Advertisement

Virtual Simulations for Incorporating Ergonomics into Design Projects: Opportunities and Limitations of Different Media and Approaches

  • Esdras Paravizo
  • Daniel Braatz
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 821)

Abstract

Throughout the design process, project actors rely on a variety of artifacts for fostering creativity, communication and make-sensing among the project team. Among those artefacts are virtual simulations, achieved using different types of software in which different scenarios and configurations of the future situation can be discussed and tested out. In this paper, we aim to achieve a better understanding on how Ergonomics research and practice can benefit from utilizing computer-based simulation, especially using “CAD”, “Game Engines”, “Discrete Event Simulation” and “Digital Human Modelling and Simulation” software. Through a brief review of the relevant literature we were able to get an overall understanding of how researchers and practitioners are using these tools to incorporate ergonomics into the design process. The affordances and limitations of each tool for simulating future scenarios in an ergonomics perspective are highlighted. Additionally, a comparison framework inspired by Ziolek and Krutihof (2000) division of the human modelling environment process was developed. The four aspects of this comparison framework comprised the manikin, the environment, the analysis and the interactions. Then, each of the presented tools were compared along these dimensions. Furthermore, we discuss possible ways for articulating these simulation tools throughout the design process. The results can help practitioners and researchers when planning computer simulations targeting ergonomics aspects of future work systems.

Keywords

Computer aided design Game engines Discrete Event Simulation Digital Human Modelling 

References

  1. Aromaa S, Väänänen K (2016) Suitability of virtual prototypes to support human factors/ergonomics evaluation during the design. Appl Ergon 56:11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backstrand G, Hogberg D (2007) Ergonomics analysis in a virtual environment. Int J Manuf Res 2:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks J, Nelson BL, Carson JS, Nicol DM (2010) Discrete-event system simulation, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  4. Béguin P, Weill-Fassina A (2002) Da simulação das situações de trabalho à situação da simulação. In: Duarte F (ed) Ergonomia e projeto: na indústria de processo contínuo, 1st edn. Editora Lucerna, Rio de Janeiro, pp 34–63Google Scholar
  5. Braatz D (2015) Suportes De Simulação Como Objetos Intermediários Para Incorporação Da Perspectiva Da Atividade Na Concepção De Situações Produtivas. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Tese de DoutoradoGoogle Scholar
  6. Braatz D, Lopes D, Camarotto J, Menegon NL (2011) Evaluation of different interaction methods applied in participatory workspace design. In: 21st international conference on production researchGoogle Scholar
  7. Braatz D, Tonin L, Fontes A, Menegon N (2013) Digital human modeling and simulation for ergonomics workspace design : two Brazilian cases. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international digital human modeling symposium, Ann Arbor, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  8. Broberg O, Andersen V, Seim R (2011) Participatory ergonomics in design processes: the role of boundary objects. Appl Ergon 42:464–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaffin DB (2005) Improving digital human modelling for proactive ergonomics in design. Ergonomics 48:478–491.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaffin DB (1997) Development of computerized human static strength simulation model for job design. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 7:305–322.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6564(199723)7:4<305::aid-hfm3>3.0.co;2-7
  11. Duarte F, Goldenstein M (1996) O layout como imagem da organização do trabalho: a participação da ergonomia no projeto de salas de controle. In: Anais do Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção. ABEPRO, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  12. Eckert C, Boujut JF (2003) Introduction: the role of objects in design co-operation: communication through physical or virtual objects. Comput Support Coop Work CSCW Int J 12:145–151.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023954726209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. da Costa Alves Ferreira R, Braatz D (2015) Articulação Conceitual Integrada para Aplicação de Ferramentas Computacionais no Projeto de Situações Produtivas. In: Anais do XXXV ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO. ABEPRO, Fortaleza, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  14. Fontes ARM, Parise AC, Filippi GF et al (2014) Complementarities of DHM and ergonomics analysis of work into workplace design: the task of manual packing. Int J Hum Factors Model Simul 4:266–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gatto LBS, Mól ACA, dos Santos IJAL et al (2013) Virtual simulation of a nuclear power plant’s control room as a tool for ergonomic evaluation. Prog Nucl Energy 64:8–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2012.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hettinger LJ, Kirlik A, Goh YM, Buckle P (2015) Modelling and simulation of complex sociotechnical systems: envisioning and analysing work environments. Ergonomics 58:600–614.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1008586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hossain NUI, Debusk H, Hasan M et al (2017) Reducing patient waiting time in an outpatient clinic: a discrete event simulation (DES) based approach. In: 67th annual conference Expo and Institute of Industrial EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  18. Laughery R (1999) Using discrete-event simulation to model human performance in complex systems. In: Farrington PA, Nembhard HB, Sturrock DT, Evans GW (eds) Proceedings of the 1999 winter simulation conference, pp 815–820Google Scholar
  19. Maline J (1994) Simuler le Travail: une aide à la conduite de project. ANACT, MontrougeGoogle Scholar
  20. Marconi M, Germani M, Favi C, Raffaeli R (2018) CAD feature recognition as a means to prevent ergonomics issues during manual assembly tasks. Comput Aided Des Appl 15:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2018.1441240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mattila M (1996) Computer-aided ergonomics and safety - a challenge for integrated ergonomics. Int J Ind Ergon 17:309–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(95)00062-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paravizo E, Braatz D (2017) Analysis, validation and design: using Game Engines to support ergonomics intervention and design process. In: 48th annual conference of the association of Canadian ergonomists & 12th international symposium on human factors in organizational design and management, Banff, pp 488–495Google Scholar
  23. Patel T, Sanjog J, Karmakar S (2016) Ergonomics perspective in agricultural research: a user-centred approach using CAD and digital human modeling (DHM) technologies. J Inst Eng Ser A 97:333–342.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-016-0162-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paul G, Quintero-Duran M (2015) Ergonomic assessment of hospital bed moving using DHM Siemens JACK. In: Proceedings of 19th Triennial Congress of the international ergonomics association, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  25. Perez J, de Looze MP, Bosch T, Neumann WP (2014) Discrete event simulation as an ergonomic tool to predict workload exposures during systems design. Int J Ind Ergon 44:298–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2013.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. dos Santos WR, Braatz D, Tonin LA, Menegon NL (2016) Análise do uso integrado de um sistema de captura de movimentos com um software de modelagem e simulação humana para incorporação da perspectiva da atividade. Gestão Produção 23:612–624.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1758-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson JR (1997) Virtual environments and ergonomics: needs and opportunities. Ergonomics 40:1057–1077.  https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397187603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zamberlan M, Santos V, Streit P et al (2012) DHM simulation in virtual environments: a case-study on control room design. Work J Prev Assess Rehabil 41:2243–2247.  https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0446-2243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou D, Chen J, Lv C, Cao Q (2016) A method for integrating ergonomics analysis into maintainability design in a virtual environment. Int J Ind Ergon 54:154–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ziolek SA, Kruithof PC (2000) Human modeling & simulation: a primer for practitioners. In: Human modeling & simulation: a primer for practitioners. Human factors and ergonomics society, pp 825–827Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringFederal University of Sao CarlosSao CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations