Advertisement

The Development and Pilot Testing of the Measurement Tool of Skills Level Development in the Lower Secondary Physics Classroom

  • Katarína Krišková
  • Marián Kireš
Chapter

Abstract

The trend in education is not to focus on the knowledge, but on the skills, which are essential for every pupil. There are a lot of various skills; some of them are to be developed primarily in science education. Science education has the common feature—the experiment that can also be used for the pupils’ skills development. The integral part of improving the skill is the measurement of progress and the skill level development. The aim of the paper is to present the development and the pilot testing of a measurement tool for selected skills that is suitable for the lower secondary education (the age of the target group is 10–15). The skills are: making predictions, following directions and working with data tables. We assume the skills are suitable for the lower secondary education, and they can be easily improved in the physics classrooms via hands-on activities and experiments. After selecting the skill, levels of each skill were defined. The level of enhancement was determined according to the literature and our teaching experiences. At first, we analysed the physics textbook from the view of selected skills, so we can assume the skills could be developed in the physics education. Also, teachers had to be trained for such an action. Teachers stated they wanted more activities focused on the skills fostering. However, there is also a need for the feedback and the measurement tool of the efficiency of the teaching method. To test the efficiency of the method, we created the measurement tool that is focused on the selected skills. It has a form of the test for pupils. Several tests of integrated process skills were used as a basis and the inspiration for tasks. The tasks, as well as the whole test, were prepared in a playful and informal way, so the pupils felt comfortable when they were solving the worksheet. The test items have a form of the application of the skills in real life situations. The pilot testing was conducted at the selected lower secondary schools in Slovakia. The results from the pilot testing were used to specify the skill levels more precisely. From the evaluation, we can also see the current level of the skills and determine the prospective norm for following tests of skill development.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-0715-12 Research on the efficiency of innovative teaching methods in mathematics, physics and informatics education.

References

  1. Bilgin, I. The effects of hands-on activities incorporating a cooperative learning approach on eight grade students‘ science process skills and attitudes toward science. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 1(9). p. 27 – 37 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Beaumont-Walters Y and Soyibo K.: An analysis of high school students’ performance in five integrated science process skills. Research on Science and Technological Education. 19(2). 133-145 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120087687 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns, J. C., Okey, J. R., Wise, K. C.: Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169-177 (1985).  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220208 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dillashaw F.G and Okey J.R.: Test of the integrated science process skills for secondary students. Science education. 64, 601-608 (1980).  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730640506 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CERMAT: Hodnoceni vysledku vzdelavaní žáku 5. řočníku ZŠ 2006. Studijni dovednosti A. Didaktický test (2006). http://www.cermat.cz/ukazky-testu-1404034151.html
  6. Harlen, W.: Assessment & Inquiry-Based Science Education: Issues in Policy and Practice. Global Network of Science Academies (IAP) Science Education Programme (SEP) Trieste, Italy (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Lapitková, V. et al.: Fyzika pre 6. ročník základných škôl. 1.vyd. Bratislava: EXPOL PEDAGOGIKA (2010a)Google Scholar
  8. Lapitková, V. et al.: Fyzika pre 7. ročník základných škôl a 2. ročník gymnázia s osemročným štúdiom. 1.vyd. Bratislava: Didaktis (2010b)Google Scholar
  9. Lapitková, V. et al.: Fyzika pre 8. ročník základných škôl a 3. ročník gymnázia s osemročným štúdiom. 1.vyd. Martin: Vydavateľstvo Matice slovenskej (2012a)Google Scholar
  10. Lapitková, V. et al.: Fyzika pre 9. ročník základných škôl a 4. ročník gymnázia s osemročným štúdiom. 1.vyd. Bratislava: EXPOL PEDAGOGIKA (2012b)Google Scholar
  11. SAILS FP7 PROJECT. 7th General Programme of EU, FP7/2007-2013 based on the no. 289085 agreement. http://sails-project.eu/. Accessed 12 June 2018
  12. SPU: Fyzika – nižšie stredné vzdelávanie. (2015)Google Scholar
  13. Temiz, B. K., Tasar, M. F., Tan, M.: Development and Validation of a Multiple Format Test of Science Process Skills. International Education Journal, 7(7), 1007-1027 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Wenning, C.: Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), Winter 2007, pp. 21-24 (2007). Scientific Inquiry Literacy Test (ScInqLiT). http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/assessing_ScInq.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018
  15. Wenning, C. J.: Assessing nature-of-science literacy as one component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(4), 3-14 (2006). http://www2.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/publications/assessing_NOS.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katarína Krišková
    • 1
  • Marián Kireš
    • 2
  1. 1.Gymnázium KošiceKošiceSlovakia
  2. 2.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of Pavol Jozef ŠafarikKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations