Conceptual and Practical Strategy Work to Promote Ergonomics/Human Factors in Sweden
This paper describes the results of the conceptual and practical strategy work performed by the Swedish Ergonomics and Human Factors Society (EHSS) today. The rationale of EHSS is to strengthen the quality of ergonomics/human factors knowledge and practice in Sweden and form a multidisciplinary platform across disciplines and professions for collaboration and for knowledge sharing. EHSS gathers about 350 members, representing different occupations in industry, academia and the public sector. Together, EHSS members hold knowledge and experience in physical, cognitive and organizational ergonomics and its application in working life and society.
The overall aim of this paper is to inspire related societies and stakeholders to initiate discussions about strategies and future projects that allow for collaboration and knowledge sharing. Proposedly follow the EHSS model where we have formed a multidisciplinary platform for collaboration across disciplines and professions. The activities initiated and supported by EHSS are one step towards broadening the knowledge and application of HFE in Sweden, and to comprise new arenas of specialization. By participating in the key areas in society such as teaching, standardization, product development and occupational safety and health, the work of EHSS is one piece of the puzzle to improve human activities in the future. The vision is that together, we can improve safety, efficiency and well-being for all.
KeywordsFuture of ergonomics Knowledge sharing Design for all
- 1.Hendrick HW (1996) Good ergonomics is good economics. In: The human factors and ergonomics society 40th annual meeting - the presidential addressGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ahlin J et al (2015) Strategies to develop and strengthen human factors and ergonomics knowledge among stakeholders in Sweden. In: 19th Triennial congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA), Melbourne 9–14 August 2015. International Ergonomics AssociationGoogle Scholar
- 5.EHSS (2018) On EHSS. http://ergonomisallskapet.se/
- 8.Long J et al (2014) A definition of visual ergonomics. Appl. Ergon 45(126):3Google Scholar
- 9.Hämphälä H et al (2017) A risk assessment method for visual ergonomics, VERAM. In: FALF Conference: Arbetslivets utmaningar i staden och på landsbygden. SLU, AlnarpGoogle Scholar
- 10.Glimne S, Brautaset R, Österman C (2018) Visual ergonomics in control room environments: a case study from a Swedish paper mill. In: IEA 2018 - 20th congress international ergonomics association, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
- 11.Babapour M, Karlsson M, Osvalder A-L (2018) Appropriation of an Activity-based Flexible Office in daily work. Nordic J Working Life Stud 8(S3)Google Scholar
- 12.Nybacka M, Osvalder A-L, Inclusive design strategies to enhance inclusivity for all in public transportation - A case study on a railway station. In: Proceedings at in IEA 20th congress international ergonomics association, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
- 14.CREE (2015) The CREE directory. https://www.eurerg.eu/the-cree-directory/
- 15.Lagerström G et al (2017) Development of the online course “Work and Technology on Human Terms”. In: NES 2017 Joy at WorkGoogle Scholar
- 16.Rose L, Österman C (2018) Developing an international master’s programme in ergonomics at a technical university in Sweden, In: IEA 20th congress international ergonomics association, FlorenceGoogle Scholar