Advertisement

Allocation of Blame for Property Damage Originating in a Cigarette Receptacle Constructed from Flammable HDPE

  • Michael J. Kalsher
  • Hayley McCullough
  • William G. Obenauer
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 821)

Abstract

Human factors and Ergonomics (HFE) researchers have systematically investigated how people allocate responsibility in product liability cases in which people have been seriously injured or killed. Previous research has shown how blame is assigned in a broad range of user injury contexts and to an array of potentially blameworthy entities. We extend this research to investigate allocation of blame for an incident involving substantial property damage, but no user injuries or deaths. Participants read a realistic scenario based on an actual product liability case in which a warehouse sustained more than one-million dollars in damage from a fire that originated in a receptacle designed for disposal of lit smoking materials (e.g., cigarettes) positioned near the building. The scenario systematically varied quality of the product warning (original manufacturer’s warning vs. a more comprehensive redesigned warning) and whether the manufacturer and the product’s distributor lied or did not lie to purchasers and end-users (smokers) about design limitations of the receptacle. Overall, the pattern of results from the property-damage scenario closely mirrored previous research involving serious injury or death. Consistent with previous research in this area, the product manufacturer received significantly less blame when it provided a redesigned warning about the product’s hazard. Interestingly, given the more comprehensive warning, blame was shifted disproportionately away from the manufacturer and toward the purchaser, not the other entities. Candor on the part of the manufacturer and distributor—when these entities provided accurate information—resulted in less blame assigned to them compared to when they either withheld this critical information or provided information that was misleading. Consequently, these findings add to the growing body of evidence indicating multiple benefits of safety.

Keywords

Warnings Safety Allocation of responsibility Product liability Misleading 

References

  1. 1.
    Shaver KG (1985) The attribution of blame: causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karlovac M, Darley JM Attribution of responsibility for accidents: a negligence law analogy. Soc Cogn 6(4):287–318Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iyengar S (1990) Framing responsibility for political issues: the case of poverty. Polit Behav 12(1):19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Skitka LJ, Tetlock PE (1993) Of ants and grasshoppers: the political psychology of allocating public assistance. In: Mellers BA, Baron J (eds) Psychological perspectives on justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 205–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lane RE (2000) Moral blame and causal explanation. J Appl Psychol 17(1):45–58Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pottick KJ, Davis DM (2001) Attributions of responsibility: parents and professionals at odds. Am J Orthopsychiatry 71(3):66–84Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalsher MJ, Viale AJ, Williams KJ (2003) Separating the effects of warning and information distribution practices: a case of cascading responsibility. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, vol 47, pp 1721–1725Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalsher MJ, Williams KJ, Murphy S (2001) Allocating blame for airbag deployment injuries: separating manufacturers’ blame from personal responsibility. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, vol 45, pp 1458–1462Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laughery KR, Lovvoll DR, McQuilkin ML (1996) Allocation of responsibility for child safety. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, vol 40, pp 810–813Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams KJ, Kalsher MJ, Maru M, Wogalter MS (2000) Emphasizing non-obvious hazards using multi-frame pictorials and color on allocation of blame. In: Proceedings of the international ergonomics association and the human factors and ergonomics society congress, vol 4, pp 124–127Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalsher MJ, Phoenix GM, Wogalter MS, Braun CC (1998) How do people attribute blame for burns sustained from hot coffee? The role of causal attributions. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, vol 42, pp 651–655Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Kalsher
    • 1
  • Hayley McCullough
    • 1
  • William G. Obenauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations