Advertisement

Conceptual Design of E-health Services by, and for Support of, Home Care Staff

  • Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir
  • Christofer Rydenfält
  • Johanna Persson
  • Gerd Johansson
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

Together with staff from home care from four municipalities we investigated how e-health services can improve the work environment. In a series of four workshops we coached the participants in (1) describing their work process and pinpointing the problematic situations in the process, (2) formulating their wishes for an ideal work process, (3) conceptualizing how e-health solutions can be used to obtain the ideal work process and describing scenarios (4) illustrating the scenarios and the design process on storyboards. The storyboards describe, amongst other, how support through e-health systems may be used to: gain access to adequate information; get in touch with other professionals as doctors or other colleagues; prevent medication errors, and to transfer images or physiological data to an expert who can directly provide personal support.

Keywords

E-health Home care Co-design Conceptual models 

References

  1. 1.
    AFA Försäkringar (2016) Allvarliga arbetsskador och sjukfrånvarorapport 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Raeve P, Gomez S, Hughes P et al (2016) Enhancing the provision of health and social care in Europe through eHealth. Int Nurs Rev 64(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paré G, Sicotte C, Moreault MP, Poba-Nzaou P, Nahas G, Templier M (2011) Mobile computing and the quality of home care nursing practice. J Telemed Telecare 17(6):313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Regeringskansliet (2006) Nationell IT-strategi för vård och omsorg. ISBN 91-631-8541-5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Regeringskansliet Socialdepartementet, Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (2016) Vision e-hälsa 2025 – gemensamma utgångspunkter för digitalisering i socialtjänst och hälso- och sjukvård. Artikelnummer: S2016.004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borosund E, Ruland CM, Moore S, Ekstedt M (2014) Nurses’ experiences of using an interactive tailored patient assessment tool one year past implementation. Int J Med Inform 83(7):e23–e34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.010
  7. 7.
    Varsi C, Ekstedt M, Gammon D, Borosund E, Ruland CM (2015) Middle managers’ experiences and role in implementing an interactive tailored patient assessment eHealth intervention in clinical practice. Comput Inform Nurs 33(6):249–257Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scandurra I, Liljequist D (2016) Ten demands of improved usability in ehealth and some progress – co-creation by health and social care professionals. Nurs Inform.  https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-658-3-227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chamberlain P, Patrige R (2017) Co-designing co-design. Shifting the culture of practice in healthcare. Des J 20(supp1).  https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352720
  10. 10.
    Wang L, Shen W, Xie H, Neelamkavil J, Pardasani A (2002) Collaborative conceptual design – state of the art and future trends. Comput Aid Des 3:981–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir
    • 1
  • Christofer Rydenfält
    • 1
  • Johanna Persson
    • 1
  • Gerd Johansson
    • 1
  1. 1.Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations