The Human Transition to Ergonomics of Ubiquitous Autonomous Work

  • Juan A. Castillo-MartínezEmail author
  • Angela P. Cubillos-Rojas
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)


Until recent years, ergonomics has developed intramurals actions in productive organizations, that is to say, a large part of the research and studies carried out so far in ergonomics have focused on the activities of workers (individually or collectively) in architecturally or physically delimited places, where the reference unit of measurement was the time of execution with respect to an individual, a task or a technology. In the first decade of the 21st century, both the hybridization of forms of work [1] and the emergence of technologies for communication contributed to transforming this scenario and to the emergence of a new horizon; elements such as professional self-management and the emergence of the sphere of ubiquity have emerged, their emergence comes from the available technology that promotes and facilitates the availability of what is necessary to develop an activity or perform a task at any physical point [2], in fact the modification of the worker-company link implies changes in a large part of the basic ideas of ergonomics [3]. Among other reasons because work has an increasingly immaterial character and therefore activities are carried out independently of physical spaces. [4] For this reason, ergonomics requires new elements to be added to the analysis processes; in the interventions, it is necessary to include concepts such as omnipresence, self-implication, intensification, liquid work, availability, self-monitoring and life for work. In other words, ergonomics faces the challenge of a worker immersed in the flow of her professional career and mobility.


Ergonomics Work system Ubiquity Ubiquitous manufacturing system 


  1. 1.
    Ouye JA (2011) Five trends that are dramatically changing work and the workplace. Knoll Workplace Research, Philadelphia, USA.
  2. 2.
    Peyton-Jones T The future of work jobs and skills in 2030. ISBN 978-1-908418-63-0 © UKCES 1st Ed/03.14Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Störmer E, Patscha C, Prendergast J, Daheim C (2014) Trends and disruptions: full report. Z.punkt the Foresight Company. UK Commission for Employment and SkillsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technol Forecast Soc Change 114(C):254–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The future of jobs (2016) Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Global challenge insight report. World Economic ForumGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OECD (2018) Putting faces to the jobs at risk of automation. Policy brief on the future of work. OECD publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eurofound (2015) New forms of employment. Publication of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Putnik GD (2010a) Ubiquitous manufacturing systems vs. ubiquitous manufacturing systems: two paradigms. In: Teti R (ed) Proceedings of the CIRP ICME 2010-7th CIRP international conference on intelligent computation in manufacturing engineering - innovative and cognitive production technology and systems. University of Naples Federico II, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arthur MA, Rousseau DM (1996) The boundaryless career: a new employment principle for a new organizational era. Oxford University Press, New York 11 Briscoe et al 2006Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cadin L, Bender F, de Saint-Giniez V (2003) Carrières nomades: les enseignements d’une comparaison internationale. Vuibert, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garbe E (2015) La construction des carrières dans une perspective agence/structure. Une étude de la construction des carrières humanitaires dans le cadre de la professionnalisation du secteur non profit. Thèse de doctorat non publiée. Université Paris Ouest, ESCP EuropeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Houseman SN, Osawa M (eds) (2003) Nonstandard work in developed economies: causes and consequences. WE Upjohn Institute, KalamazooGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalleberg AL, Reynolds J, Marsden PV (2003) Externalizing employment: flexible staffing arrangements in US organizations. Soc Sci Res 32(4):525–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubery J, Grimshaw D, Marchington M (2010) Blurring boundaries and disordering hierarchies: challenges for employment and skills in networked organizations. PraxisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gandini A (2015) The rise of co-working spaces: a literature review. Ephemera: Theor Polit Organ 15(1):193–205MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    FASECOLDA: Technical indicators on occupational accidents 2000–2011 occupational risk statistics, 29 August 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health and Medicine School, ErgoMotion-labUniversidad del RosarioBogotaColombia
  2. 2.Industrial Design SchoolUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotaColombia

Personalised recommendations