Advertisement

Using Prison Ethnography in Terrorism Research

  • Mark S. Hamm
Chapter

Abstract

Over the past 30+ years, I have attempted to explain terrorism from the standpoint of the terrorists themselves through concise case study narratives about the behavioral antecedents and sociopolitical context of terrorism using the prison as a fieldwork setting for ethnographic research. This chapter discusses both the potentials and the pitfalls of this approach. Ethnography in terrorism research is beset with problems, many of which are insurmountable. Problems range from researcher safety and the difficulty of gaining access to terrorists to the dreaded Institutional Review Boards (IRB). But as torturous as they are, IRB procedures are necessary for the researcher’s survival. The objective in this type of research is to conduct face-to-face interviews with terrorist inmates or inmates who have become radicalized toward terrorism during their imprisonment. Crucial to this research is the establishment of rapport between the researcher and the inmates, along with a measure of humility. I conclude that if more criminologists were to use a relational approach that incorporates empathy and listening presence with extremists in prison, perhaps they could cultivate more informed explanations of radicalization, thereby reducing terrorism.

Keywords

Terrorism Radicalization Prison ethnography Criminological verstehen 

References

  1. Adler, P. A. (1985). Wheeling and dealing: An ethnography of an upper-level drug dealing and smuggling community. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chambliss, W. J. (1973). The saints and the roughnecks. Society, 11, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolnik, A. (Ed.). (2013). Conducting terrorism field research: A guide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Ferrell, J. (1993). Crimes of style: Urban graffiti and the politics of criminality. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  6. Ferrell, J., & Hamm, M. S. (Eds.). (1998). Ethnography at the edge: Crime, deviance, and field research. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Flynn, K., & Gerhardt, G. (1989). The silent brotherhood: Inside America’s racist underground. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hamm, M. S. (1993). American skinheads: The criminology and control of hate crime. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Hamm, M. S. (Ed.). (1994). Hate crime: International perspectives on causes and control. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
  11. Hamm, M. S. (1995). The abandoned ones: The imprisonment and uprising of the Mariel boat people. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hamm, M. S. (1997). Apocalypse in Oklahoma: Waco and ruby ridge revenged. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hamm, M. S. (2002). In bad company: America’s terrorist underground. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hamm, M. S. (2007). Terrorism as crime: From Oklahoma city to Al-Qaeda and beyond. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hamm, M. S. (2013). The spectacular few: Prisoner radicalization and the evolving terrorist threat. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamm, M. S., & Spaaij, R. (2017). The age of lone wolf terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartman, K. E. (2009). Mother California: A story of redemption behind bars. New York: Atlas.Google Scholar
  18. Horgan, J., & Stern, J. (2013). Terrorism research has not stagnated. The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 8. Retrieved June 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  19. Irwin, J. (2007). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lindesmith, A. F. (1965). The addict and the law. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Polsky, N. (1967). Hustlers, beats, and others. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Price, T. W. (2005). Murder unpunished: How the Aryan brotherhood murdered Waymond Small and got away with it. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  23. Silke, A. (2008). Research on terrorism: A review of the impact of 9/11 and the global war on terrorism. In H. Chen, E. Reid, J. Sinai, A. Silke, & B. Ganor (Eds.), Terrorism informatics: Knowledge management and data mining for homeland security (pp. 27–49). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Turner, W. (1986). 5 neo-Nazis get stiff sentences for crime spree. New York Times.Google Scholar
  25. Yablonsky, L. (1962). The violent gang. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA

Personalised recommendations