Advertisement

The Rural-to-Urban Gradient and Ecosystem Services

  • Dagmar HaaseEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This article presents a case study on long-term land-use and impervious cover change along the urban-to-rural gradient in the city of Leipzig, Germany. The gradient concept offers a promising approach to firstly integrate historical data into current land-use change impact assessment and, secondly, to uncover effects of iterative and simultaneous phases of urban growth and decline including sprawl and compaction.

Keywords

Rural-to-urban gradient Land-use impacts Ecosystem services Soil sealing Compact city Urban sprawl 

References

  1. 1.
    Haase D, Nuissl H. The urban-to-rural gradient of land use change and impervious cover: a long-term trajectory for the city of Leipzig. J Land Use Sci. 2010;5(2):123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haase D. The nature of urban land use and why it is a special case. In: Seto K, Reenberg A, editors. Rethinking global land use in an urban era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S, Theuray N, Lindley SJ. Characterising the urban environment of uk cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan. 2008;87:210–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blair R. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl. 1996;6(2):506–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McDonnell MJ, Stewart T, Pickett A, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, et al. Ecosystem processes along the urban-to- rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst. 1997;1:21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luck M, Wu J. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix Metropolitan Region, Arizona, USA. Landsc Ecol. 2002;17:327–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Irwin EG, Bockstael NE. The evolution of urban sprawl: evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(52):20672–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Westerink J, Haase D, Bauer A, Ravetz J, Jarrige F, Aalbers C. Expressions of the compact city paradigm in peri-urban planning across European city regions – how do planners deal with sustainability trade-offs? Europ Plan Stud. 2012;25:1–25.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haase D, Nuissl H. Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870–2003. Landsc Urban Plan. 2007;80:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nuissl H, Haase D, Wittmer H, Lanzendorf M. Environmental impact assessment f urban land use transitions—a context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy. 2009;26(2):414–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Larondelle N, Haase D, Kabisch N. Diversity of ecosystem services provisioning in European cities. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;26:119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weber N, Haase D, Franck U. Zooming into the urban heat island: how do urban built and green structures influence earth surface temperatures in the city? Sci Total Environ. 2014;496:289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weber N, Haase D, Franck U. Traffic-induced noise levels in residential urban structures using landscape metrics as indicators. Ecol Indic. 2014;45:611–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rall EL, Haase D. Creative intervention in a dynamic city: a sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for brownfields in Leipzig, Germany. Landsc Urban Plan. 2011;100:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyHumboldt Universität zu BerlinRudower Chaussee 16Germany
  2. 2.Department of Computational Landscape EcologyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations