Advertisement

New Public Management, Performance Measurement, and Reconfiguration of Work in the Public Sector

  • Bruno César Kawasaki
  • Ruri Giannini
  • Selma Lancman
  • Laerte Idal Sznelwar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 821)

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss performance measurement systems in public organizations and their effects on both public sector workers and quality of the services provided to the population. Although performance measurement is often regarded as prerequisite for an efficient provision of public services in the context of New Public Management, a review of academic studies actually shows that its consequences on work and organizational performance are inconsistent and potentially deleterious. Hence our core questions are: how performance measurement became widespread in public sector? Which are the critical aspects in the design and use of performance measurement systems, regarding their relation to workers’ activities? How can they positively or negatively impact behaviours, tasks and activities, and relationships among workers? We discuss these questions based on the literature of public sector and ergonomics. Then, we present a case study that illustrates how performance measurement impacted the work of labour judges. Despite difficulties in accurately assessing or predicting the effects of performance measurement, managers can be benefited by considering their benefits, risks, and limitations.

Keywords

New Public Management Performance measurement Work evaluation 

References

  1. Abrahão JI, Sznelwar LI, Silvino A, Sarmet M, Pinho D (2009) Introdução à Ergonomia: da prática à teoria. Blucher, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke J, Gewirtz S, McLaughlin E (2000) Reinventing the welfare state. In: Clarke J, Gewirtz S, McLaughlin E (eds) New managerialism, new welfare? SAGE Publications Ltd, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  3. Curristine T, Lonti Z, Joumard I (2007) Improving public sector efficiency: challenges and opportunities. OECD J Budgeting 7(1)Google Scholar
  4. Davies J (2018) “Outcome” assessment: what exactly are we measuring? a personal reflection on measuring the outcomes from competition agencies’ interventions. De Economist 166(1):7–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-017-9307-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deming WE (1993) The new economics: for industry, government, education. MIT-CAES, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Fleetwood S, Hesketh A (2011) Explaining the performance of human resource management. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Guérin F, Laville A, Daniellou F, Duraffourg J, Kerguelen A (1997) Comprendre le travail pour le transformer: la pratique de l’ergonomie. ANACT, Montrouge, Hauts-de-SeineGoogle Scholar
  8. Hood C (2012) Public management by numbers as a performance-enhancing drug: two hypotheses. Public Adm Rev 72(s1)Google Scholar
  9. Lacombe BMB, Albuquerque LG (2008) Evaluation and measurement in human resource management: a study in Brazil. Revista de Administração 43(1):5–16Google Scholar
  10. Morin E (1990) Science avec conscience. Points sciencesGoogle Scholar
  11. Wright BE (2001) Public-sector work motivation: a review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. J Public Adm Res Theory 11(4):559–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polytechnic School of the University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Medical School of the University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations