Advertisement

Serious Games as Creative Tools to Approach Design

  • Isabella Patti
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

The article aims to reflect on the potential of the games in the educational context of university students attending History and Design Criticism courses. The central topic is the Serious Game, understood as digital tools for creative learning: their recent emergence as a branch of video games and a promising educational frontier, has introduced the concept of games designed for a serious purpose other than pure entertainment. The Serious Games are interactive digital activities that through simulation allow players to make a precise and accurate (even complex) experience. The article encourages the use of the Serious games as a participatory and engaging learning process to implement the active knowledge achieved through simulated experience of the game. Indeed, when used together or combined with conventional training and educational approaches, the Serious games could provide a more powerful means of knowledge transfer in almost all application domains. For this reason, the second objective of the article is to highlight the type of enrichment offered to the student-player by a Serious game: through the sensory gratification and iteration, he can know a topic through a critical action because the use of games stimulates ideas, improves individual sensitivity and collective work, and enhances knowledge skills. Finally, the article proposes some basic elements for the narrative structure of a Serious game dedicated to design, highlighting how the agreement between the invention, understood as “creativity with constraints” and the technical competence, are essential to obtain the experiential potential of the game.

Keywords

Serious game Game design Creativity Constraints Aesthetic experience 

References

  1. Aarseth E (1997) Cybertext: perspectives on ergodic literature. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoletti M (2010) Il videogioco. Questioni, tassonomie, similitudini. In: REM - Ricerche su educazione e media, vol 1, pp 89–103Google Scholar
  3. Andreoletti M (2012) Gioco e videogioco: riflessioni tra educazione e intrattenimento. In: Felini D, pp 35–48 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Anolli L, Mantovani F (2011) Come funziona la nostra mente. In: Apprendimento, simulazione e Serious Games. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  5. Backe H, Fassone R, Karhulati VM, Švelch J (2016) What is the “game” in meta-game? In: Proceedings of the DiGRA-FDG 2016 conference, Dundee, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernhaupt R, Eckschlager M, Tscheligi M (2007) Methods for evaluating games. In: Inakage M, Lee N, Tscheligi M, Bernhaupt R, Natkin S (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on advances in computer entertainment technology – ACE 2007. ACM Press, New York, pp 309–310Google Scholar
  7. Bernhaupt R (ed) (2010) Evaluating User Experience in Games. Springer, London.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertolo M, Mariani I (2014) Game design. Gioco e giocare tra teoria e progetto. Pearson, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  9. Bittanti M (2004) Per una cultura dei video games. Teorie e prassi del videogiocare, 2nd edn. Ed. Unicopli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  10. Bittanti M, Quaranta D (2006) GameScenes. Art in the age of videogames. Johan & Levi, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  11. Bogost I (2006) Unit operations. an approach to videogame criticism. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Bogost I (2011) Persuasive games: exploitationware. http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6366/persuasive_games_exploitationware.php/. Accessed 12 May 2011
  13. Bogost I (2012) Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butler DL, Winne PH (1995) Feed-back and self-regulated learning, a theoretical synthesis. Rev Educ Res 65:245–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caillois R (1967) Les jeux et les hommes. Le masque et le vertige. Edition Gallimard, Paris. (tr. it. I giochi e gli uomini. La maschera e la vertigine, Bompiani: Milano 2005)Google Scholar
  16. Caruso G, Fassone R, Ferri G, Gualeni S, Salvador M (2013) G|A|M|E on games: the meta-panel. Panel presented at DiGRA 2013. Defragging game studies, Atlanta (GA)Google Scholar
  17. Cerreti F, Felini D, Giannatelli R (2006) Primi passi nella media education. Curricolo di educazione ai media per la scuola primaria. Erickson, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  18. Crawford C (1984) The art of computer game design. McGraw-Hill, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  19. Csíkszentmihályi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety: the experience of play in work and games. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  20. Felini D (ed) (2012) Video game education. Studi e percorsi di formazione. Milano, UnicopliGoogle Scholar
  21. Forlizzi J, Battarbee K (2004) Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on designing, interactive systems (DIS 2004): processes, practices, methods, and techniques, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Frateili E (1996) La creatività. In: Ripensare il design. Tecniche Nuove, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  23. Fulco I (2004) Lo zero ludico. In: Bittanti M (ed) Decostruzione del videogioco e fondamenti della passinone ludica, pp 57–98Google Scholar
  24. Grachi P (2001) Enzo Frateili. Architettura Design Tecnologia. Skira, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  25. Guercio G (2017) Il demone di Picasso. Macerata, QuodilibetGoogle Scholar
  26. Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N (2006) User experience – a research agenda. Behav Inf Technol 25(2):91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huizinga J (1938) Homo ludens. Tijeenk willing, Haarlem. (It. trad. Homo Ludens. Torino: Einaudi, 2002)Google Scholar
  28. ISO FDIS 9241-210:2010 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 210: human-centered design for interactive systems. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=52075
  29. Jenkins H (2010) Culture partecipative e competenze digitali. Media education per il XXI secolo. Guerini, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  30. Komulainen J, Takatalo J, Lehtonen M, Nyman G: Psychologically structured approach to user experience in games. In: Tollmar K, Jönsson B (eds) Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction building bridges – NordiCHI 2008. ACM Press, New York, pp 487–490Google Scholar
  31. Koster R (2004) A theory of fun for game design. Paraglyph Press, PhoenixGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucchi N (2010) I contenuti digitali. Tecnologie, diritti e libertà. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manovich L (2010) Software culture. Olivares, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  34. McGonigal J (2011) La realtà in gioco. Perché i giochi ci rendono migliori e come possono cambiare il mondo. Apogeo Education, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  35. McMahan RP, Gorton D, Gresock J, McConnell W, Bowman DA.: Separating the effects of level of immersion and 3D interaction techniques. In: Slater M, Kitamura Y, Tal A, Amditis A, Chrysanthou Y (eds) Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology. ACM, New York, pp 108–111Google Scholar
  36. Murray J (1997) Hamlet on the holodeck: the future of narrative in cyberspace. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Montola M, Waern A (2006) Ethical and practical look at unaware game participation. In: Santorineos M, Dimitriadi N (eds) Gaming realities. a challenge for digital culture. Fournos, Athens, pp 185–193Google Scholar
  38. Munari B (1971) Artista e designer. Roma Bari, LaterzaGoogle Scholar
  39. Pareyson L (1954) Estetica. Teoria della formatività. Edizioni di Filosofia, Torino. (it. ed. Milano: Bompiani 1988)Google Scholar
  40. Pecchinenda G (2003) Videogiochi e cultura della simulazione. Editori Laterza, Roma-BariGoogle Scholar
  41. Pellittieri M, Salvador M (2014) Conoscere i videogiochi. Introduzione alla storia e alle teorie del video ludico. Tunuè, LatinaGoogle Scholar
  42. Petrucco C (2010) Didattica dei social software e del Web 2.0. CLEUP, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodriguez H (2006) The playful and the serious: an approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens. In: Game studies, vol 6, no 1Google Scholar
  44. Salen K, Zimmerman E (2004) Rules of play. Game design fundamentals. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Schell J (2008) The art of game design. Taylor&Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Traini L, Ferrari D (2011) Neoludica art and videogames 2011–1966. Skirà, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson L (2008) Serious play: counter-actions and interventional dissent in the game space. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on electronic art ISEA 2008Google Scholar
  48. Zimmerman J, Forlizzi J, Evenson S (2007) Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 493–502Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIDA DepartmentFlorence UniversityFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations