Advertisement

A Twitch or a Blink, an Ethnographer’s Path to Understanding Culture: A Lecture

  • Mark S. Fleisher
Chapter

Abstract

Ethnography requires careful planning and honed analytic skills. The ethnographer’s necessary tool, the measurement instrument predicating all others, is the skillful ethnographer. The ethnographer’s subjectivity acts as the device necessary to plumb the depths of social interaction. No device, other than the skilled ethnographer, can accurately describe the intricacies of social life. Interviews, social network models, and the objective metrics for testing hypotheses cannot be fashioned without the ethnographer at the vanguard. Ethnographers’ participant observation uses a wide range of specialized research tools to open a path to, in Geertz’s terminology, thick description. Thick description captures the threshold of subjective cultural understanding. The ethnographer collects the data that recognize the difference between a twitching eye and a meaningful blink. The cultural information transmitted in a blink unveils complexities of an individual’s worldview. Worldview analysis requires analytic competency in ethnolinguistics and sociolinguistics as language cuts closer to the mind than other evidence. Participant observation and supplementary data analysis uncover the semantics and pragmatics that expose individual and cultural worldview. Only then, when ethnographers have exhausted their research toolkit, can anthropologists call their research ethnography.

Keywords

Anthropological ethnography Worldview Sapir-Whorf hypothesis Thick description 

References

  1. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
  2. Fleisher, M. S. (1972). The possible application of ethno-semantics to prison argot. Anthropological Linguistics, 14(6), 213–219.Google Scholar
  3. Fleisher, M. S. (1984). Hesquiat kinship terminology: Social structure and symbolic world view categories. Anthropos, 1(3), 243–248.Google Scholar
  4. Fleisher, M. S. (1989). Warehousing violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Fleisher, M. S. (1995). Beggars and thieves: Live of urban street criminals. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fleisher, M. S. (1998). Dead end kids: Gang girls and the boys they know. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fleisher, M. S. (2000). (Counter-) transference and compassion fatigue in gang ethnography. Focaal, 36, 77–94.Google Scholar
  8. Fleisher, M. S. (2015a). Living black: Social life in an African American neighborhood. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fleisher, M. S. (2015b). The culture of violent behavior: Language, culture, and worldview of prison rape. In J. Miller & W. R. Palacios (Eds.), Qualitative research in criminology: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 20, pp. 101–131). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Lantis, M. (1938). The Alaskan whale cult and its affinities. American Anthropology, 40(3), 438–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pike, E. V. (1964). The phonology of New Guinea Highlands languages. American Anthropologist, 66(4), 121–132.Google Scholar
  12. Sapir, E. (1927). Language as a form of human behavior. The English Journal, 16(6), 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5(4), 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Suttles, G. D. (1976). Urban ethnography: Situational and normative accounts. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wolfram, W. (2004). Social varieties of American English. In E. Finegan & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Languages in the USA: Themes for the twenty-first century (pp. 58–75). London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social SciencesCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations