Advertisement

Development an Office Ergonomic Risk Checklist: Composite Office Ergonomic Risk Assessment (CERA Office)

  • Gyula Szabó
  • Edit Németh
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 819)

Abstract

Despite the continuous efforts the burden of work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (wMSDs) hasn’t been eliminated. Ergonomics risk assessment tools had been often developed on causes of different occupational diseases related to different body parts, and implemented in various forms ranging from paper-pencil worksheets to immersed virtual reality simulations.

The Composite Ergonomic Risk Assessment (CERA) was developed to assess ergonomic risks and determine intervention points by Hungarian experts for industrial and office workplaces, according to the EN 1005 Safety of machinery - Human physical performance standard.

Professionals with different background e.g. OSH specialists, occupational doctors, ergonomist participated in the development and evaluation process of CERA Office when various risk assessment methods had been tested.

The objectives of the new tool was to provide a reliable but quick health risks assessment of computer workplaces and define correction measures and improvement action plans according to different risk levels.

In the pilot period 20 different office tasks were assessed by the new risk assessment method as well as with three already widely accepted and used risk assessment tools. The control tools was Cornell University’s Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires (CMDQ), the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA).

The statistical analysis highlighted that CERA Office tends to result on higher risk than the traditional tools. This alteration is due to the higher attention demand required by CERA Office on evaluators to analyse the movements, postures, activities more precise. CERA Office discovered weaknesses of workstations which was not identified by traditional methods used by not-proficient evaluators.

The added value of CERA Office is the collection of well defied work situations requiring intervention. CERA Office is an example to efficient and reliable ways to identify the ergonomic risks of office workplaces.

Keywords

Composite Ergonomic Risk Assessment (CERA) Office ergonomics wMSD Checklists 

References

  1. 1.
    Directive 90/270/EEC - display screen equipment of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szabó, Gy (2012) Evaluation and prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Hungary. In: Ahran TZ, Waldemar K (eds) Advances in physical ergonomics and safety. CRC Press - Taylor and Francis Group, Orlando, pp 195–202Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Szabó Gy, Mischinger G (2013) Just an other ergonomic tool: the ‘Composite Ergonomic Risk Assessment’. In: Mijović B, Čubrić IS, Čubrić G, Sušić A (eds) Ergonomics 2013: 5th international ergonomics conference. Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Zadar, pp 169–174Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Szabó Gy (2014) ErgoCapture – a motion capture based ergonomics risk assessment tool. In: Abraham T, Karwowsky W, Marek T (szerk.) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics 2014 and the affiliated conferences, Krakow, pp 8023–8031Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szabó Gy (2017) Composite ergonomic risk assessment of municipal manual waste sorting. In: 8th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics, Los Angeles, California, USA (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    EN 1005-4:2005 + A1:2008 Safety of machinery - Human physical performance - Part 4: Evaluation of working postures and movements in relation to machineryGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erdinc O, Hot K, Özkaya M (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ), Research reportGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hignett S, McAtamney L (2000) Rapid entire body assessment: REBA. Appl Ergon 31:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sonne MWL, Villalta DL, Andrews D (2012) Development and evaluation of an office ergonomic risk checklist: the rapid office strain assessment (ROSA). Appl Ergon 43(1):98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Donát Bánki Faculty of Mechanical and Safety EngineeringÓbuda UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Federation of European Ergonomics Societies (FEES)BudapestHungary
  3. 3.Institute of Business EconomicsEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations