Advertisement

Injury Claims from Steep Slope Logging in the United States

  • John Rosecrance
  • Elise Lagerstrom
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 820)

Abstract

Logging is one of the most dangerous occupations in the United States. Although logging injuries within the U.S. have decreased over the last 20 years, injuries in this sector continue to exceed the rate of total recordable cases for all U.S. industries combined. Methods: Workers’ Compensation injury claim data from two workers’ compensation providers, which cover companies’ active in the logging industry of Montana and Idaho were obtained. All injury and fatality claims occurring from July 2010 to June 2014 were obtained from companies in the logging industry (NAICS 113). Injury claim data from each company contained information on demographics, variables related to the time, type and source, of injury, as well as the cost associated with each injury claim. Results: A total of 801 workers’ compensation claims were analyzed for the time period July 2010 to June 2015. The most common nature of injury were sprain/strain injuries, followed by contusions, and lacerations. Inexperienced workers (>6 months experience) accounted for over 25% of claims. Fatalities had the highest median claim cost ($274,411 USD). Conclusions: Injury prevention efforts in the logging industry within the Intermountain region should be focused on early training, engineering controls, and administrative controls; all designed to promote a culture and climate of safety, communication, and shared responsibility. The results of this project were used as the basis and justification for the development and implementation targeted safety interventions addressing the specific safety issues associated with logging in the Intermountain region.

Keywords

Logging Injuries Fatalities Costs Workers’ compensation Claims 

References

  1. Albizu-Urionabarrenetxea P, Tolosana-Esteban E, Roman-Jordan E (2013) Safety and health in forest harvesting operations. Diagnosis and preventive actions. A review. For Syst 22(3):392–400Google Scholar
  2. Bell JL (2002) Changes in logging injury rates associated with use of feller-bunchers in West Virginia. J Safety Res 33(4):463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bordas RM, Davis GA, Hopkins BL, Thomas RE, Rummer RB (2001) Documentation of hazards and safety perceptions for mechanized logging operations in East Central Alabama. J Agric Safety Health 7(2):113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016) CPI Inflation CalculatorGoogle Scholar
  5. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017) Logging workers had highest rate of fatal work injuries in 2015. The Economics DailyGoogle Scholar
  6. Laschi A, Marchi E, Foderi C, Neri F (2016) Identifying causes, dynamics and consequences of work accidents in forest operations in an alpine context. Saf Sci 89:28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.05.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lefort J, Albert J, de Hoop CF, Pine JC, Marx BD (2003) Characteristics of injuries in the logging industry of Louisiana, USA: 1986 to 1998. Int J For Eng 14(2)Google Scholar
  8. Malehi AS, Pourmotahari F, Angali KA (2015) Statistical models for the analysis of skewed healthcare cost data: a simulation study. Health Econ Rev 5(1):11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0045-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Myers JR, Fosbroke DE (1994) Logging fatalities in the united states by region, cause of death, and other factors — 1980 through 1988. J Safety Res 25(2):97–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(94)90021-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2015) Employer-Reported Workplace Injuries and Illnesses-2014. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm#14Summary_News_Release
  11. United States Department of Labor (2015) Industries at a Glance: Forestry and Logging: NAICS 113. http://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag113.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations