Advertisement

Convergence on Common Ground: MRAs, Memes and Transcultural Contexts of Digital Misogyny

  • MacKenzie Cockerill
Chapter

Abstract

Establishing a global theory of digital misogyny requires exploring the contexts that generate misogynistic content online. The Western men’s rights activist, or MRA, uses digital contexts to his advantage, often producing rapid-fire misogyny in the form of memes. These memes are intended to humorously spread awareness about what MRAs feel are the most pressing problems concerning men today—they operate as a means of ideological summary and casual activism. They are misogynistic, generalized abstractions of men’s rights ideology, oversimplified for wider appeal. The practice of meme-as-activism has fragmented across the internet with myriad interpretations to fit different cultural narratives. The rhetorical approach to digital activism in the form of memes finds an uncanny parallel in the Indian Men’s Rights Association. Indian MRAs seem primarily concerned with and motivated by what they perceive to be anti-men legislation, namely Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which is intended to prevent dowry harassment. 498A is a sore spot for some Indian men, and they organize in digital spaces to voice their issues. In these digital spaces, memes are a popular method of communicating both information and rhetorical bias. Drawing cultural context from Romit Chowdhury’s exploration of the conditions under which Indian men’s rights groups emerged (Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 27–53, 2014a) and Jean Chapman’s research on dowry law and violence in India (Victims of Violence in Indian Families: Where Misogyny and Misandry Meet, 2014–2015), this chapter explores the differences in motivation for both Indian and Western MRAs through cultural contextualization, critical examination of their digital rhetoric and illustration in the form of screencaps and memes within the text. By analysing a variety of examples gathered from MRA sites in Western countries and India (particularly American site AVoiceForMen.com and Indian site MensRightsAssociation.org), I aim to provide a specific understanding of these manifestations of digital misogyny and where they overlap. Such an understanding has broader implications for academic study of cyber misogyny, digital feminism and intersectional activism, and this research suggests a theory of online misogyny on a global scale by connecting different cultural expressions of misogyny through the common medium of digital meme.

References

  1. 498A. Indian Penal Code. Retrieved from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/538436/.
  2. A Voice For Men. Facebook Page. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/A-Voice-for-Men-102001393188684/.
  3. Chapman, J. (2014, May). Violence Against Women in Democratic India: Let’s Talk Misogyny. Paper Presented at the Society for Socialist Studies Conference, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, J. (2015, March). Victims of Violence in Indian Families: Where Misogyny and Misandry Meet. Paper Presented at the Conference on ‘50 Years of Sexism: What Next?’, County Durham.Google Scholar
  5. Chowdhury, R. (2013). Male Sexual Violence: Thoughts on Engagement. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(49), 14–16.Google Scholar
  6. Chowdhury, R. (2014a). Conditions of Emergence: The Formation of Men’s Rights Groups in Contemporary India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 21(1), 27–53. Retrieved May 12, 2017, from http://ijg.sagepub.com/content/21/1/27.
  7. Chowdhury, R. (2014b). Family, Femininity, Feminism: ‘Structures of Feeling’ in the Articulation of Men’s Rights. In K. B. Nielsen & A. Waldrop (Eds.), Women, Gender and Everyday Social Transformation in India (pp. 189–201). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, B., & Gillham, P. F. (2013). Resource Mobilization Theory. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Elam, P. A Voice For Men. Retrieved from https://www.avoiceformen.com/
  10. Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. B. (2001). Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207–1224.Google Scholar
  11. Gajanan, M. (2016, September 13). The Story Behind the Iconic WWII Kissing Photo. TIME Online. Retrieved from http://time.com/4486812/wwii-kiss-photo-vj-day/.
  12. Going GHOST—MGTOW. Facebook Page. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/Going-GHOST-MGTOW-303452403113081/.
  13. hooks, b. (2010). Understanding Patriarchy. Louisville: No Borders Collective/LAFF. Retrieved from http://imaginenoborders.org/zines/#UnderstandingPatriarchy.
  14. Kimmel, M. (2005). The Gender of Desire: Essays on Male Sexuality. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Levin, S. (2016, June 8). Stanford Sexual Assault: Woman Who Blamed Victim For Drinking Apologizes. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/08/stanford-sexual-assault-brock-turner-court-letter-apology.
  16. Masculinist-India. Tumblr Blog. Retrieved from https://masculinist-india.tumblr.com//.
  17. Men Going Their Own Way. A Voice For Men Reference Wiki. Retrieved from http://reference.avoiceformen.com/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way_(MGTOW).
  18. Men’s Rights Association. Facebook Page. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/mensrightsassociation/.
  19. Men’s Rights Association. Home. Retrieved from http://mensrightsassociation.org/.
  20. Men’s Rights India. Home. Retrieved from http://menrightsindia.net/.
  21. PUAHate. Reddit. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/puahate/.
  22. Rodger, E. (2014, May 24). Elliot Roger’s Retribution. KRON4, 6, 56. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zExDivIW4FM.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • MacKenzie Cockerill
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations