Inclusive Design Strategies to Enhance Inclusivity for All in Public Transportation - A Case Study on a Railway Station

  • Moa NybackaEmail author
  • Anna-Lisa Osvalder
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)


The way traffic information is presented is not optimal for all travellers despite that, transportation systems should be accessible to everyone. The purpose of this study was to investigate how people with various disabilities perceive, experience and need audible and visible traffic information when travelling, especially at railway stations. The goal was to propose ideas on how to improve the accessibility of traffic information. Elderly and people with hearing or visual impairment were studied using online surveys. Observations were also made at the central railway station in Gothenburg, Sweden. The results showed various user demands on how traffic information should be presented to be available and suitable. Visual information screens, mobile phones and spoken information were the mostly used information sources. In general, there are too few information screens and the applications on mobile phones are updated too slowly. During traffic disturbances there are too many announcements and the quality is perceived as poor. The background noise is noticed as too loud. To conclude, it is outmost important to include user experience in the design decisions regarding information flow. The following strategies are proposed for improvement: The number and placement of visual screens should be increased, the content, length and formulations of the audial announcements should be revised, implementation of attention signals should be introduced to alert travellers of new information, and mobile applications should achieve better coherence with the visual and spoken information sources. Quiet zones should be investigated to offer reduced background noise.


Traffic information announcements Audible information Disabled 


  1. 1.
    Nybacka M, Osvalder A-L (2018) Spoken traffic information at railway stations – a behavioural study on how spoken information is perceived and should be designed for improved customer experience. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg. (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Osvalder A-L, Nybacka M (2018) Different user groups’ perception, experience and need of spoken information in public transportation spaces. AHFE. Chalmers University of Technology, GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johansson B (1994) Aging’s effect on memory and thought processes. In: Andersson D et al (eds) When memory fails – about dementia and dementia resembling conditions. Spri och Svenska Läkaresällskapet, Stockholm, pp 43–55. (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Groeger JA (2000) Understanding driving: applying cognitive psychology to a complex everyday task. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levin L, Dukic T, Heikkinen S, Henriksson P, Linder A, Mårdh S, Nielsen B, Nygårdhs S, Peters B (eds) (2007) Elderly in the transport system – mobility, design and training problems. VTI report 593. Proj. nr: 12478/12312. Ref. nr: 2007/0533-23. (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swedish Association of the Visually Impaired Homepage. Accessed 15 Dec 2017. (in Swedish)
  7. 7.
    Swedish Association of Hard of Hearing People Homepage. Accessed 30 Oct 2017. (in Swedish)
  8. 8.
    Metz DH (2000) Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transp Policy 7(2):149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ronström O (ed) (1998) Alert seniors and popular culture. Carlssons Bokförlag, Stockholm. (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Traffic Administration Guidelines Accessibility for children, elderly and disabled people. Traffic Administration Stockholm County Council, Strategic development, Sustainable development. Accessed 01 Dec 2017 (in Swedish)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations