Advertisement

Evaluation Step 4: Credibility

  • Leila Benali
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Development in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region book series (PDMENA)

Abstract

The credibility of the reform—or its capacity to provide stability of commitments, and the ability of its governance structure to solve regulatory problems—is critically supported by the design of “effective” regulatory institutions. In MENA, clarity of roles, participation of relevant stakeholders, and accountability are usually guaranteed. The autonomy from political intervention and the predictability of decisions are less certain. The development of robust regulatory frameworks and strong institutions was hampered by under-funding and a reluctance of authorities to transfer independent decision-making to regulatory authorities.

The growth in the volume of subsidies is usually not offset with the hypothetical decrease in production costs due to efficiency and competition. A subsidy applied through fuel pricing can potentially be counter-productive to stimulating efficient use of energy. The restriction of fuel supplies obliged most countries to rethink their position vis-à-vis subsidies. But there are still several constraints affecting the review of subsidies.

Keywords

Credibility Subsidies Regulation 

References

  1. Aissaoui A (2008, Sept) Inflation in MENA region: causes, policy responses and challenges. APICORP Res Econ Comment 3(9)Google Scholar
  2. Brunekreeft G, Keller K (2001) The electricity supply industry in Germany; market power or power of the market? Util Policy 9(1):15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chevalier JM (2004) Les Grandes Batailles de l’Energie, petit traité d’une économie violente. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Domah P, Pollitt MG, Stern J (2002) Modelling the costs of electricity regulation: evidence of human resource constraints in developing countriesGoogle Scholar
  5. Finon D (2004, May) Incentives to invest in liberalized electricity industries in the North and South. Differences in the need for suitable institutional arrangements. Working Paper CIRED, Energy PolicyGoogle Scholar
  6. Guasch JL, Spiller P (1999) Managing the regulatory process: design, concepts, issues, and the Latin America and Caribbean story (English), World Bank Latin American and Caribbean studies; viewpoints. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haggard S (2000) Interests, institutions, and policy reform. In: Krueger A (ed) Economic reform the second stage. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 21–60Google Scholar
  8. Holburn GLF, Spiller P (2002) Institutional or structural reforms; lessons from international electricity sector reforms. In: Brousseau E, Glachant J-M (eds) The economics of contracts: theories and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Levy B, Spiller PT (1994) Institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: a comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. J Law Econ Org 10(2):201–246Google Scholar
  10. Levy B, Spiller PT (eds) (1996) Regulations, institutions and commitment: comparative studies of telecommunications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. McCubbins MD, Noll RG, Weingast BR (1987) Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. J Law Econ Org 3(2):243–277Google Scholar
  12. McCubbins MD, Noll RG, Weingast BR (1989) Structure and process, politics and policy: administrative arrangements. Va Law Rev 75:431–482Google Scholar
  13. Perez Y (2002) l’analyse néo-institutionnelle des réformes électriques européennes. Thèse pour le doctorat en sc. Economiques. Université de Paris I Panthéon- SorbonneGoogle Scholar
  14. Razavi H (2009) Natural gas pricing in countries of the Middle East and North Africa. Energy J 30(3), IAEEGoogle Scholar
  15. Savedoff WD, Spiller PT (1999) Reforms of water distributionGoogle Scholar
  16. Wallsten S (2001a, Mar) An econometric analysis of telecom competition, privatization and regulation in Africa and Latin America. J Ind Econ 49(1):1–19Google Scholar
  17. Stern J, Holder S (1999) Regulatory governance: criteria for assessing the performance of regulatory systems. An application to infrastructure industries in the developing countries of Asia. Util Policy 8:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wallsten S (2001b) Ringing in the 20th century: the effects of state monopolies, private ownership and operating licenses on telecommunications in Europe, 1892–1914 Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Working PaperCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsebelis G (1995) Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism. Br J Polit Sci 25:289–325Google Scholar
  20. Wallsten S (2002) Does sequencing matter? Regulation & privatisation in telecommunication reform, World Bank working paper no. 2817Google Scholar
  21. World Bank (2006) Where is the wealth of the nations? The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leila Benali
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut d’Etudes PolitiquesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations