Advertisement

Ergonomics in the Age of Creative Knowledge Workers – Define, Assess, Optimize

  • Lorenz Prasch
  • Klaus Bengler
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 821)

Abstract

While the performance of knowledge workers is becoming increasingly important, optimization for one of their key responsibilities is a difficult endeavor: The generation of new knowledge or products, meaning the creation of creative solutions. This is partially due to the fact that a coherent understanding of the term creativity as well as reliable assessment methods are yet to be found. After a brief overview of available definitions, and distinction and classification of measurement methods, this paper describes a new approach that can enable creativity assessment. Focusing on an outcome-centered view, a method is proposed, that describes how an environment or process can be tested towards it’s potential in enhancing creative performance. By devising carefully crafted tasks, a machine can objectively evaluate a product’s creative score in terms of usefulness and novelty. This enables systematic testing and comparable assessment throughout different contexts of interest, ultimately bearing the potential to unify testing across different domains. With growing datasets, it should be possible to discover additional common features of creative solutions, thus allowing further insights in the complex construct of creativity and how it is composed. This can facilitate understanding of work environments that foster creativity and shed light on an immanent human ability that is of increasing importance in the future.

Keywords

Ergonomics Knowledge work Creativity 

References

  1. 1.
    Dul J et al (2006) A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics 55(4):377–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelley RE (1985) The Gold-Collar worker: harnessing the brainpower of the New Work force. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bubb H (2006) A consideration of the nature of work and the consequences for the human-oriented design of production and products. Appl Ergon 37(4 spec. iss.):401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roongrerngsuke S, Liefooghe A (2013) Attracting gold-collar workers: comparing organizational attractiveness and work-related values across generations in China, India and Thailand. Asia Pac Bus Rev 19(3):337–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drucker P (1959) Landmarks of tomorrow: a report on the new “Post-Modern” world. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramírez YW, Nembhard DA (2004) Measuring knowledge worker productivity. J Intellect Cap 5(4):602–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor FW (1914) The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drucker PF (1999) Knowledge worker productivity: the biggest challenge. Calif Manag Rev 41(2):79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR (1989) Perspectives on individual differences: handbook of creativity. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wallas G (1926) The art of thought, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toynbee A (1964) Is America neglecting her creative minority? In: Widening horizons in creativity, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Batey M (2012) The measurement of creativity: from definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creat Res J 24(1):95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Albert RS, Runco MA (1999) A history of research on creativity. Handb Creat 2(0502167):16–34Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prentky RA (2001) Mental illness and roots of genius. Creat Res J 13(1):95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1988) Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 325–339Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boden MA (2003) The creative mind: myths and mechanisms, 2nd edn. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardner H (1993) Creating minds: an anatomy as seenthrough the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham and Gandhi. HarperCollinsPublishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaufman JC, Beghetto RA (2009) Beyond big and little: the four C model of creativity. Rev Gen Psychol 13(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Runco MA (2004) Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol 55(1):657–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rhodes M (1961) An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42(7):305–310Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guilford JP (1959) Traits of creativity. In: Anderson HH (ed) Creativity and its cultivation. Harper, New York, pp 142–161Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Piffer D (2012) Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Think Skills Creat 7(3):258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zeng L, Proctor RW, Salvendy G (2011) Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creat Res J 23(1):24–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Besemer S, O’Quin K (1986) Analyzing creative products: refinement and test of a judging instrument. J Creat Behav 20(2):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cropley AJ (1999) Creativity and cognition: producing effective novelty. Roeper Rev 21(4):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI (1999) The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. Handb Creat 1:3–15Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Runco MA, Jaeger GJ (2012) The standard definition of creativity. Creat Res J 24(1):92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Corazza GE (2016) Potential originality and effectiveness: the dynamic definition of creativity. Creat Res J 28(3):258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Plucker JA, Beghetto RA, Dow GT (2004) Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educ Psychol 39(2):83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eysenck HJ (1993) Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory. Psychol Inq 4(3):147–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guilford JP (1950) Creativity. Am Psychol 5(9):444–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative cognition: theory, research, and applicationsGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mednick S (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol Rev 69(3):220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assesing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J 39(5):1154–1184Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dul J, Ceylan C (2011) Work environments for employee creativity. Ergonomics 0139(January):1–25Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mumford MD (2003) Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creat Res J 15(2–3):107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hargreaves HL (1927) The “Faculty” of imagination: an enquiry concerning the existence of a general “Faculty,” or group factor of imagination. Br J Psychol Monogr Suppl 3(10)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wallach MA, Kogan N (1965) Modes of thinking in young childrenGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guilford JP (1967) The nature of human intelligenceGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Torrance EP (1974) Torrance tests of creative thinking. Directions manual and scoring guide, verbal test booklet B. Scholastic Testing ServiceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of ErgonomicsTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations