Paternalistic Leadership: An Indigenous Concept with Global Significance

  • Tzu-Ting Lin
  • Bor-Shiuan ChengEmail author
  • Li-Fang Chou
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Indigenous Psychology book series (PASIP)


Over the past two decades, scholars have argued that the prevailing leadership and its construct is deeply influenced by culture, and have emphasized that leadership may be a common phenomenon in the world, but that the content of leadership is embedded in culture.


  1. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (1999). Sex differences in business ethics: The importance of perceptions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11, 454–474.Google Scholar
  2. Ardichvili, A., & Dirani, K. M. (2017). Introduction to leadership development in emerging market economies. In A. Ardichvili & K. M. Dirani (Eds.), Leadership development in emerging market economies (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional/transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52, 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boer, D., Lin, T. T., García-de-la-Torre, C., Vynoslavska, O., Shim, D., & Popaitoon, P. (2011). The effectiveness of paternalistic leadership across 10 countries. Paper presented at the Regional Conference of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  6. Bogardus, E. S. (1927). Race friendliness and social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 11, 272–287.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Çalışkan, S. C. (2010). The interaction between paternalistic leadership style, organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: A study from Turkey. China-USA Business Review, 9(10), 67–80.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, S. C. H., & Mak, W. (2011). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2005). Full-cycle micro-organizational behavior research. Organization Science, 16, 434–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chemers, M. M. (1993). An integrative theory of leadership. In M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 293–319). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, C. C., & Farh, J. L. (2010). Developments in understanding Chinese leadership: Paternalism and its elaborations, moderations, and alternatives. In M. Bond (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 599–622). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cheng, B. S. (1995). Patriarchal authority and leadership: A case study of Taiwan private enterprises. Institude of Ethnology of Academia Sinica, 79, 119–173.Google Scholar
  14. Cheng, B. S. (2005). Chinese leadership: Theory and practice. Taipei: Lauréat.Google Scholar
  15. Cheng, B. S., Boer, D., Chou, L. F., Huang, M. P., Yoneyama, S., Shim, D., … Tsai, C. Y. (2014). Paternalistic leadership in four East Asian societies: Generalizability and cultural differences of the triad model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64.Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate reverence: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organization. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, B. S., Farh, J. L., & Chou, L. F. (2006). Paternalistic leadership: Model and evidence. Taipei: Hua-Tai.Google Scholar
  19. Cheng, B. S., Wang, A. C., & Huang, M. P. (2009). The road more popular versus the road less traveled by: An “insider’s” perspective of advancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng, H. K., & Kao, L. C. (2008). A case study on Mr. Rei-Lin Lee’s leadership. TPEC Press, 16, 157–170.Google Scholar
  21. Chou, L. F. (2015). The paternalistic leadership of upper echelon in Chinese organization. Research report of Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST-102-2410-H-006-015-MY2). Taipei: Ministry of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  22. Chou, W. J., Cheng, B. S., & Lien, Y. U. (2014). Authoritarian leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 165–189.Google Scholar
  23. Chou, W. J., Chou, L. F., Chen, B. S., & Ren, J. G. (2010). Juan-chiuan and Shang-yan: The components of authoritarian leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 34, 223–284.Google Scholar
  24. den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Kennedy, J. C., et al. (1999). Culture-specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dorfman, P. W., & House, R. J. (2004). Cultural influences on organizational leadership: Literature review, theoretical rationale, and GLOBE project goals. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 51–73). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Dubin, R. (1979). Metaphors of leadership: An overview. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in leadership (pp. 225–238). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Phychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–131). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230–260). New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  32. Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In C. C. Chen & Y. T. Lee (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171–205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton, G. G. (1984). Patriarchalism in imperial China and Western Europe. Theory and Society, 13(3), 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hernandez, M., Eberly, M. B., Avolio, B. J., & Johnson, M. D. (2011). The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1165–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Hsu, Q. F. (2007). Impacts of paternalistic leadership on sport leadership. Quarterly of Chinese Physical Education, 21(1), 51–58.Google Scholar
  39. Hsu, L. W., Huang, M. P., Cheng, B. S., & Farh, J. L. (2006). Moral leadership. In B. S. Cheng & D. Y. Jiang (Eds.), Organizational behaviors in Chinese: Issues, methods and publications (pp. 122–144). Taipei: Hwa Tai.Google Scholar
  40. Ip, P. K. (2009). Is confucianism good for business ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jackson, T. (2016). Paternalistic leadership: The missing link in cross-cultural leadership studies? International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 16(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kao, Z. M. (2004). New agenda of sport leadership: Exploration to the paternalistic leadership. The University Physical Education and Sports, 72, 151–155.Google Scholar
  43. Kao, S. F., & Chen, Y. F. (2006a). The didactic leadership in coaching: A case study of two high school sports teams. Sports and Exercise Research, 8(1), 97–111.Google Scholar
  44. Kao, S. F., & Chen, Y. F. (2006b). Relationships among requirement congruence, actual behavior, leader trust and effectiveness. Sports and Exercise Research, 8(4), 63–77.Google Scholar
  45. Katz, R. L. (1974). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 52(5), 90–102.Google Scholar
  46. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research on Personality, 44(4), 512–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Larsson, G., Sjöberg, M., Vrbanjac, A., & Björkman, T. (2005). Indirect leadership in a military context: A qualitative study on how to do it. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 741–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leung, K., Brew, F. P., Zhang, Z. X., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li, C., Wu, K., Johnson, D. E., & Wu, M. (2012). Moral leadership and psychological empowerment in China. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(1), 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2007). Sex role first, leader role second? Sex combination of supervisor and subordinate, length of cowork, and paternalistic leadership. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 49(4), 433–450.Google Scholar
  53. Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2012). Life- and work-oriented considerate behaviors of leaders in chinese organizations: The dual dimensions of benevolent leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 37, 253–302.Google Scholar
  54. Lin, T. T., Cheng, B. S., & Chou, L. F. (2014a). Paternalistic leadership theory: A critical review. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 42, 3–82.Google Scholar
  55. Lin, T. T., Cheng, B. S., & Chou, L. F. (2014b). The 20-year-journey of paternalistic leadership: A path leading off toward exploration. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 42, 147–177.Google Scholar
  56. Lin, T. T., Cheng, B. S., Kuo, S. T., & Tsai, C. Y. (2009). Gender differences of paternalistic leadership effectiveness over time. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Academy of Management, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  57. Lin, T. T., & Lien, Y. H. (2016). Literature review of coach’s paternalistic leadership. Physical Education Journal, 49(2), 125–142.Google Scholar
  58. Lin, W. Y., & Wang, J. W. (1995). Chinese parenting style: Strictly upbringing or beaten. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 3, 2–92.Google Scholar
  59. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mumford, M. D., Campion, M. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 763–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pillutla, M. M., Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Lin, Z. (2007). An investigation of traditionality as a moderator of reward allocation. Group & Organization Management, 32(2), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Redding, S. G., Norman, A., & Schlander, A. (1994). The nature of individual attachment to theory: A review of east Asian variations. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnett, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 674–688). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual, relational, and collective self: Partners, opponents, or strangers? In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 1–4). Philadelphia: Psychology.Google Scholar
  69. Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and value: The organization of large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  71. Tsai, S. C., Cheng, B. S., & Chou, L. F. (2015). The model of leader-subordinate relational identity. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 121–144.Google Scholar
  72. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Method and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Waley, A. (1939). Three ways of thought in ancient China. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  74. Wang, A. C. (2014). Moral leadership: An indigenous construct or a universal phenomenon? Chinese Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 149–164.Google Scholar
  75. Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang, A. C., Chiang, T. J., Chou, W. J., & Cheng, B. S. (2017). One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 505–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang, A. C., Chiang, T. J., Tsai, C. Y., Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2013). Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations (R. A. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  79. Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18, 445–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Westwood, R. I., & Chan, A. (1992). Headship and leadership. In R. I. Westwood (Ed.), Organizational behaviour: A Southeast Asian perspective. Hong Kong: Longman Group.Google Scholar
  81. Wong, C. S., Law, K. S., & Huang, G. H. (2008). On the importance of conducting construct-level analysis for multidimensional constructs in theory development and testing. Journal of Management, 34(4), 744–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wu, M. (2012). Moral leadership and work performance: Testing the mediating and interaction effects in China. Chinese Management Studies, 6(2), 284–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wu, K., & Zhu, X. G. (2014). Exploration and reflection on moral leadership. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(2), 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu, M., & Xu, E. (2012). Paternalistic leadership: From here to where? In X. Huang & M. H. Bond (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice (pp. 449–466). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  85. Wu, T. Y., Hu, C., & Jiang, D. Y. (2012). Is subordinate’s loyalty a precondition of supervisor’s benevolent leadership? The moderating effects of supervisor’s altruistic personality and perceived organizational support. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yan, Z. T., Tseng, G. Y., & Kao, S. F. (2008). Paternalistic leadership on sport teams. Quarterly of Chinese Physical Education, 22(4), 96–102.Google Scholar
  87. Yang, C. F. (1988). Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Yang, C. F. (2010). Multiplicity of zhong yong studies. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 34, 3–96.Google Scholar
  89. Yang, K. S., & Lu, L. (1993). Psychological analysis of Chinese self concept. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations