Advertisement

Social Networks Applied to Zika and H1N1 Epidemics: A Systematic Review

  • Diná Herdi Medeiros de Araujo
  • Elaine Alves de Carvalho
  • Claudia Lage Rebello da Motta
  • Marcos Roberto da Silva Borges
  • José Orlando Gomes
  • Paulo Victor Rodrigues de Carvalho
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 819)

Abstract

Background: Health crises and health emergencies occur regionally and globally. In this context, online social networks are technical resources widely used to share large amounts of information with increasing reach and speed. This capacity of dissemination of information on epidemics through social media interactions creates the possibility of collaboration between population and health professionals or agencies. This article intends to present, through results obtained in a systematic review, examples on how social interactions enable collaboration in health surveillance to treat the epidemic situations of Zika and H1N1.

Methodology: The methodology applied in this article was the systematic review, to answer how social networks are being applied in a collaborative context to assist in the identification, monitoring and generation of information on Zika Virus and H1N1 epidemics

Results: The works presented demonstrated that social media interactions are important tools for the rapid dissemination of information at low cost, reaching audiences who need clarification, and also favoring the formation of specific collaborative networks among researchers, in the monitoring and generation of epidemiological information for making decision.

Conclusion: Collaboration through social networks as pointed out in the papers is an essential aspect to connect individuals with common interests, generating information that allows the monitoring and control of epidemics, as well as creating networks of research for the development of science in the service of life.

Keywords

Social media Collaboration in health Health surveillance Zika H1N1 Twitter Facebook Instagram 

References

  1. 1.
    Abbdullah S, Wu X (2011) An epidemic model for news spreading on twitter. In: 2011 International conference on tools with artificial intelligence, Proceedings, Vermont. IEEE Xplore, pp 163–169Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Achrekar H, Gandhe A, Lazarus R, Yu SH, Liu B (2011) Predicting flu trends using twitter data. In: IEEE conference on computer communications workshops, INFOCOM WKSHPS, pp 702–707Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-garadi MA, Khan MS, Varathan KD, Mujtaba G, Al-Kabsi AM (2016) Using online social networks to track a pandemic: a systematic review. J Biomed Inf 62:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antunes MN, et al (2016) Visual archives concerning Zika virus: images on Instagram as part of the constitution of an epidemic memory. e-ISSN 1981-6278Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Avery EJ (2017) Public information officers’ social media monitoring during the Zika virus crisis, a global health threat surrounded by public uncertainty. Public Relat Rev 43(3):468–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benson FG, Musekiwa A, Blumberg L, Rispel LC (2016) Survey of the perceptions of key stakeholders on the attributes of the South African notifiable diseases surveillance system. BMC Public Health 16(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brazil. The Ministry of Health. The Secretary of Health Surveillance (2005) Basic course of epidemiological surveillance. Ministry of Health, BrasiliaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byrd K, Mansurov A, Baysal O (2016) Mining twitter data for influenza detection and surveillance. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on software engineering in healthcare systems - SEHS 2016, pp 43–49Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Callaghan CW (2016) Disaster management, crowdsourced R&D and probabilistic innovation theory: toward real time disaster response capabilityGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castells M (2005) The Network Society. vol 1 Trad. Roneide Venancio Majer in collaboration with Klauss Brandini Gerhardt. 8 ed. Peace and land, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Centola D (2013) Social media and the science of health behavior. Circulation 127(21):2135–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chauhan A (2014) Online media use and adoption by hurricane sandy affected fire and police departments. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Paper 3895Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chew C, Eysenbach G (2010) Pandemics in the age of Twitter: the content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE 5(11):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dai X, Bikdash M (2016) Distance-based outliers method for detecting disease outbreaks using social media. In: Conference proceedings - IEEE SoutheastCon (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Development and history of Influenza A H1N1 in Brazil. http://www.efdeportes.com. Accessed 28 May 2017
  16. 16.
    Donelle L, Booth RG (2013) Health tweets: an exploration of health promotion on twitter. Online J Issues Nurs 17(3)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fiocruz (2012) Manual of Social Media Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Coordination of Social Communication/President of FiocruzGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuks H, Pimentel M (2011) Groupware systems. Elsevier, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Smolin MS, Brilliant L (2009) Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nat Int Wkly J Sci 457:1012Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glynn RW, Boland M (2016) Ebola, Zika and the international health regulations - implications for port health preparedness. Globalization and Health 12(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gui X, et al (2017) Managing uncertainty: using social media for risk assessment during a public health crisis. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 4520–4533Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Halse SE, et al (2016) Tweet factors influencing trust and usefulness during both man-made and natural disasters. In: ISCRAMGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hempel M (2014) The use of social media in environmental health research and communication: an evidence review. Environmental Public Health, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Highlights The Fiocruz (2016) Presentation of the results of the networkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jain V, Kumar S (2017) Effective surveillance and predictive mapping of mosquito-borne diseases using social media. In: IEEE 19th international conference on e-Health networkingGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jatoba A, Burns CM, Vidal MCR, Carvalho PVR (2016) Designing for risk assessment systems for patient triage in primary health care: a literature review. JMIR Hum Factors 3(2):e21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kadri SM, Trapp-Petty M (2016) The Zika virus fight on social media. Arch Clin Microbiol 7:3Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khatua A, Khatua A (2016) Immediate and long-term effects of 2016 Zika outbreak: a twitter-based study. In: 2016 IEEE 18th international conference on e-Health networking, applications and services, Healthcom (CDC)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klein GH, Pedro GN, Rafael T (2017) Big data and social media: monitoring of networks as a management tool. Health Soc 26(1):208–217Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee K, Agrawal A, Choudhary A (2017) Forecasting influenza levels using real-time social media streams. In: Proceedings - 2017 IEEE international conference on healthcare informatics. ICHI, pp 409–414Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lima SGP, et al (2015) The use of social networks in the digital area of health: a systematic review of health and research, vol 8, Special Edition, pp 79–91Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mackey TK (2016) The Ebola outbreak: catalyzing a “shift” in global health governance? BMC Infect Dis 16(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mahecha MP, Ojeda E, Vega DA, Sarmiento-Monroy JC, Anaya JM (2017) Guillain-Barré syndrome in Colombia: where do we stand now? Immunol Res 65(1):72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Medronho RA (1995) Geoprocessing and health: a new approach to space in health-illness process. ISTC/Nect/Fiocruz, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morens DM, Fauci AS (2016) Zika Virus Infection and Zika- Associated With Fetal/Microcephaly: General Update to Chapter 233: Arthropod-Borne and Rodent-Borne Virus InfectionsGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rojek AM, Horby PW (2016) Modernising epidemic science: enabling patient-centred research during epidemics. BMC Med 14(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schwartz J, Yen MY (2017) Toward a collaborative model of pandemic preparedness and response: Taiwan’s changing approach to pandemics. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 50(2):125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sharma M, Yadav K, Yadav N, Ferdinand KC (2017) Zika virus pandemic - analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. Am J Infect Control 45(3):301–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Social Network. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rede_social. Accessed 25 May 2017
  41. 41.
    Villa R (2016) Zika, or the burden of uncertainty. La Clin Ther 167(1):7–9MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    WHO - World Health Organization. Zika virus. http://www.who.int/topics/Zika/en/. Accessed 03 May 2017
  43. 43.
    Winston ER, Medlin BD, Romaniello BA (2012) An e-patient’s end-user community (EUCY): the value added of social network applications. Comput Hum Behav 28(3):951–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diná Herdi Medeiros de Araujo
    • 1
  • Elaine Alves de Carvalho
    • 1
  • Claudia Lage Rebello da Motta
    • 1
  • Marcos Roberto da Silva Borges
    • 1
  • José Orlando Gomes
    • 1
  • Paulo Victor Rodrigues de Carvalho
    • 1
  1. 1.Programa de Pós Graduação em InformáticaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro PPGI/UFRJRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations