Advertisement

Studying a New Embarking and Disembarking Process for Future Hyperloop Passengers

  • Danxue Li
  • Wilhelm Frederik van der Vegte
  • Mars Geuze
  • Marinus van der Meijs
  • Suzanne Hiemstra-van Mastrigt
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 823)

Abstract

This paper presents an embarking and disembarking process for the hyperloop, a future high-speed transportation of passengers and goods in tubes. A concept of the (dis)embarking process has been designed and tested with two experiments. The first experiment was performed to compare the new concept to one that is more similar to the current embarking setup of trains on the aspects of efficiency and experience. Participants were asked to (dis)embark in the test settings that simulate the new concept and the conventional situation with luggage. As a result, new passenger flow saves 40% of the time for vehicles to stay on the platform. Follow-up questionnaires and interviews with the participants show that the proposed passenger flow gives a better experience in terms of efficiency, seamlessness and friendliness. The new solution increases the number of doors, which increases the manufacturing complexity and the chance of failure. Narrowing the door size minimizes this effect. Subsequently, a second experiment has been carried out to study the influence of door width on (dis)embarking efficiency and passenger experience following a similar method. It turns out that narrowing the door width does not noticeably influence the embarking time, but the disembarking time does increase. Interviews show that half of the participants sense a negative experience with narrower doors, while the other half do not notice a difference.

Keywords

Boarding Passenger flow Luggage solution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. P. Vink for the latest information in the field of aviation passenger experience. They appreciate that J. Li pointed out the interesting study by Helbing et al. (2002 and 2005). Special thanks to Buccaneer Delft for providing the testing environment and connections to the participants.

References

  1. 1.
    Musk E (2013) Hyperloop Alpha. SpaceX. http://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/hyperloop_alpha-20130812.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2017
  2. 2.
    Mas S, Juan AA, Arias P, Fonseca P (2013) A simulation study regarding different aircraft boarding strategies. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaehn F, Neumann S (2014) Airplane boarding. Eur J Oper Res 244(2015):339–359MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steffen JH (2008) Optimal boarding method for airline passengers. J Air Transp Manag 14(3):146–150MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Helbing D, Farkas IJ, Molnar P, Vicsek T (2002) Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations. Pedestr Evacuation Dyn 21(2):21–58Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Helbing D, Buzna L, Johansson A, Werner T (2005) Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: experiments, simulations, and design solutions. Transp Sci 39(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li J (2018). Crowds inside out: understanding crowds from the perspective of individual crowd members’ experience. PhD thesis (submitted, to be published in October 2018). Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li D (2017) (Dis)embarking Hyperloop: design of the process and infrastructure for passengers. Master thesis (under embargo until August 2018). Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danxue Li
    • 1
  • Wilhelm Frederik van der Vegte
    • 1
  • Mars Geuze
    • 2
  • Marinus van der Meijs
    • 2
  • Suzanne Hiemstra-van Mastrigt
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Industrial Design EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Hardt HyperloopDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations