Pushing Induced Sliding Perturbation Affects Postural Responses to Maintain Balance Standing

  • Yun-Ju LeeEmail author
  • Bing Chen
  • Jing-Nong Liang
  • Alexander S. Aruin
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 819)


Pushing is considered a manual handling activity in industry and its functional role is also in our daily life, such as pushing moving strollers or grocery carts, which is under examined. In such situations, two perturbations need to be handled simultaneously, specifically, pushing (voluntary movement) and pushing-induced slipping when walking on a slip surface (sliding perturbation). Eight participants were instructed to push a handle while standing on a locked or unlocked movable board, which was placed on a force plate. Three accelerometers were attached to the handle to detect the moment of the handle moving away (Thandle), which denotes time zero, the pelvis to detect the moment of trunk movement, and the movable board to detect the moment of board movement. The onset time, magnitude of center of pressure (COP) at Thandle and maximum pushing force were calculated. The onsets of board movement, trunk movement, and COP were initiated prior to Thandle. Pushing while standing on the unlocked sliding board significantly affected the onset of COP but did not affect onset of trunk movement. In addition, the direction of acceleration on the board was corresponding to the reaction force of the pushing forces at hands in the backward direction. Studying the combined effects of varying movability of the support surface and pushing tasks may contribute to the development of new environment safety for workers and elderly.


Pushing force Sliding surface Occupational biomechanics Balance 


  1. 1.
    Chaffin DB, Andres RO, Garg A (1983) Volitional postures during maximal push/pull exertions in the sagittal plane. Hum Factors 25(5):541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lavender SA et al (1998) Trunk muscle use during pulling tasks: effects of a lifting belt and footing conditions. Hum Factors 40(1):159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grieve DW (1983) Slipping due to manual exertion. Ergonomics 26(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoozemans MJ et al (1998) Pushing and pulling in relation to musculoskeletal disorders: a review of risk factors. Ergonomics 41(6):757–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boocock MG et al (2006) Initial force and postural adaptations when pushing and pulling on floor surfaces with good and reduced resistance to slipping. Ergonomics 49(9):801–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee YJ, Aruin AS (2013) Three components of postural control associated with pushing in symmetrical and asymmetrical stance. Exp Brain Res 228(3):341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee YJ, Aruin AS (2014) Isolated and combined effects of asymmetric stance and pushing movement on the anticipatory and compensatory postural control. Clin Neurophysiol 125(4):768–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee YJ, Aruin AS (2015) Effects of asymmetrical stance and movement on body rotation in pushing. J Biomech 48(2):283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shiratori T, Latash M (2000) The roles of proximal and distal muscles in anticipatory postural adjustments under asymmetrical perturbations and during standing on rollerskates. Clin Neurophysiol 111(4):613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietz V et al (2000) Effects of changing stance conditions on anticipatory postural adjustment and reaction time to voluntary arm movement in humans. J Physiol 524(Pt 2):617–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen B, Lee YJ, Aruin AS (2018) Standing on a sliding board affects generation of anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 38:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee YJ, Chen B, Aruin AS (2015) Older adults utilize less efficient postural control when performing pushing task. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 25(6):966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Talini D et al (2017) Effects of the work limitations on the career path of a cohort of health workers. Med Lav 108(6):434–445Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Zhou P, Aruin AS (2007) Teager-Kaiser energy operation of surface EMG improves muscle activity onset detection. Ann Biomed Eng 35(9):1532–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winter DA et al (1996) Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance. J Neurophysiol 75(6):2334–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muller ML, Redfern MS (2004) Correlation between EMG and COP onset latency in response to a horizontal platform translation. J Biomech 37(10):1573–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nardone A, Schieppati M (1988) Postural adjustments associated with voluntary contraction of leg muscles in standing man. Exp Brain Res 69(3):469–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Runge CF et al (1999) Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait Posture 10(2):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alexandrov AV, Frolov AA, Massion J (2001) Biomechanical analysis of movement strategies in human forward trunk bending. II. Experimental study. Biol Cybern 84(6):435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oddsson LI (1990) Control of voluntary trunk movements in man. Mechanisms for postural equilibrium during standing. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 595:1–60Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torres-Oviedo G, Ting LH (2007) Muscle synergies characterizing human postural responses. J Neurophysiol 98(4):2144–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee WA, Michaels CF, Pai YC (1990) The organization of torque and EMG activity during bilateral handle pulls by standing humans. Exp Brain Res 82(2):304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muller ML, Redfern MS, Jennings JR (2007) Postural prioritization defines the interaction between a reaction time task and postural perturbations. Exp Brain Res 183(4):447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shumway-Cook A, et al (1997) The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 52(4):M232-40Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen B, Lee YJ, Aruin AS (2016) Control of grip force and vertical posture while holding an object and being perturbed. Exp Brain Res 234(11):3193–3201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mitra S (2004) Adaptive utilization of optical variables during postural and suprapostural dual-task performance: comment on Stoffregen, Smart, Bardy, and Pagulayan (1999). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30(1):28–38MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bateni H et al (2004) Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping? Exp Brain Res 157(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yun-Ju Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bing Chen
    • 2
  • Jing-Nong Liang
    • 3
  • Alexander S. Aruin
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering ManagementNational Tshing-Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis Lois Pope Life CenterUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of Nevada Las VegasLas VegasUSA
  4. 4.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations