACLU.Google Scholar
  2. Crewe, B. (2013). Writing and reading a prison: Making use of prisoner life stories. Criminal Justice Matters, 91, 20–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Herbert, S. (2018). Too easy to keep: Life-sentenced prisoners and the future of mass incarceration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Jewkes, Y. (2011). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jewkes, Y. (2013). What has prison ethnography to offer in an age of mass incarceration? Criminal Justice Matters, 91, 14–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liebling, A. (1999). Doing research in prison? Breaking the silence. Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 147–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Liebling, A. (2001). Whose side are we on? Theory, practices and allegiances in prison research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nellis, A. (2017). Still life: America’s increasing use of life and long-term sentences. Washington DC: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
  9. Pittway, E., Bartolemei, L., & Hugman, R. (2010). ‘Stop stealing our stories’: The ethics of research with vulnerable groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2, 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rappaport, J. (2008). Beyond participant observation: Collaborative ethnography as theoretical innovation. Collaborative Ethnographies, 1, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sparks, R. (2002). Out of the ‘Digger’: The warrior’s honour and the guilty observer. Ethnography, 3(4), 556–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law, Societies, and JusticeUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations