Advertisement

Difficulties of the Modern Work Style in Office Environment

  • Fruzsina Pataki-Bittó
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 821)

Abstract

This Hungarian research is investigating the personal experiences of communication and collaboration at work, and aims to identify the related factors that influence the job satisfaction and the performance of the employees. Information was collected from eleven depth interviews in order to explore and compass the topic in details and understand the connections between the problems of the respondents and their work environment (work environment refers to both physical and communication environment). Therefore respondents were chosen from different office environments, varied by the size of the offices (from three workstations in a room to open-plan office) and by the type of the organizations (multinational and Hungarian companies, state-owned institutions). The interviews covered the topics of work environment, work conditions, work style, working habits (e.g. preferred hours to work on cognitive load tasks), and the personal factors that influence work efficiency. Regarding interruption overload, the different types of interruptions were discussed during the interviews to investigate the personal strategies used in order to focus on work.

The result of the research shows that the lack of functional spaces is a common issue regarding the physical environment, but there are other problems related directly to communication channels and forms. The preference of personal communication and the importance of social interactions at work were also highlighted even though respondents realized that personal inquires often keep them from effective work.

Keywords

Modern office environment Collaboration Office interruptions 

References

  1. 1.
    Zerella S, Von Treuer K, Albrecht S (2017) The influence of office layout features on employee perception of organizational culture. J Environ Psychol 54:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Croon E, Sluiter J, Kuijer PP (2005) The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics 48(2):119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nichols J, Wobbrock JO, Gergle D, Forlizzi J (2002) Mediator and medium: doors as interruption gateways and aesthetic displays. In: 4th conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, proceedings paper, pp 379–386Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seddigh A, Stenfors C, Berntsson E, Bååth R (2015) The association between office design and performance on demanding cognitive tasks. J Environ Psychol 42:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janssen CP, Gould SJJ, Li SYW, Brumby DP, Cox AL (2015) Integrating knowledge of multitasking and interruptions across different perspectives and research methods. Int J Hum Comput Stud 79:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scholl J, Hasvold P, Henriksen E, Ellingsen G (2007) Managing communication availability and interruptions: a study of mobile communication in an oncology department. In: LaMarca A, Langheinrich M, Truong KN (eds) Pervasive Computing 2007. LNCS 4480, pp 234–250. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiberg M, Whittaker S (2005) Managing availability: supporting lightweight negotiations to handle interruptions. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 12(4):356–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rothe PM, Beijer M (2011) Most important aspects of the work environment. In: Proceedings of the 10th EuroFM research symposium, pp 1–12, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perlow L, Weeks J (2002) Who’s helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior. J Organ Behav 23:345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw Hill Professional, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofstede Insights Homepage. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/hungary. Accessed 19 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ergonomics and PsychologyBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations