Effects of ‘Blue-Regulated’ Full Spectrum LED Lighting in Clinician Wellness and Performance, and Patient Safety

  • Octavio L. PerezEmail author
  • Christopher Strother
  • Richard Vincent
  • Barbara Rabin
  • Harold Kaplan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 818)


Lighting has been recognized in the fields of human factors, ergonomics, and systems engineering, as an environmental factor that can affect wellness and performance, and the occurrence of medical error. Short wavelength (‘blue’) light is known to influence ‘non-visual’ effects of light in humans. These effects, that go beyond the pure ‘visual’ function, can affect human wellness and performance, as has been reported in previous scientific research. The aim and novelty of this research is to study the potentially beneficial ‘non-visual’ effects of lighting in the clinical environment to advance patient safety, and improve clinician wellness and performance.

The hypothesis of this study was that clinician wellness and performance in the execution of clinical procedures in the emergency department (ED) could be improved through controlled, indirect, ‘blue’-regulated, full visible spectrum, tunable, solid state, ‘white’ lighting.

To conduct our inquiry, we performed a crossover study with current ED clinicians that executed clinical procedures in a high-fidelity, simulated ED setting, under two different lighting conditions. We used the existing fluorescent lighting as the control condition. To provide the appropriate experimental lighting condition, we developed a novel multichannel lighting system for precise control and assessment of light delivery conditions, with specific emphasis in the short wavelength (blue light) spectral area.

The results of this study suggest that it is possible that indirect, ‘blue-enriched’, full visible spectrum, ‘white’ lighting, might reduce clinician sleepiness and workload perceptions, might reduce the execution time for clinical procedures, and the occurrence of medical error, while improving clinician wellness.

Future work would expand the scope of our study to advance patient safety in clinical scenarios where prevalence of adverse events has been observed, such as improvement in clinician cognitive recovery from medical error, hand-offs, and teamwork conditions. This study can also be translated to other fields of applications such as 24/7 control centers.


Blue-enriched lighting ipRGC Randomized control trial Human factors Visual ergonomics Healthcare ergonomics Emergency department Patient safety 


  1. 1.
    Akerstedt T, Gillberg M (1990) Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci 52(1–2):29–37Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andel C, Davidow SL, Hollander M, Moreno DA (2012) The economics of health care quality and medical errors. J Health Care Fin 39(1):39–50Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beauchemain KM, Hays P (1996) Sunny hospital rooms expedite recovery from severe and refractory depressions. J Affect Disord 40(1–2):49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beauchemin KM, Hays P (1998) Dying in the dark: sunshine, gender and outcomes in myocardial infarction. J R Soc Med 91(7):352–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benedetti F, Colombo C, Barbini B, Campori E, Smeraldi E (2001) Morning sunlight reduces length of hospitalization in bipolar depression. J Affect Disord 62(3):221–223. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchanan TL, Barker KN, Gibson JT, Jiang BC, Pearson RE (1991) Illumination and errors in dispensing. Am J Health Syst Pharmacy 48(10):2137–2145Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Canellas F, Mestre L, Belber M, Frontera G, Rey MA, Rial R (2015) Increased daylight availability reduces length of hospitalisation in depressive patients. Eur Archiv Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 266(3):277–280.
  8. 8.
    Carayon P (2012) Emerging role of human factors and ergonomics in healthcare delivery–a new field of application and influence for the IEA. Work 41(Suppl. 1):5037–5040Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carayon P, Xie A, Kianfar S (2013) Human factors and ergonomics. In: Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments 211. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
  10. 10.
    Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Joy Rivera-Rodriguez A, Schoofs Hundt A, Hoonakker P, Holden R, Gurses AP (2014) Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Appl Ergon 45(1):14–25. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choi J-H, Beltran LO, Kim H-S (2012) Impacts of indoor daylight environments on patient average length of stay (ALOS) in a healthcare facility. Build Environ 50:65–75. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalke H, Little J, Niemann E, Camgoz N, Steadman G, Hill S, Stott L (2006) Colour and lighting in hospital design. Opt Laser Technol 38(4–6):343–365. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hart SG (2006) NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the human factors and engineering society (HFES) 50th annual meeting, vol 50, pp 904–908. Sage Publications, San Francisco, California.
  14. 14.
    Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, vol 52, pp 139–183Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hommes V, Giménez MC (2015) A revision of existing Karolinska sleepiness scale responses to light: a melanopic perspective. Chronobiol Int 32(6):750–756.
  16. 16.
    Iyendo TO, Uwajeh PC, Ikenna ES (2016) The therapeutic impacts of environmental design interventions on wellness in clinical settings: a narrative review. Complement Ther Clin Pract 24:174–188. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joarder MAR, Price ADF, Mourshed M (2009) Systematic study of the therapeutic impact of daylight associated with clinical recovery.
  18. 18.
    Joarder A, Price A (2013) Impact of daylight illumination on reducing patient length of stay in hospital after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Light Res Technol 45(4):435–449.
  19. 19.
    Levin S, France DJ, Hemphill R, Jones I, Chen KY, Rickard D, Makowski R, Aronsky D (2006) Tracking workload in the emergency department. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 48(3):526–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li T, Yu T, Hawkins BS, Dickersin K (2015) Design, analysis, and reporting of crossover trials for inclusion in a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0133023.
  21. 21.
    Long J (2014) What is visual ergonomics? Work 47(3):287–289. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Senn S (2002) Cross-over trials in clinical research. Statistics in practice. Second edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Senn S, Lee S (2004) The analysis of the AB/BA cross-over trial in the medical literature. Pharm Stat 3(2):123–131. Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tanja-Dijkstra K, Pieterse ME (2011) The psychological effects of the physical healthcare environment on healthcare personnel. In: Cochrane database of systematic reviews, Issue 1. The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom, 19 January 2011.
  25. 25.
    Tengroth B (1984) Ergophthalmology. Acta Ophthalmol 62(S161): 13–16Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ulrich R (1984) View through a window may influence recovery. Science 224(4647):224–225. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walch JM, Rabin BS, Day R, Williams JN, Choi K, Kang JD (2005) The effect of sunlight on postoperative analgesic medication use: a prospective study of patients undergoing spinal surgery. Psychosom Med 67(1):156–163. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA (2009) Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet 374(9702):1714–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wellek S, Blettner M (2012) On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109:276–281Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Emergency MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations