On the Role of Ergonomics at the Interface Between Research and Practice

  • Patrick G. DempseyEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)


Ergonomics is comprised of a scientific discipline and professional practice. Broadly speaking, these two components are often referred to as research and practice, and the individual members sometimes identify as researchers or practitioners. Some subset of ergonomists conduct both research and practice. Since the early days of the field, there has been a certain amount of tension between research and practice. Although such tension is not specific to the ergonomics field, ergonomics is uniquely positioned to analyze the interface between researchers and practitioners to optimize the interaction between these two groups of stakeholders. Ergonomists have varied experience and education, and perhaps too little attention has been focused on understanding both the capabilities and limitations of ergonomists. More specific attention to understanding the needs of users of ergonomics research is proposed as another avenue to reduce the research-practice tension. Similarly, the organizational needs and expectations of consumers of ergonomics services will lead to research being better able to result in tools and assessments that will help ergonomists fulfill the needs of their customers. An example from the U.S. mining industry will be used in this paper to illustrate how understanding the eventual application context of ergonomics and its end users can create relevant and easy-to-use ergonomics tools.


Ergonomics practice Research Practitioner 


  1. Chung AZQ, Shorrock ST (2011) The research-practice relationship in ergonomics and human factors – surveying and bridging the gap. Ergonomics 54(5):413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dempsey PG, Burdorf A, Fathallah F, Sorock GS, Hashemi L (2001) Influence of measurement accuracy on the application of the 1991 NIOSH equation. Appl Ergon 32(1):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dempsey PG, Lowe BD, Jones E (2018) An international survey of tools and methods used by certified ergonomics professionals. In: Proceedings of the 20th congress of the international ergonomics association. Springer, Heidelberg. In pressGoogle Scholar
  4. Dempsey PG, McGorry RW, Maynard WS (2005) A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists. Appl Ergon 36:489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dempsey PG, Pollard JP, Porter WL, Mayton A, Heberger JR, Gallagher S, Reardon L, Drury CG (2017) Development of ergonomics audits for bagging, haul truck, and maintenance and repair operations in mining. Ergonomics 60(12):1739–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. International Ergonomics Association. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
  7. Shorrock ST, Williams CA (2016) Human factors and ergonomics methods in practice: three fundamental constraints. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 17:468–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stanton NA (2016) On the reliability and validity of, and training in, ergonomics methods: a challenge revisited. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 17(4):345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stanton NA, Young MS (2003) Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. Appl Ergon 34:479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Waterson P, Sell R (2006) Recurrent themes and developments in the history of the Ergonomics Society. Ergonomics 49(8):743–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Mining Research DivisionPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations