Advertisement

Exploring Packaging Lid Design Preferences Among Mexican University Students

  • Paulina Manzano-Hernandez
  • David Vidana-Zavala
  • Carlos Aceves-Gonzalez
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to evaluate Mexican students’ preferences of three redesigned lids. To reach the objective, a test was performed with three 3D printed lids that were redesigned based on valuable features regarding the overall shape, texture, and dimensions as found in previous studies. The most different characteristic among the lids was the overall shape. Eighteen female university students participated in this test, which consisted of opening a bottle using the three redesigned lids while placing their hand according to the user’s most comfortable position.

Four methods were used to measure perceived exertion, user’s satisfaction, comfort and perceived effort, and the kind of grip used by the participants: the Borg CR-10 scale, two questionnaires to measure satisfaction and a direct observation made by the researchers. Results suggest that students’ preferences were focused on the enhanced grip through the use of hexagonal lids with rounded corners and clearly marked concave sides to place the fingers on the lid’s wall. Overall, the results in this study provide valuable ideas to designers in order to create lids that are able to satisfy the needs and preferences of people with characteristics similar to those of the participants in this research. Similarly, the study offers an opportunity for trying the ideas with other groups of users.

Keywords

Usability Lid design Perception Openability 

References

  1. 1.
    Ávila-Chaurand R, Prado-León LR, González-Muñoz EL (2007) Dimensiones antropométricas de la población latinoamericana. Universidad de Guadalajara, GuadalajaraGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borg G (1998) Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crawford JO, Wanibe E, Nayak L (2002) The interaction between lid diameter, height and shape on wrist torque exertion in younger and older adults. Ergonomics 45:922–933.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130210162243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fransson-Hall C, Kilbom Å (1993) Sensitivity of the hand to surface pressure. Appl Ergon 24:181–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90006-UCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langley J, Janson R, Wearn J, Yoxall A (2005) ‘Inclusive’ design for containers: improving openability. Packag Technol Sci 18:285–293.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rowson J, Yoxall A (2011) Hold, grasp, clutch or grab: consumer grip choices during food container opening. Appl Ergon 42:627–633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomlinson SE, Lewis R, Carré MJ, Franklin SE (2013) Human finger friction in contacts with ridged surfaces. Wear 301:330–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Villar-Fernández MF. Tareas repetitivas II: Evaluación del riesgo para la extremidad superior. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo. Available via Instituto Nacional de Seguridad, Salud y Bienestar en el Trabajo. http://www.insht.es/MusculoEsqueleticos/Contenidos/Formacion%20divulgacion/material%20didactico/Tareas%20repetitivas%202_evaluacion.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018
  9. 9.
    Yen WT, Flinn SR, Sommerich CM, Lavender SA, Sanders EBN (2013) Preference of lid design characteristics by older adults with limited hand function. J Hand Ther 26:261–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2013.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yen WT, Sommerich CM, Lavender SA, Flinn SR, Sanders EBN (2016) Evaluation of jar lid design characteristics by older women with hand use limitations. Appl Ergon 52:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad PanamericanaZapopanMexico
  2. 2.Centro de Investigaciones en ErgonomíaUniversidad de GuadalajaraGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations