Virtual Simulation of Human-Robot Collaboration Workstations

  • Pamela Ruiz CastroEmail author
  • Dan Högberg
  • Håkan Ramsen
  • Jenny Bjursten
  • Lars Hanson
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 822)


The constant call in manufacturing for higher quality, efficiency, flexibility and cost effective solutions has been supported by technology developments and revised legislations in the area of collaborative robots. This allows for new types of workstations in industry where robots and humans co-operate in performing tasks. In addition to safety, the design of such collaborative workstations needs to consider the areas of ergonomics and task allocation to ensure appropriate work conditions for the operators, while providing overall system efficiency. The aim of this study is to illustrate the development and use of an integrated robot simulation and digital human modelling (DHM) tool, which is aimed to be a tool for engineers to create and confirm successful collaborative workstations. An assembly scenario from the vehicle industry was selected for its redesign into a collaborative workstation. The existing scenario as well as potential collaborative concepts are simulated and assessed using a version of the simulation tool IPS IMMA. The assembly use case illustrates the capabilities of the tool to represent and evaluate collaborative workstations in terms of ergonomics and efficiency assessments.


Human-robot collaboration Digital human modelling Ergonomics Virtual simulation Collaborative workstations 



This work has been carried out within the Virtual Verification of Human-Robot Collaboration project, supported by VINNOVA/FFI and by the participating organizations. This support is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks goes to Victoria Gonzalez, Volvo Trucks and FCC (Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre).


  1. 1.
    Siciliano B, Khatib O (2016) Springer handbook of robotics, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jimmerson G, Menassa R, Pearson T, Shi J (2012) Levels of human and robot collaboration for automotive manufacturing. In: NIST special publication 1136, 2012 proceedings of the performance metrics for intelligent systems (PerMI–‘12) workshop, U.S. Department of Commerce, pp 95–100Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krüger J, Nickolay B, Heyer P, Seliger G (2005) Image based 3D surveillance for flexible man-robot-cooperation. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michalos G, Makris S, Tsarouchi P, Guasch T, Kontovrakis D, Chryssolouris G (2015) Design considerations for safe human-robot collaborative workplaces. Procedia CIRP 37:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang L (2015) Collaborative robot monitoring and control for enhanced sustainability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(9–12):1433–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO, T. S. 15066 (2016) ISO TS 15066-Robots and robotic devices-collaborative robotsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cherubini A, Passama R, Crosnier A, Lasnier A, Fraisse P (2016) Collaborative manufacturing with physical human–robot interaction. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 40:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duffy VG (2009) Handbook of digital human modeling. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaffin DB (2001) Digital human modelling for vehicle and workplace design. SAE International, WarrendaleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ore F, Hanson L, Delfs N, Wiktorsson M (2015) Human-industrial robot collaboration—development and application of simulation software. Int J Hum Factors Model 5:164–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maurice P, Padois V, Measson Y, Bidaud P (2017) Human-oriented design of collaborative robots. Int J Ind Ergon 57:88–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ore F, Reddy Vemula B, Hanson L, Wiktorsson M (2016) Human-industrial robot collaboration—application of simulation software for workstation optimization. In: Proceedings of the 6th CIRP conference on assembly technologies and systems, pp 181–186Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zanchettin A, Ceriani N, Rocco P, Ding H, Matthias B (2016) Safety in human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments: metrics and control. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 13(2):882–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ruiz Castro P, Mahdavian N, Brolin E, Högberg D, Hanson L (2017) IPS IMMA for designing human-robot collaboration workstations. In 5th international digital human modeling symposium, Bonn/Germany, June 26–28Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IPS homepage. Accessed 10 May 2018
  16. 16.
    Bohlin R, Delfs N, Mårdberg P, Carlson JS (2014) A framework for combining digital human simulation with robots and other objects, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Högberg D, Hanson L, Bohlin R, Carlson JS (2016) Creating and shaping the DHM tool IMMA for ergonomic product and production design. Int J Digit Hum 1:132–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bohlin R, Delfs N, Hanson L, Högberg D, Carlson JS (2012) Automatic creation of virtual manikin motions maximizing comfort in manual assembly processes. In: 4th CIRP conference on assembly technologies and systems. USA Conference on Assembly Technologies & Systems, pp 209–212Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAtamney L, Corlett EN (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24(2):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xsens homepage. Accessed 26 May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering ScienceUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.Volvo TrucksGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Industrial Development, ScaniaSödertäljeSweden

Personalised recommendations