Advertisement

How to Implement a High-Fidelity Prototyping Approach in a Cardiac Surgery Device?

Heuristic Inspection, Task Analysis and Usability Testing for Improving an Aortic Valve Resection and Implantation Device Design
  • René Patesson
  • Eric Brangier
  • Xavier Bollen
  • Mathias Tummers
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

Increasingly often, the surgeon operates remotely. More and more, he/she does neither see nor touch the patient directly but acts with miniaturized systems, such as catheters and robotic instruments. This reduces intervention time and accelerates the patient’s recovery. This paper reports the ergonomic contribution to the design of a device for the resection of stenosed aortic valves and the implantation of a new aortic bioprosthesis. In high-risk contexts as in cardiac surgery, high fidelity prototypes are necessary to allow clinical trials. An association between engineers and ergonomists becomes essential, because the prototype becomes a key stage of the design process. We suggest a triangulation of methods (heuristic inspection, task analysis and usability testing) to produce a high-fidelity prototype reliable for clinical trials. The clinical trials themselves then constitute a preliminary step for further improving the device.

Keywords

High-fidelity prototype Ergonomics Medical device mechanical design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research project is funded by BioWin, the Health Cluster of Wallonia (Belgium). The AVATAR2 project’s goal is to develop, design and tune a medical device that will allow to resect a stenosed aortic valve very securely and quickly as such to prepare the aortic annulus for implantation of the new artificial valve.

References

  1. 1.
    Astarci P, Glineur D, Elkhoury G, Raucent B (2012) A novel device for endovascular native aortic valve resection for transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 14:378–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bach C, Brangier E, Scapin DL (2005) Comment s’assurer de la facilité d’utilisation d’une nouvelle technologie? In: Lévy-Leboyer C, Louche C, Rolland J-P (eds) Management des organisations. Éditions d’organisation, Paris, pp 413–428Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brangier E, Barcenilla J (2003) Concevoir un produit facile à utiliser. Edition Organisation, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brangier E, Desmarais M, Nemery A, Prom Tep S (2015) Évolution de l’inspection heuristique: intégration de l’accessibilité, de la praticité, de l’émotion et de la persuasion. J d’Interaction Personne-Système (JIPS), 3(1). http://www.journal-interaction-personne-systeme.fr/fr/
  5. 5.
    Carayon P (2011) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. 2nd edn. CRC Press, 876 pGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carayon P, Bass E, Bellandi T, Gurses A, Hallbeck S, Mollo V (2011) Socio-technical systems analysis in health care: a research agenda. IEEE Trans Healthcare Syst Eng 1(1):145–160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2011.619158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Navarra E, Mosala Nezhad Z, Bollen X, Gielen C-E, Mastrobuoni S, De Kerchove L, Benoit R, Astarci P (2016) Endovascular resection of the native aortic valve before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: state of the art and review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50(3):406–410.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patesson R, Brangier E (2015) Gérer l’information dans l’intervention chirurgicale à distance. Méthodologie de mise au point d’un système de commande en chirurgie cardiaque. Les écosystèmes numériques et la démocratisation informationnelle: Intelligence collective, Développement durable, Interculturalité, Transfert de connaissances Nov 2015, Schoelcher, France. EUTIC 2015. http://www.eutic.fr/2015/. hal-01375810. https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-01375810/document
  9. 9.
    Patesson R, Brangier E (2015) Observation des activités de chirurgie cardiaque en salle d’opération: premières descriptions de l’activité de pose d’une endovalve. In: Caroly S, Morais A (eds) Articulation performance et santé dans l’évolution des systèmes de production. SELF 2015, Congrès International d’Ergonomie, Paris, France pp 436–445. https://ergonomie-self.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Recueil-Actes-2015.pdf
  10. 10.
    Patesson R, Brangier E (2016) Analyse d’une tâche critique provoquée en chirurgie cardiaque: perspectives ergonomiques pour la pose d’endovalve. Actes de la conférence Ergo’IA 2016. Bidart Biarritz.6, 7, 8 juillet 2016. www.ergoia.estia.fr/tl_files/…/Ergo’IA%202016%20-%20ConferenceProgram.pdf
  11. 11.
    Patesson R, Brangier E, (2016) Decision making and executive functioning in aortic valve resection: about the design of an ergonomic aortic valve resection tool. Chapter 73, pp 146–148. Elsevier - International Neuroergonomics conference, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patesson R, Brangier E (2016) The ten characteristics of the critical task. Ergonomic analysis of vitality requirements in aortic valve surgery. In: Duffy V (ed) Digital human modeling: applications in health, safety, ergonomics and risk management, pp 42–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40247-5_5
  13. 13.
    Weinger BW, Wiklund ME Gardner-Bonnerau DJ (2011) Handbook of human factors in medical device design. CRC Press, 844 pGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang J, Johnson TR, Patel VL, Paige DL, Kubose T (2003) Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices. J Biomed Inform 36(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Patesson
    • 1
  • Eric Brangier
    • 2
  • Xavier Bollen
    • 3
  • Mathias Tummers
    • 3
  1. 1.Université Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Université de LorraineNancyFrance
  3. 3.Institute of Mechanics, Materials and Civil EngineeringUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations