Static Postural Stability on Narrow Platforms to Prevent Occupational Stepladder Falls

  • Atsushi SugamaEmail author
  • Akihiko Seo
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 819)


Falls from heights are the most common causes of occupational fatal accidents in many countries; using agents, such as stepladders or scaffolds, is one of the main causal factor. This study aims to evaluate the postural stability of static standing on narrow platforms. Eleven male participants stood on five platforms that had anterior/posterior widths ranging from 6 to 25 cm and maintained their position for 50 s. The coordinates and velocities of center of mass (CoM) and center of pressure (CoP) were calculated from kinematic data of human body and foot reaction forces. The results showed that the relative position of CoP to the platform width and the translational velocity non-linearly increased with shortened platform width and more significantly changed than the relative position of CoM, while there was no significant difference between the 15-cm and 25-cm platforms. The regression lines of the relative position and the velocity of CoP were approximated as a function of the inverse of the platform width or the square, respectively. Shortened platforms make the postural balance of static standing non-linearly unstable, whereas platforms that are 15 cm or wider stabilize the postural perturbation comparable to that achieved on the ground. Therefore, the equipment with a platform or rungs at least 15 cm or wider should be recommended for tasks at elevated places.


Postural stability Falls from height Occupational safety Stepladder 



The authors would like to thank I. Moriya for technical assistance with the experiments. This work is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K12995.


  1. 1.
    Nadhim EA, Hon C, Xia B, Stewart I, Fang D (2016) Falls from height in the construction industry: a critical review of the scientific literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:638–657. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simeonov P (2017) Ladder safety: research, control, and practice. In: Hsiao H (ed) Fall prevention and protection, principles, guidelines, and practices. CRC Press, New York, pp 241–269Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sugama A, Ohnishi A (2015) Occupational accidents due to stepladders in Japan: analysis of industry and injured characteristics. Procedia Manuf 3:6632–6638. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Björnstig U, Johnsson J (1992) Ladder injuries: mechanisms, injuries and consequences. J Saf Res 23:9–18. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang X, Hinze J (2003) Analysis of construction worker fall accidents. J Constr Eng Manag 129:262–271. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seluga KJ, Ojalvo IU, Obert RM (2007) Analysis and testing of a hidden stepladder hazard – excessive twist flexibility. Int J Contr Saf Promot 14:215–224. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang BS, Ashton-Miller JA (2005) Factors affecting stepladder stability during a lateral weight transfer: a study in healthy young adults. Appl Ergon 36:601–607. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Axelsson PO, Carter N (1995) Measures to prevent portable ladder accidents in the construction industry. Ergonomics 38:250–259. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen HH, Lin LJ (1991) A scenario analysis of ladder fall accidents. J Saf Res 22:31–39. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (2013) Motor control: translating research into clinical practice, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DiDomenico A, Nussbaum MA (2005) Interactive effects of mental and postural demands on subjective assessment of mental workload and postural stability. Saf Sci 43:485–495. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirby RL, Price NA, MacLeod DA (1987) The influence of foot position on standing balance. J Biomech 20:423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sugama A, Seo A (2017) Postural stability of static standing on narrow platform for stepladder safety. Jpn J Ergon 53:125–132 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO 7250-1:2017. Basic human body measurements for technological design – Part 1: Body measurement definitions and landmarksGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak K (1998) Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol 80:1211–1221. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chaffin DB, Andersson GBJ, Martin BJ (2006) Occupational Biomechanics, 4th edn. Wiley-Interscience, pp 37–51Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Michiyoshi A, Hai-peng T, Takashi Y (1992) Estimation of inertia properties of the body segments in Japanese athletes. J Soc Biomech 11:23–33. (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, JapanKiyoseJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of System DesignTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHinoJapan

Personalised recommendations