Advertisement

Ergonomics Intervening Cases in Hospitals for Patient Safety Improvement

  • Chih-Wei Lu
  • Yan-Teng Lian
  • Hsun-Hsiang Liao
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 818)

Abstract

Due to several medical accidents breaking out, patient safety is getting more emphasis. People have raised attention to ergonomics approach to improve patient safety. This study is to evaluate the situation of ergonomics intervening medication for patient safety improvement cases and provide the advanced human factors knowledge to medication in hospitals and to reduce the risk of human error in hospitals. The cases are collected from Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation (TJCHA). The cases have been reorganized by the domains view of ergonomics (physical ergonomics, cognitive ergonomics and organizational Ergonomics); graded by the level how they approach of ergonomics and quantified to do statistical analysis. The results shows that percentage distribution of ergonomics knowledge using for medication safety promotional, ensuring infection control and improving operations Safety, such as the results shows that percentage distribution of ergonomics knowledge using for medication safety promotional are physical ergonomics (5.41%), cognitive ergonomics (21.62%) and organizational Ergonomics (72.97%). Some recommendations for increasing medication safety have been presented to all levels of medical institutions for reference study.

Keywords

Ergonomics Patient safety improvement Hospitals 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The study term thanks for the help and award from the hospitals and the Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation (TJCHA). Moreover, are also thanks funding from the MOST of Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology). The funding codes are 105-2221-E-033-038- and 106-2221-E-033-038-MY3.

References

  1. 1.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds). To Err is human: building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077248
  2. 2.
    Chihwei L (2014) Special experiences- using ergonomics or human factor engineering in medical care systems. J Healthc Qual 8(6):17–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Definition and Domains of Ergonomics. http://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html
  4. 4.
    Bird FE, Germain GL (1996) Practical loss control leadership, Det Norske Verita. Loganville, GA. LNCS Homepage. http://www.springer.com/lncs. Accessed 21 Nov 2016
  5. 5.
    Ben-Tzion K, Roger B (2010) Macroergonomics and patient safety: the impact of levels on theory measurement, analysis and intervention in patient safety research. Appl Ergon 41(5):674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bridger RS (2008) Human error, accidents, and safety. Introduction to ergonomics, 607–655Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gavriel S (2012) Human factors and ergonomics in health care. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 1575–1589Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blackman HS, Gertman DI, Boring RL (2008) Human error quantification using performance shaping factors in the spar-h method. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 52, p 1733Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kleiner BM (2006) Macroergonomics: analysis and design of work systems. Appl Ergon 37(2006):81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial System and Engineering ChungYuan Christian UniversityTaoyuan CityTaiwan
  2. 2.Taiwan Joint Commissions on Hospital Accreditation (TJCHA)New Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations